Tyranny Is The Most Perfect Of All Possible Governments

Decent Essays
“A monarchy conducted with infinite wisdom and infinite benevolence is the most perfect of all possible governments.”. Ezra Stiles that a monarchy with all the power, no limits or restrains is the best government compared to other ones. “Accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”. What I think James Madison was trying to explain was that if you give one person all the power and no limits then it’s a tyranny. I agree with James Madison’s quote the most because if a ruler has all of the power in government and uses it to their advantage then it is dictatorship/tyranny. An example of tyranny or absolutism would be a ruler like King Louis XIV.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    of C.’s lack of authority (which is necessary when running a government to some degree) James Madison expresses that just because one certain state does not side with the majority it has delayed the reformation of a more efficient government. (Doc. A) This shows how incapable the A. of C. was at the time unlike the constitution which only requires a ⅔ vote to pass an amendment.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carmelo Figueroa Per. 4 November 2, 2017 How Did the Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? Tyranny is one of the reasons that governments have gone to anarchy; People have rebelled and started riots or even wars due to the oppression of tyranny. The founding fathers of America wanted a government that was strong, but not too strong.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny Dbq

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a technical democracy, has a 100% voter turnout, but is an indisputable tyranny. There must be guards against tyranny in a proper democracy, such as the United States of America (US). The Constitution of the US (COTUS) was created in 1787, at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, with fears of tyranny in mind. So, what are the guards against tyranny in COTUS? Tyranny is a situation in which all power is placed in the hands of a single entity and typically used in reference to government.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Essay On Tyranny

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Can you imagine how life would be in america if we weren’t protected from tyranny. Thanks to the constitution we don’t have to worry about that ever happening. In 1787 our founding fathers met in philadelphia to discuss a big problem, which was the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of confederation was considered as America’s first constitution. After much discussion and debate they decided that the articles of confederation would no longer be utilized.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first major claim he makes is that the three governmental branches will seek to be independent from each other in an attempt to keep their governmental powers from being encroached upon. This is particularly explicit from Madison in Federalist 51, “But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.” Again, the idea of separate branches comes as a central point in the containment of federal powers. Additionally, Madison also recognizes that the legislature will always be the more powerful branch and is once again stopped from becoming too powerful by use of the bicameral system (Federalist…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lesly Juarez Professor Nolan English 1A 25 March 2017 Systems of Government Thomas Jefferson and Hannah Arendt had different and similar perspectives on the way a government should govern its people. They both agreed that people should be free of tyranny. In both of their views, people were being controlled by people who would only cause harm and fear. Jefferson stated in the Declaration of Independence “A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free People” (121).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I wasn't alive back when we were ruled by queens and kings but it sounds pretty unfair and horrible. Luckily for us americans, nowadays we have the constitution to protect us from tyranny. After we gained independence from Britain we needed a strong government that would help from making the same mistakes that went wrong with Britain. Those rules, you may find, as the Constitution. How does the constitution protect against tyranny?…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the seventeenth century, Europe was undergoing drastic movements such as the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment. These movements significantly impacted a citizen’s relationship with their government, how they practiced religion, and their overall perception of the role and capabilities of institutions. Not only were these new ideas present in Europe, but they also diffused to colonies such as America. During the period 1607 to 1754, Enlightenment philosophy influenced Americans politically by causing colonists to view their government as an institution designed to serve their needs and ensure their natural rights, religiously by inspiring Americans to practice their faith without dependency on religious officials in societies such…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many monarchs during the seventeenth century used absolutism as a governing force to rule their lands. During the reign of Louis XIV, Jean Domat wrote a profound document in which he addressed all areas of government and outlined what he believed to be the tenets of an absolute monarchy. This document, entitled “On Social Order and Absolute Monarchy” defined what he believed to be the basis of absolutism and class structure in regards to the law of God and the law of nature. Absolutism is as form of government where unrestricted, complete power is retained by a centralized sovereign individual. Domat displays immense support of the concept of absolutism and outlines the idea that the people should show loyalty to their one appointed leader who is chosen by God.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August second, 1776, fifty-six men signed a piece of paper that would change the course of the nation’s history; The Declaration of Independence. One of the most famous signatures on the Declaration of Independence is the one belonging to John Hancock, as it was more predominant than the others, as it was larger and so drew the eyes of the population as the threat of war loomed over the colonies. Those who courageously signed the document were knowingly putting their lives and the lives of others at stake, and so a strong burden was placed on to their shoulders. However, one question still looms. Did John Hancock really sign the document with a large scribble, or were the others too afraid to change their ways, and stand for the rights written…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism is a political solution where the monarchy controls every facets of government with no checks or balances, it was initially introduced by the English by Kings, James and Charles I. Although it was introduced in the England (maybe Spain) it never did take hold mainly because of an established parliament that was so strongly ingrained into the English process of government. On the other hand, Louis XIV was able to secure an absolute monarchy and take it to extremes. He was able under the precept of “Divine Right” and claiming to be servant of God. This would allow Louis XIV to dissolve the Estates-General (a general assembly). Louis XIV is the poster child of what an absolute monarch is supposed to be and had no issue in letting the people of France know his status.…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism was a political theory created by the following individuals; Jean Bodin, Thomas Hobbes (somewhat), and Bishop Bossuet. The era of absolutism was a time, 16th to 18th centuries, when monarchs ruled with all power to themselves in most countries, especially in France. Absolutism was favored among monarchs because it gave them complete power over their country and did not have to answer to anyone but themselves. Western absolutist France and eastern countries were similar by focusing on military aspects such as spending money to build large and powerful armies to win wars and gain land, and using increased taxation on lower classes to gain money, as well as monarchs ruling as the sovereign of that state. Eastern and western absolutism…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many years ago our founding fathers made a government without tyranny, they were smart to do this because they didn't want to have all the power in the hands of one person or group. Delegates (55) gathered in Philadelphia at the Constitutional Convention to frame a government without too much power in the hands of one person or a group. The Constitution was signed September 17, 1787. How did these framers protect us from tyranny ? They wanted to create a government without tyranny and they did by creating federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, and the small state big state compromise.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolutism Vs Monarchy

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Absolutism is known for being under a single leader. Many have stated that “monarchical government is the best.” In The Theory of Divine Right absolute monarch was the “most natural” which lead to it being the “most durable” and “strongest.” With the government under a single ruler it could also lead to it being the “most opposed to divisiveness”, “worst evil of states”, and the “most certain cause of their ruin.” In many societies absolutism “works in harmony” with everything.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout their writing, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and J.S. Mill hold differing views on freedom. At the same time, each highlights different impediments to freedom. In this paper, I argue that the obstacles to freedom that they see leads to different ideas of freedom and subsequently divergent ideas concerning the role of government and society in cultivating these freedoms. Hobbes holds to freedom as the right to the simple preservation of one’s life, while Locke extends this idea to include the protection of liberty and property as well. J.S. Mill goes far beyond these two thinkers to include the freedom from the tyranny of the majority, and specifically, the oppression of tradition and culture.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays