Underground Slavery Causes

Improved Essays
Another event that caused more tension between the North and South was the Dred Scott vs. Sanford case. In 1857, Dred Scott tried to sue his way out of being a slave. But the Supreme Court declared that Dred Scott would still remain a slave and that blacks were “so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect” (Trigger Events). This decision threatened to break the compromises remaining that had prevented from a civil war from happening.
In 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act forced the North to capture and return escaped slaves back to the South. This upset the North because they were against slavery and did not want to be involved with slavery at all (Trigger). This helped the South also. The Underground
…show more content…
For example, Alexander Stephens, Vice President of the Confederacy, said “The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us, the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the ‘rock upon which the old Union would split.’ He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact”(Slavery). Stephens was a major politician during the Civil War and was saying that slavery was the cause of the conflict that was happening between the two sides. However most people in the South could not afford slaves and people in the North were tradesmen or small farmers so they literally did not have a chance to see a slave (James). One big factor about slavery was that the South was heavily depended on it to keep its economy from collapsing. Slavery was a huge portion of the South’s economy (Civil). So with the North’s opposition towards slavery and the election of Abraham Lincoln, the South saw both of those things as a threat to its economy and threatened to secede in order to preserve slavery (Foner

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    On March 6, 1857, the Supreme Court decided the case Dred Scott v Sandford. In one of it’s most controversial rulings, the Supreme Court decided against Dred Scott, a slave that lived in Missouri. Conflict over the case was one of the major factors leading to the civil war. Dred Scott was a slave to army surgeon John Emerson. After buying Scott, Emerson moved to an army base in the Wisconsin territory, which was a free territory according to the Missouri Compromise.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, the Dred Scott decision empowered proslavery Southerners. The 1854 Dred Scott v. Standford case was brought all the way to Supreme Court and was regarding a slave who lived in an area illegal to slavery because of the Missouri Compromise and was suing Standford for freedom (Brands 2015, 323). This case caused controversy; Firstly, because slaves could not be citizens at the time therefore they should not be allowed to sue a citizen.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the Dred Scott case, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that he should be free but when his new master appealed to the United States Supreme Court, the decision was overruled. Northerners were angry over the decision and southerners were happy, but mad at the northerners defiance. The North was at a disadvantage as they only has Congress, and everything else was with the South.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America expanded quickly, but it didn’t come without controversy. The country was divided on whether slavery should flourish or be abolished. Slavery was dividing the country, with a Civil War in the makings. It is long debated what the cause was, and therefore it is unknown which specific event caused the war. The many speeches given by citizens and politicians, the Compromise of 1850, and the Dred Scott Decision are largely considered to be the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Tension

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The thought of Lincoln taking their slaves, despite his promise not to, led them to secession. In the years preceding the Civil War both sides were forced to concede points to avoid violence, but in the end, it only delayed the inevitable fighting and made those for and against slavery frustrated and ready to bear arms. As the country’s stakes on land increased in size so too did the stakes of the issue at hand. Gradually, as the year, 1860 approached Americans faced a matter that could not be left alone.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the mid-18th century, the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision became a key contributing factor in the separation between the Union and Confederacy going into the American Civil War. With the conflict of proslavery and antislavery groups fighting for new states, this choice became a debated topic within the detached United States for the effect it had in the slavery legal and economic system. Riots transpired and differences between political leaders and Court justices arose as the decision was made. Historical documents, like the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the U.S. Constitution, were used within this court case by Chief Justice Roger Taney to lead towards the defeat of Scott.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There was a hotheaded congressman that was from South Carolina, he was called the Union of a “foul monster.” Majority of South Carolina’s population was mostly made up slaves. He and the Carolinians were living in the state. To end their slavery, the federal authorities would have to establish tariffs. Slavery was at stake, according to John C. Calhoun with the “peculiar domestic institutions of the southern states.”…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stephens Talks about why the southern states secedes and create the confederacy. It seems that one of the reasons of why they did it is because of slavery. He talks about ideas that Jefferson and other leading political leaders of his time were wrong. That the ideas rested upon the assumption of equality of races, and that this was an error. This was talked about on the first page of the “Alexander H. Stephens, “cornerstone speech” .…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alyssa Khoury Mr. Brennan APUSH 1/1/16 Sectionalism in the 1800s In the early 1800s, sectionalism between the North and the South was based on slavery. While the North completely disagreed with the idea of slavery, the South was all for the idea of slavery. As more time has passed, slavery became a greater issue. Throughout the United States of America, life for the slaves had slightly changed.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements in political decisions became a large dividing factor between the North and the South, along with the growing disagreements between the North and the South in ideology. Even from the founding of the country the North and South had been divided. The Nullification crisis was the first event that highlighted the division between the North and South. The nullification crisis was the confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government in 1832–33 over the former's attempt to declare null and void within the state the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. The disagreement on the secession of South Carolina caused further disagreements between the North and South (Document A).…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When studied carefully, the historical significance of these two documents become very clear. From the significance of the cornerstone speech to the south and their movement at the time, to the significant differing views the north and south had of then president Abraham Lincoln. These documents help provide, at least, a glimpse of some of the issues that were forefront before, during and after the civil war. It is therefore important to be aware of some of the implications of these documents and the effects they might have had at the time. Beginning with Alexander H Stephens’ cornerstone speech, we are able to gain some type of understanding of his thinking and ultimately the reasoning for his support for the secession of the southern…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ordinance Of Nullification

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As Foote says, the “cotton capitalists” of the South at first believed that their interests were the same as “capitalists in general”; however, “anti-slavery and pro-tariff agitation was beginning to teach them otherwise” (10). In 1832, Southern protests over the tariff issue caused the state of South Carolina to threaten to secede from the Union. The state government instituted an “Ordinance of Nullification,” which was based on the view that an individual state has the right to refuse to obey a federally-imposed tariff law. In response, President Andrew Jackson’s administration claimed that the states do not have the right to either disobey federal laws or to secede from the Union.…

    • 1863 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Perspectives

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Civil War was a pivotal moment in the United States’s history being a high point in a sectional discord that’s affects have continued to be evident in several issues in today’s society. As most wars, there’s at least two decidedly divided and biased sides to the story. With two perspectives coming from one country America had to decide how they wanted to remember this war. Being such a complex dispute with two very distinct viewpoints, each side had their personal view on the reasons for the war, the events throughout the war, and the effectiveness of reconstruction. Through extensive measures by multiple people, each side go their story out and shaped how others viewed the war decades after the fact, no matter how contrasting these memories…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery strived long ago, where Africans were taken from their homes and sold to work on fields as servants and workers until they died. The slaves themselves went through the most painful experiences any human being could even think about. As slaves were to be obedient of their masters, some slaves decided that they would not live a life in these conditions so they started to resist the man in ways that slaves could do without losing their lives. In the television show, Underground, is shows the lives of slaves on a plantation and how they deal with the hardships in their day to day struggles. Out of all the characters, Noah, a blacksmith proves to be the most resilient character.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays