Federalist 47: The Power Of The Government

Improved Essays
Federalist 47 argues that “the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands,” is a form of tyranny. The Foundering Fathers, especially the authors of the Federalist Papers were concerned with the powers of the executive, legislature and judiciary being consolidated into one area, due to the fear of totalitarianism. Thus, in Federalist 51, James Madison that “the power surrendered by the people,” to the United States of America’s government must be divided within the government to allow “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” Each branch, the executive, legislature and judiciary were given their own respective powers, and if one branch decided to expand their power, the other branches would stop that expansion in order to prevent their own powers being endangered. Therefore, in the U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 8, Congress is granted the power to declare war and the power to issue letters of marque and reprisal referring to hostilities short of full-scale war. The executive branch in Article 2 Clause 1, states that the president is the …show more content…
Constitution, the presidency has gained control of the country’s war powers through presidential actions and the failure of Congress to challenge the presidency’s actions. George Washington ordered militias from multiple states to attack Native American Tribes during the Indian Wars without seeking a declaration of war from Congress during the early 18th century. Abraham Lincoln after being elected to the presidency in 1860 the southern states seceded from the U.S. and formed the Confederate States of America. After the Southern states seceded, Lincoln ordered two blockades, the first being from South Carolina to Texas, the second was the ports of Virginia and North Carolina. All of which was done without a declaration of war, and Lincoln defended his actions by stating the “Constitution was nothing without the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    What would life be akin without the Constitution? Gradually, we would result in a tyrannical world. The thing that the colonists were endeavoring to eschew. What is a tyranny? A tyranny conventionally refers to when a person has an abundance of puissance on their hands, having consummate control.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The separated powers established in the Constitution are outlined in Federalist Papers 47 - 51. In Federalist #47 Publius states that Publius argued with this being the case, tyranny can be best prevented by arranging a system in which these powers can not become concentrated. In Federalist #51. Publius claims that the constitutional system makes each institution independent of each other. Furthermore, he states that the powers granted to each institution are in place to keeping the other two institutions in…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Federalist Papers 10 and 51, James Madison offers his insight upon the ends and means of government. He outlines his beliefs on human nature, representation, and separation of power. He sets out to explain the tendency of humans to create factions. These factions take away rights of the minority, hurting the government as a whole. Next, he discusses the advantages of a republic compared to a pure democracy.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitution Dbq Analysis

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Separating the powers of the central government and allowing them to control each other equally split the power in the government. Madison explained this separation by stating that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Doc. C) By separating the central government’s powers, no branch will be able to overpower the others and therefore protects against tyranny.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the failures of the Articles of Confederation, it was clear to the members of the Second Constitutional Convention that serious revisions to our government were necessary to have a prosperous nation. Thus the Constitution, with clear distinctions to the Articles, was drafted. James Madison, often cited as the Father of the Constitution, in conjunction with several other Federalist, like Alexander Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to persuade members of Congress and the states to ratify the document. Noted by history as two of the most influential pieces from the collection, The Federalist Papers, Federalist 10 and Federalist 51 stand out by there clear and persuasive arguments as to why and how a strong national government would protect its citizens.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Weaknesses

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In Constitution, Watts states that the Constitution “…sets out the basic structure and functions of the various branches of government” (1). These being the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Our founding fathers wanted our country to be free from tyranny of the government and of the people, so they created the three branches of government and the system of checks and balances to make sure that one group does not assume more power than the other. The new structure for our government fixed many of the problems related to the Articles of Confederation. Under the Constitution, the states are no longer sovereign and the laws of the federal government are supreme.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    James Madison, on the other hand, reasoned that the best government of the time, as it existed in Britain, and all of the colonies already practiced the same overlapping of powers that was found in the proposed constitution. In Federalist 48, Madison argues that it is this very overlapping of authority that preserves the separation of powers; “The conclusion which I am warranted in drawing from these observations is, that a mere demarcation on parchment of the constitutional limits of the several departments, is not a sufficient guard against those encroachments which lead to a tyrannical concentration of all the powers of government in the same hands” (Hammond, Hardwick, & Lubert, 2007, p. 494). He believed that his opponents had read Montesquieu but had not understood his notion of separation of powers clearly. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government simultaneously holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other” (Hammond, Hardwick, &…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ratified in March of 1781, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States of America with its first form of government. The Articles called for a loose confederation where each state continued to have its independence along with individual rights and powers. The Articles were less powerful than the state constitutions and were designed to be reactive, causing the national government to be significantly less powerful. After seeing the severe flaws the Articles contained, delegates gathered in a meeting known as the Philadelphia Convention, later named the Constitutional Convention where, unbeknownst to them, the Constitution would be created. Although the Constitution provided the United States with its first effective form of a democratic…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist No. 51

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written as a system of mapping out and outlining the structure of the United States’ new government. Having gained independence from Britain, the U.S. was searching for and debating about different forms of rule and the distribution of power in the government; many new Americans feared that the tyranny imposed by Britain on the colonies could be reinstated by a new overly powerful executive due to a lack of restrictions and an overabundance of authority. The Federalist Papers were a series of essays and pamphlets written by the Founding Fathers with the intention of convincing the public to support the ratification of the Constitution. Federalist Papers No. 51 and No. 10, both written by James Madison, were used to advocate for supporting a democratic republic structure of government. Federalist No. 51 discussed the protections sanctioned…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They include things such as “the President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,” but no where is it outlined that the President has the power to declare war. Nevertheless,…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States government was created to have three equal branches, the judicial, executive, and legislative and was helped by the writing of the Constitution by James Madison. Even with these practices established, many Presidents and the government have decided and shaped United States politics by how they interpret and analyze the Constitution. Over the course of United States history all of the different political parties that arise read the Constitution in different ways and believe the meaning to certain parts of the Constitution are different. These conflicts have also caused many power struggles to arise between the President and Congress, typically when the two sides disagree and are controlled by different political parties, resulting…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government in many ways, they did this in order to make sure that their system of government wouldn't get out of control. There is a check for everything, everything is in a system of order, so... here are some ways that The Constitution limited the powers of the federal government. For Example: The Great Compromise.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln closed the Southern ports and seized several boats before Congress had the chance to authorize the Civil War; in order to stop the South from getting imported goods to support the rebellion. Congress declared war with the South several months after the ports closures. The owners of the seized boats brought a suit, claiming the blockade was illegal. The Supreme Court ruled the blockade constitutional, because the President must be able to call out the military or navy when an invasion is imminent. Although, Congress acts alone when declaring war, the President must be able to stop the threat when Congress is not in session.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Answer to Question 1 (e) None of the above The first three articles of the U.S. Constitution outline the Separation of Powers Clause. The U.S. Constitution in Article I, Section I gives legislative powers to Congress. Article II, Section I, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution establishes an executive branch led by a President and Vice President. Meanwhile, Article III, Section I of the U.S. Constitution creates a judicial power composed of a Supreme Court, and “inferior courts.”…

    • 1833 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist papers played a crucial role in helping to quell the fears of Americans who didn’t want another King George III. In Federalist number 45, James Madison reassures Americans that the federal government was not given too much power, and that if the federal government became too strong or tyrannical, the states would be able to mitigate any effects (Madison 1788). Madison also states that the federal government is necessary for the prosperity of the people (Madison 1788). He claims that the powers of the federal government will not be dangerous to its people, for which he gives a few reasons. First of all, Madison argues that the federal government’s powers are few and specific, whereas the state powers are broad and unlimited.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays