Tyranny Of The Minority Analysis

Improved Essays
According to Mill, the tyranny of the majority is suppressing the individual liberty of the minority. This concept pertains to a democratic government or institution controlling the overall interest of their citizens. Through political functionaries, the government has the ability to manipulate the majority’s interest, in which can ultimately assist the governments will over the minority population. This notion is dangerous in a democratic society because the fundamental principles of a democracy are liberty and equality. Therefore, limitations on institutions are dynamic in safeguarding the civil liberty for every individual’s values and beliefs.
Mill thinks it is wrong to silence dissenters because every individual has the freedom of speech.

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I agree with both Steven and Dan. The meaning of tyranny of the majority can be broken down. Tyranny means cruel, unreasonable, or arbitrary use of power or control. I feel that tyranny of the majority is an oppression by the majority to the minority. I think if you are part of the majority that your mind conforms to what everyone else in the majority thinks.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Choose One: Power Happines Freedom For all of history there has existed the struggle between the strong and the weak. The establishment of government gives the power to a particular group to decide the amount of freedom the majority is allowed, however, though not ideal it provides necessary order. The benefits of security that limitations on freedom provides must be balanced with the individual's pursuit of happiness for citizens to be content. To prevent the governed majority from destabilizing the rulers and seeking power, the government will oppress political and personal freedom of thought. In result, the majority will live under the illusion of contentment and not wish to revolt; those enlightened to the idea that the government should be ruled by the governed, would associate happiness only with ignorance and consequently seek freedom.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vega 1 Breanna Vega Professor Olmos English 101 23 April 2016 Citizens Rule Democracy is known to be a strong form of government, because it gives full power to the people of the nation. Many argue about how a democracy works, but do not understand it includes difficult tasks for it to be successful. In Cornel West’s reading, “The Deep Democratic Tradition in America,” the idea of a strong democracy is by the people, but the promise of a democracy has failed. In order to keep the promise of strong democracy individual practices such as voting rights, the principle of protection, and the representation of each individual must be practiced under no circumstances.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill On Dissent Opinions

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mill asserts that there exists a “peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion…, robbing the human race… [and] those who dissent from the [unpopular] opinion, still more than those who hold it.” Mill supports his assertion that silencing one individual is equivalent to silencing mankind itself by exploring the consequences to not only the dissent opinions, but also the prevailing majority beliefs, and ultimately society as a whole. Mills abstractly states that if the dissent opinion was in fact true, individuals who perpetuated the censorship lost “opportunity of exchanging error for truth,” and if the dissent opinion was false, the majority loses the ability to gain “the clearer perception and livelier impression of the truth, produced…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In On Liberty, John Stuart Mill stated, “Society can and does execute its own mandates, practicing a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression” (Mill76). Meaning in democracy, there does…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many individuals believe liberty is tied to democracy, and political choice is extremely important to Mill. Mill believes that the best form of government is Representative Government. In Representative Government, an individual has the ability to protect himself and his views. As Mill says, “Let a person have nothing to do for his country, and he will not care for it.” Meaning that if you do not let an individual have a choice, then he will have no motivation to be productive for society as a whole.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    A treatise on liberty and freedom of speech, John Stuart Mill’s 1859 book On Liberty employs philosophical thought to discuss the importance of liberty and when it is or is not right and proper for a government to limit it. In discussing liberty, Mill propositions the “harm principle,” a concept used throughout On Liberty to assess what rights and liberties mankind has, and when they ought to and ought not be curtailed by either the government or societal majorities, with which Mill is more concerned. The harm principle goes roughly as such: mankind has all liberties and privileges up to and not exceeding the ability to override or curtail the freedom of others. This includes the right to act in a manner not consistent with safety, morality, or any other general public concept of what is “good,” as long as the palpable negative consequences of one’s behavior are not assigned to or shared with another person unwillingly, but harms the actor only. The word “palpable” is key here, as Mill goes out of his way to clarify what exactly harm is, defining it as the consequence of an action taken by a given individual that causes realistic damage or injury to another individual, such as that the second person is measurably worse off than…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    He states, “In all such cases there should be personal freedom, legal and social, to do the action and stand the consequences” (Mill, 64). But, in defining freedom, as expressed earlier,…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Minority status is a significant factor associated with reports of delinquency in school because of the increase in zero-tolerance policies and heavy policing in and around schools. Many minority students in these schools are given suspension and referred to the police which is not correcting the actions of students but merely pushing them aside. Another big factor has to do with the history of discrimination that has created race-based disparity economically and socially. Discrimination still occurs today in education because children of color are often pushed to go to schools that are underfunded and placed in bad neighborhoods.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin On Liberty written by John Stuart Mill, chapter one is focused on an introduction to his meaning of Liberty. Mill explains that his purpose is to explain liberty dealing with civil and society and not “liberty of the will.” Liberty was first founded on the concept of protecting society against tyranny. His wanting to limit the power of the leaders in tyranny because while it was necessary to tell people what can and cannot be done, it is also seen as dangerous. Mill used the analogy of weak members being preyed upon by vultures.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major effects of democracy in Africa is division. Because Africa is one of the most diverse continents if not the most in the world in terms of ethnicity, and religion, western democracy takes this opportunity to tear it apart. One of the tools that it uses to achieve this is the multiparty system. Hence, it focusses more on elections in Africa than on most of the pressing needs of the continent, such as food, shelter, medical care and education (Mountain, 2012). Most political parties on the continent are formed based on tribal lines which in the end leads electorates to vote for leaders from their tribes or ethnic groups.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Democracy

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The most challenging form of government in a country for both politicians and the people is ‘democracy’. The term democracy is defined as ‘the rule of the people’ where the concept of it is to work on the people to obey the rules that have been made by the people’s determined system of making rules. In today’s world, democracy is the only legal and practical system of government that is approved by most of the people in most countries. Rather than just a single unique set of government institutions, (Schmitter & Karl, 1991) democracy rests upon a well understood group of values, attitudes, practices and all, which may take different forms and expressions among different cultures and societies around the world with the values of tolerance,…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays