Unconquered In Anthem

Improved Essays
The Unconquered

“We are one in all and all in one. There are no men but the only great WE, One, indivisible and forever”. Equality-7521 is a frowned upon burden to the council and the leaders of society, as he has committed a crime for which there is no name for in the novella Anthem by Ayn Rand. He is born with an unbearable curse which none of his brothers have, the courage to seek and find knowledge. He knows he is evil but, towards the end of the story, feels no burden upon his spirit nor fear in his heart to resist the temptations of what secrets are being hidden from the unmentionable times. In the novella by Rand, there is no “I” or “me”, only the words “ours” and “we”. Equality lives in an age that has lost all trace of civilization
…show more content…
. In this essay, Rand describes in detail precisely what Equality’s leaders instruct. No matter where you are there is judgement which, in technical terms, would provide individualism. As Rand states in her essay, “There is no escape from the fact that men have to make choices... so long as moral values are at stake, normal neutrality isn’t possible” (7). Thus meaning that in societies like equality's, mysticism is rejected, as well as individualism. Being that the leaders of the society in the novel that Equality is housed in believes the great truth of all is, as stated in Anthem, “that all men are one and that there is no will save the will of all men together” (20), which creates an irrational society, also nothing more than “moral cowards, paralyzed by the absence of the self principles” (17) as Rand describes in the essay. All in all, I believe that Equality would agree with Rand in the essay How Does One Lead a Rational Life in an Irrational Society? And the advice she has on dealing with an irrational society. Concluding that all moral agnosticism is is nothing more than, as Rand finally says in the essay, “an escape from the responsibility of moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Role Of Creon In Antigone

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No one was holding Creon’s hand while he was dictating over the people of Thebes, nor did someone command him to create a law stating that you can not bury Polyneices or even pray for him,or willing to kill his own niece Antigone. No, Creon acted alone in all of his dreadful decisions. ”A good man yields when he knows his course is wrong and repairs the evil. The only crime is pride” As Hamien says this to Creon, he is telling him that he isn 't a good leader because he did not see the flaw in his ruling. “A good man repairs evil”, Creon has only created more.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The laws say that none among men may be alone, ever and at any time, for this is the greatest transgression and the root of evil.” (1) The quote from the book shows that all men must be with other men for the fear of starting something evil. It also shows how the City Council believes in collectivism because all men must stay together or else they've done the greatest sin. Everyone must be the same, according to the City Council, because they don't believe a man should do anything to help him and not his…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the novella Anthem they have a devote “truth” that all of man should share the same thoughts and have no other thing to do than that which helps all of his brothers. Equality however goes against this thought process in every action he does in the novella, by going into the tunnel, steeling pages and a writing utensil, and thinking for himself. The quote he says has a deeper meaning than its words set forth, when he says all men he doesn’t mean just one group he literally means any and all people in his or any society, and by secrets he doesn’t mean some treasure, he means things that could help such as electricity. When he says only for those who will seek it he means only those of which will do as he did and stand up against…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Imagine a world where one cannot fail nor excel, create nor break boundaries, and love nor hate any one person more than another. Evil and good intentions are tightly woven in Ayn Rand 's Anthem, the story of Equality 7-2521, a man cursed to constantly question the world around him. His city is built on the foundation that all people "exist through, by and for our brothers who are the State" (21). The novella is set in a totalitarian future, but lacks the futuristic ideas that similar stories are often overflowing with. Equalitiy 's experiences in a world that knows the candle to be the greatest invention suggests that for scientific and technological advancements to take place, there must be acceptance, defiance, and desire.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equality feels that he is alone but when writing he use we because he could be punished for “being alone”. “The issue has been perverted and man has been left no alternative - and no freedom” (Rand, The soul of the Individualist). When no man has the freedom to do want they want, the council can put anything is there mind. How one should live or die, the council has them announce a saying for when they feel alone. Equality shows how he feels alone but is not able to express it without the unspeakable word.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By offering no background for Frankenstein’s life, before college, and removing the friends and family characters in the movie, the audience is left with only the assumption that he must be a mad scientist with no other motivation beyond a God complex. Not only do Victor’s loved ones escape the creature’s wrath, they are never even in danger, more so no wrath exists due to the undeveloped character of the monster. Frankenstein never has worry upon his shoulders in regards to his actions. No one dies, so he is never struck with the grief and regret described in the novel, either. It is understandable for producers to cut scenes and characters for time restrictions pertaining to films, but such an enormous amount of content is left…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the text, Yossarian’s character is defined as selfish and aimless and thus he valued himself more than anything else. He valued neither fame nor fortune; all Yossarian desired was to live a long life, whether or not it was meaningful. He had no concern over who won the war because he strongly believed that if he had died, it did not matter; alternatively if he survived, he had accomplished his only mission - survival. Yossarian despised war and arrived at the conclusion that war was fruitless combat where “everyone was trying to kill him” (Orwell 34). On the other hand, Achilles, who was regarded as the greatest warrior to ever live, had a very different purpose when having to fight in the Trojan War.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Baraban states,“It destroys any hope in Montresor's humanity and highlights once again that Montresor feels no guilt regarding the murder”(Baraban). Baraban is saying Montresor has no sympathy towards the actions he committed, and has always been a seeking revenge on Fortunato because of the hate inside of him. Montresor is a psychopath because he has no feeling of guilt or regret after murdering Fortunato. Montresor’s attitude changes from just a man wanting revenge to a murderous man with only happiness, and satisfaction in mind now that his nemesis is dead. Montresor’s character never changes, but his attitude does.…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within his theories, the poorest man can kill the richest man because they are protected by the fact that in Hobbes’ society everyone is considered equal. Everything was very competitive but this all came naturally within each other not by the government or from any other cause for that matter. In “Leviathan”, the bible is something that is quoted on almost every single page, whereas, “The First and Second Discourses” does not quote the bible at all. Rousseau does not necessarily disagree with Hobbes on his theory of state of nature but nonetheless says it was not told in the correct way. This is the main point that I will be discussing throughout this paper.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He resolutely asserts that “ taking all forms of injustice into account, none is more deadly than that practiced by people who act as if they are good men when they are being most treacherous,”. Machiavelli’s rejection of natural law destroys any hope for justice. He obliterates the telos of society, which is the pursuit of justice and the common good. Hobbes rejects this disregard for natural law, thus saving the telos of society. However, Machiavelli’s deception exceeds…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays