Stating that long-standing political practices are incompatible with the ever globalizing societies. Beck, refers to the current generation as the ‘me-first’ generation; that is tremendously individualistic. However he states that individualism is not necessarily a negative aspect rather a positive new sense of moral and political outlook. He states that because the current generation so called ‘freedoms children’ is very individualistic; thus more narcissistic, hedonistic, and self-aware, they are therefore more passionate and morally aware about a wider range of issues around the world. Furthermore the author insists that "institutionalized individualism" should not be confused with Thatcherism or market individualism or atomisation. As institutionalized individualism does not refer to restraining government spending or tax cuts neither is it set up to be solely profit oriented but rather a basis for a world …show more content…
Modernity conferring to Beck approach refers to political freedom, citizenship and civil society. Beck infers that “People are better adapted to the future than are social institutions and their representatives.” (Beck, 2) Asserting that due to individualism people are already moving towards becoming a cosmopolitan society. However political bodies are bound by many national bound limitations thus are unable to likewise adapt. Furthermore individualism in terms of modernity can be seen as “Thinking of oneself and living for others at the same time, once considered a contradiction in terms, is revealed as an internal, substantive connection. Living alone means living socially.” (Beck, 3) This represents a substantial cultural shift in modern society which Beck hopes would lead to a legally sanctioned individualism for everyone globally, where everyone has the right to