(2014) showed that even topical applications of fluoride don’t have much additional benefits if fluoride toothpaste is already being used. In their study, preschool children were either assigned to a experimental or placebo group. The experimental group was given biannual fluoride varnish applications and the control was given a placebo, additionally both groups brushed their teeth with 1000 ppm fluoride toothpaste (Agouropoulos et al., 2014). Their results showed that there was no significant difference between the control and the experimental group as can be seen in Figure 1. As a baseline, 37.8% of the control group had cavities, and after two years, 65.8% had cavities (Agouropoulos et al., 2014). If this is compared to the experimental group, with a baseline of 37.5% having cavities and 64.8% having cavities after two years (Agouropoulos et al., 2014), the difference is very small. From this, it cannot be shown that using a fluoride varnish has any effect on reducing the probability of getting
(2014) showed that even topical applications of fluoride don’t have much additional benefits if fluoride toothpaste is already being used. In their study, preschool children were either assigned to a experimental or placebo group. The experimental group was given biannual fluoride varnish applications and the control was given a placebo, additionally both groups brushed their teeth with 1000 ppm fluoride toothpaste (Agouropoulos et al., 2014). Their results showed that there was no significant difference between the control and the experimental group as can be seen in Figure 1. As a baseline, 37.8% of the control group had cavities, and after two years, 65.8% had cavities (Agouropoulos et al., 2014). If this is compared to the experimental group, with a baseline of 37.5% having cavities and 64.8% having cavities after two years (Agouropoulos et al., 2014), the difference is very small. From this, it cannot be shown that using a fluoride varnish has any effect on reducing the probability of getting