Unit 8 Perry Case Analysis

Decent Essays
Show More
Hi Chyanne,

I would re-post your unit 8 DB response today so you can get full credit because you posted your post on 6-5.

I do agree with you concerning Perry. I agree that he has done nothing wrong because he never changed the way he is handling cases or preparing them even with his original supervising attorney being out of the office. I would say that Perry could later on possible commit a ethical violation if he does something wrong and thew current supervising attorney does not catch it because he is unfamiliar with bankruptcy laws. I feel his supervisor could be breaking Rule 1.1 because Rule 1.1. [1] says "In determining whether a lawyer employs the requisite knowledge and skill in a particular matter, relevant factors include the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    State V. Stewart Case Study
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    State V. Stewart Case Study

    The actuality of the case of State v. Stewart consist of a variety of mental, physical and emotional abuse in which Peggy Stewart had been “pushed” in her own mind to kill her husband to escape from his toxic and cruel behavior. As a result, the facts of the case are a wide variety that contributed to Peggy’s “imminent danger” state of mind when deciding whether her actions were truly self-defense. These include the abuse at hand, physiological trauma that Peggy experienced, and professional opinions about Peggy’s actions. An important factor of the case is Peggy Stewart’s significant abuse by her husband, Mike. Additionally, Mike’s abuse was not only to Peggy; but also to her daughter, Carla.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. V. Sawyer Analysis
    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. V. Sawyer Analysis

    In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer which discussed the issue of inherent presidential power; the Supreme Court ruled that the President did not have the inherent authority to seize private property without authority given from Congress. In Justice Black’s opinion, he makes it clear that even if the president had the power to take over the steel mill he needs to have a congressional statute and it can not be used to settle labor disputes even if they were to disrupt the economy as the president argued. He also says that the seizure cannot be justified due to the president being Commander in Chief by saying that “we cannot with faithfulness to our constitutional system hold that the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces has the ultimate power as such to take possession of private property in order to keep labor disputes from stopping production. This is a job for the Nation's lawmakers, not for its military authorities.” He even goes a step further in saying that the Executive’s job to make sure that laws are faithfully executed…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    First Amendment: Van Orden V. Perry Case
    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages

    First Amendment: Van Orden V. Perry Case

    3. First Amendment: Van Orden v. Perry case is about Orden suing Texas about a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of the state capital building. The question is does a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of a state capitol building violate the First Amendment’s establishment clause. The decision was it does not.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case Analysis

    Although evidence proves that Bob is guilty of the crime, he is protected under the 6th amendment to a right of counsel in a trial. Therefore, he must be assigned a public defender regardless if the evidence found at the scene of the crime proves him guilty. As presented in the Supreme Court case of Gideon V. Wainwright, the defendant Clarence Earl Gideon broke into a pool hall in Panama City Florida hall. He was accused of stealing beer, wine, and coins adding up to less than $50 (Cohen, 2013). At the trial Gideon announced to the judge that he was unable to afford a lawyer therefore requesting to be appointed by a counsel.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Kentucky Montgomery Case Summary
    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kentucky Montgomery Case Summary

    When [[Brian Cassidy]] was accused of raping ex-hooker Heather Riggs he tried the case without prejudice and was close to winning the case despite efforts by his lawyer Barry Querns to prove Brian's innocence. He called Heather, one of her former co-workers and Det. Amaro to the stand to present his case and eventually got Brian to say something incriminating on the stand. Eventually it was revealed that Heather was conspiring with [[Bart Ganzel]] to frame Brian and eventually sue the city and the charges were dropped. ({{SVU}}: "[[Undercover Blue]]") When [[Nick Amaro]] is accused of shooting a kid named Yusef Barre without justification and while under the influence of alcohol Strauss is called to handle the case.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Lakeisha Perry Case Study
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Lakeisha Perry Case Study

    Take Lakeisha Perry’s sons as an example of why minor offenses discourage students and cause them to become repeat offenders. She has 3 sons who have all been through some type of Zero-Tolerance Policy punishment, two have graduated and one has decided to drop out. Her youngest son is the one who has decided to drop out, due to the many problems he has ran into. He has been suspended, expelled and is now struggling with his academics. His first suspension was for using language that was inappropriate and it earned him 10 days.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Diaries V. Perry Body Search Letter
    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Diaries V. Perry Body Search Letter

    Dr. Imani Perry being arrested over a parking tickets was ridiculous. but since it is Princeton’s police department policy officers technically had the right to arrest her. Handcuffing people to tables when they have been taken into custody is supposed to happen. Dr. Perry should not have had to go through the humiliation of being arrested over parking tickets but a police departments’ policy is something officers must follow. So if anything is wrong it is people being able to be arrested over parking tickets.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    R. V. Paterson Case Analysis
    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    R. V. Paterson Case Analysis

    Style of Cause and Citation: R. v. Paterson,(2017) SCC 15 Court: “Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) and Court of Appeal of British Columbia (British Columbia’s Court of Appeal) Facts of the case: Following an agreement with the appellant to affect a “no case” seizure if he surrenders three marihuana roaches. The police make a warrantless search and entry by police into the home of the appellant. Once inside, the police found a bulletproof vest, a firearm and drugs (R. v. Paterson, (2017)). They arrested the appellant and then obtained a tele-warrant to search his apartment, which led to the discovery of other firearms and drugs.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Alu Vs Judge Moore Chapter 4 Summary
    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alu Vs Judge Moore Chapter 4 Summary

    The central point that chapter four is asking is whether or not morality depends on religion. The chapter begins with a story about Judge Moore of Alabama and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The ACLU sued Judge Moore "...for displaying the Ten Commandments in his courtroom. " This was a problem according to the ACLU because, it violates the separation of church and state. Judge Moore however, used this incident to become chief justice.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    1520 Sedgwick Case Summary
    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1520 Sedgwick Case Summary

    The legal process of gentrification is potentially one of the more easily argued cases, especially in a country that prides itself on its free market. Using 1520 Sedgwick as an example as well I will compare how the ideals of a free market economy would effect it with the realities of the situation. First of all, if the US was a true free market economy 1520 Sedgwick would never have been enrolled in the Mitchell-Lama program because such a system wouldn’t exist unless the government owned the property, which also would be contrary to a free market system. Following the fact that these programs do exist and the government does play a role in the economy, including real estate, we have to conclude that the government has to assume at least some sense of responsibility for the citizens enrolled in the Mitchell-Lama program. However, this does not just include the residents of 1520 Sedgwick, but the owners as well, for the government entered into an agreement with them as well.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Buck V. Jail Case Analysis
    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Buck V. Jail Case Analysis

    The Buck v. Bail court case during 1920's, is concreted to be one of the worst rulings of the Supreme Court in the history of American law. During the 1920’s court case in Virginia, the Supreme Court supported sterilization of so-called mental defectives or imbeciles American’s. The First person who was reported to undergo sterilization was a young poor woman by the name of Carrie Buck. According to the Buck v. Bail video Carrie Buck was confined in the Virginia State colony for the epileptics and the feeble-minded though she was neither epileptic nor mentally disabled, eight judges ruled that the state of Virginia had the right to sterilize her, her mother Emma and as well as her Daughter Vivienne (Democracy Now).…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Analysis
    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Analysis

    Introduction The Bill of Rights was passed in 1791. It is composed of the first 10 amendments proposed to the Constitution and encompasses a wide range of protections for American citizens (Lab et al., p. 41). One such protection comes from the fourth amendment which states, the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or things to be seized (Lab et at., p. 42).…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    District Of Columbia V. Heller Case Analysis
    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    District Of Columbia V. Heller Case Analysis

    The interpretation of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America has been a topic of controversy, ever since its acceptance over two-hundred years ago. One of the main issues with the amendment is, since its acceptance in 1791, many of the issues are now considered irrelevant and insignificant to our society today. One of the most well known Supreme Court cases is the infamous District of Columbia v. Heller case. It was the very first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. The District of Columbia v. Heller, plays a crucial and decisive role in our constitutional rights to bear arms for self defence.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz
    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Case Law 531 Week 3 Quiz

    Answer: Yes, Bo would be entitled to recover his $1,000 payment plus the $150 cost of clearing the land. He has the option to rescind his contract. Also, Sadia had knowledge and consent that Bo was going to had Lot No. 2 cleared of brush. Therefore, he should be able to get the money back for the cost of clearing the land. (g) Assume that on March 1.…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    R V Dudley And Stephens Case Study
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    R V Dudley And Stephens Case Study

    F= Facts: The case title is R.v. Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273. On May 19, 1884 a yacht set sail to Sydney, Australia from Southampton, England. There are four men involved in this case the crew of the Mignonette, Tom Dudley, Edwin Stephens, Edmund Brooks, and Richard Parker. The captain Dudley and crewman Stephens were charged with the murder of the cabin boy Parker.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings