Two Years Are Better Than One By Liz Addison Summary

Waste of Two Years In the article “Two Years Are Better Than One,” Liz Addison responds to Rick Perlstein’s opinion about the importance of college. She uses herself as an example of how community college worked out for her. As a two-time community college student, she objectifies her experience as an open door of endless possibilities. With just one O’level at the beginning of her first college experience, she was able to precede into an American Community College, which she was forever grateful. Beginning with such little knowledge, she left community college with a head of of dreams; “How can Mr. Perlstein say college does not matter anymore?” argues Addison. As an advocate of community college, she believes that it’s the place to begin a journey of resources to unlimited knowledge. In discussion of Addison, she goes forward in admiration about the benefits of community college.; the ideal place for anyone who decides to go to college. It’s a program where none are left out. It allows students to enter school with a fresh start; giving them a chance to build their knowledge little by little. There is no such thing as mandatory knowledge when entering community college, therefore so many people are able to rely on the hidden gem that most take for granted. …show more content…
The whole point of school is to entice employers with an appealing resume. Social Darwinists would certainly take issue with this argument that this society is surrounded with the theory of survival of the fittest. When taking schools and experience into account, the employers will most likely choose someone from a renowned university rather than a community college. By going to a university, it shows that students are more invested in their future; which also makes them more reliable in their abilities to satisfy the