because One way this will happen is if that one branch tried to pass a law the two other branches could veto against it stopping it from passing. Another way One more is say if the president performed acts that went against the constitution the Judicial Branch could declare those acts unconstitutional and stop him or her. Then their are the things that could go wrong as if they were to get to separated they could lose control of one another. InAs in the words of James Madison “... the constant aim to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… ( The three branches ) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Document C) So yes this can happen but not
because One way this will happen is if that one branch tried to pass a law the two other branches could veto against it stopping it from passing. Another way One more is say if the president performed acts that went against the constitution the Judicial Branch could declare those acts unconstitutional and stop him or her. Then their are the things that could go wrong as if they were to get to separated they could lose control of one another. InAs in the words of James Madison “... the constant aim to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other… ( The three branches ) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” (Document C) So yes this can happen but not