Microeconomics deals with what individuals, families, and firms do; as well as why. It is a branch of economics in which studies the behavior of these individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the allocation of limited resources. One of its goals is to analyze market mechanisms and market failure. These market mechanisms include: market exchange, competitive markets, markets themselves, or labor markets. According to the textbook, Understanding Capitalism: Competition, Command, and Change, a market refers to the buying and selling activities of all those who want to trade a particular good or service. A market consists of suppliers wanting to sell and demanders wanting to buy. Market exchange occurs when the owner of a good or service
…show more content…
A labor market is a market in which workers sell their labor time, not work itself, in return for wage. Employers are the demanders, and the workers are the suppliers of labor time. The labor market also shares the same features of competition and conflict with the other markets. These labor markets are usually very competitive because there are usually many demanders for labor time and, in most cases, many suppliers of it. In labor markets, the conflict is between employers and workers. The issues causing these conflicts are wages, intensity of work, workplace safety, and often other things such as health and retirement benefits (Bowles et al., 2005).
The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market focuses the changes within the U.S. wage structure and inequality. This work shows when the overall wage inequality was most prevalent and describes this using wage distributions. Contributions to the growth in wage inequality is also addressed. As well as trying to comprehend a marked change in the evolution of the U.S. wage structure over the focused years, specifically the divergent trends in upper and lower-tail wage …show more content…
Labor Market, the wage inequality in the top half of the distribution has showed an unchecked secular rise for 25 years yet has stoped growing since the late 1980s in the bottom half of the wage distribution. The employment growth we show that the pattern of employment growth differed sharply in the 1990s versus the 1980s with more rapid growth of relative employment in jobs at the bottom and top of the wage distribution relative to the middle of the wage distribution. This pattern of employment growth is described as the “polarization” of the U.S. labor market. In this, employment increasingly polarizing into high-wage and low-wage jobs at the expense of traditional middle-skill jobs. We document that quantity and price changes positively throughout the distribution of earnings in the 1980s, when the wage structure was spreading monotonically, and in the 1990s, when the wage structure was polarizing. These patterns suggest a central role for labor demand shifts in explaining wage structure changes of the last twenty-five years (Autor et al., 2006). A criticism of the labor market is that it because people’s lives and wellbeing greatly depends on wages. The labor market can be exploited and laborers can be taken advantage of for unfair wages. Also, labor markets and analysis of these markets do not account for unpaid labor, such as internships. Although no exchange is being made other than experience from the “demander”, it is important
A labor market is a market in which workers sell their labor time, not work itself, in return for wage. Employers are the demanders, and the workers are the suppliers of labor time. The labor market also shares the same features of competition and conflict with the other markets. These labor markets are usually very competitive because there are usually many demanders for labor time and, in most cases, many suppliers of it. In labor markets, the conflict is between employers and workers. The issues causing these conflicts are wages, intensity of work, workplace safety, and often other things such as health and retirement benefits (Bowles et al., 2005).
The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market focuses the changes within the U.S. wage structure and inequality. This work shows when the overall wage inequality was most prevalent and describes this using wage distributions. Contributions to the growth in wage inequality is also addressed. As well as trying to comprehend a marked change in the evolution of the U.S. wage structure over the focused years, specifically the divergent trends in upper and lower-tail wage …show more content…
Labor Market, the wage inequality in the top half of the distribution has showed an unchecked secular rise for 25 years yet has stoped growing since the late 1980s in the bottom half of the wage distribution. The employment growth we show that the pattern of employment growth differed sharply in the 1990s versus the 1980s with more rapid growth of relative employment in jobs at the bottom and top of the wage distribution relative to the middle of the wage distribution. This pattern of employment growth is described as the “polarization” of the U.S. labor market. In this, employment increasingly polarizing into high-wage and low-wage jobs at the expense of traditional middle-skill jobs. We document that quantity and price changes positively throughout the distribution of earnings in the 1980s, when the wage structure was spreading monotonically, and in the 1990s, when the wage structure was polarizing. These patterns suggest a central role for labor demand shifts in explaining wage structure changes of the last twenty-five years (Autor et al., 2006). A criticism of the labor market is that it because people’s lives and wellbeing greatly depends on wages. The labor market can be exploited and laborers can be taken advantage of for unfair wages. Also, labor markets and analysis of these markets do not account for unpaid labor, such as internships. Although no exchange is being made other than experience from the “demander”, it is important