Two Tier Politics Analysis

Improved Essays
Noa Merritt
Professor Skerry
American Politics
April 10, 2015
Why Two-Tier Politics Are Essential to Govern the State

To some, the idea that elected individuals, whose political views are unknown to the people that adhere to them and are left to make decisions affecting the livelihood of a state may seem immoral. In the United States however, this is the reality we have become accustom to and have been able to progress as a nation, while American politics remain two-tiered. The people of the state leave the power in the hands of politicians who they believe are highly capable of making the decisions that will benefit the majority. Though it may seem wrong to not consult the views of the people, the politicians that make these decisions are
…show more content…
By examining the works of Charles McWilliams, Dennis Judd, Charles Hamilton and the view points of many others alike, we are able to both characterize Two-Tier politics as well as understand how it is manifested in American politics today. Because of this division between the state and people, the government is able to eliminate the problems created by highly opinionated people. Rather the voice of everyone, the beliefs of the people are served on a silver platter while at the same time, taking away their ability to conjure their own outlooks and ideas and create unwanted tension between state and people. By eliminating their ability to formulate their own political views, the qualified intellectuals, who have been elected to these positions of …show more content…
Unlike the early forms we examined in the works of Charles Hamilton and Dennis Judd, the division of state no longer focuses on those low income families, but those who are financial stable are targeted as well. To understand this separation, we must first examine what a public interest group is. Public interest groups can be defined as an interest group that attempts to influence legislation through the use of lobbying techniques and propaganda. These public interest groups select public concerns and or social issues they feel the people support. Often, the group leaders tend to define the problem, label causes and assess ways to deal with the social issue. With the use of propaganda and other forms of marketing, they sell their ideas and views to the public; primarily those who are economically stable, in an attempt to gain financial support to their cause. Often, these wealthy supporters do not have time to become directly involved in the efforts affiliated with the social issue they feel strongly about and so help out in the only way they feel they can, by donating large sums of money to their group of choice. By doing this, the supporter’s feel like they are making a difference in the issue and that with their donation, their voice is being heard through the representatives of the group. In reality, they do not know exactly where there money goes nor do

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Mohammad Shakhwar HIS-103-11651 Professor Cory Davis When you look at what is happening in American politics today, you hear all the time that politics has never been so divisive. That we as a nation are more divided than ever. This may be true, however there has always been a deep divide in the country going all the way back to the nation’s founding.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ultimate goal of most politically inclined interest group are to shape public polices in way that it supports the group’s interests, values, or beliefs. This goal is accomplished in two strategies in which sometimes both is used, one is the electoral strategy which is an attempt to influence the selection of public officials. Second strategy is the legislative strategy which is to influence the decisions that elected officials, bureaucrats, or members of the judiciary make. For those interests groups that decide to use the electoral strategy they do so by using tactics such as campaign spending, endorsements, voter mobilization and education, and…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States, our government is made up of people with different political ideologies and assertions. Our association with certain political parties is an example of our differences. Republicans and Democrats throughout history have represented the interests of their supporters rightfully. Conservatives have contrasting views upon the economy, social issues, and international policy. Liberals uphold democracy to its highest standards and support an equal political community.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Neither Tocqueville nor the authors of the Federalist Papers view an enlightened and virtuous citizenry as wholly essential to the Constitutional system, but while the federalists build institutions to defend the government against the self-interested passions of the people, Tocqueville sees the greatest benefits of the American political system where the government and the people meet: in the township and in political associations. The Federalists believe that the core of the Constitution system’s success lies in its institutions rather than the people. Their writings repeatedly show doubt in the abilities of the public to govern, construct institutions to defend against their involvement, limiting their civic duties to elections. Tocqueville,…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are many factors that are seen as threats to the United States’ welfare. More specifically, demagogues are often seen as threats to our democracy. These individuals seek support by appealing to emotions, popular desires, and prejudices—rather than by rational argument. During the Great Depression there was a remarkable and powerful, Huey Long. He was the governor of Louisiana, and a presidential candidate in the 1932 presidential election.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The promise of America has always been that it would be a government by the people, for the people. However, gerrymandering is and ever-looming threat to American ideals, and is potentially one of the biggest threats to equal representation for Americans. By further understanding what this phenomenon is and how the nature of undermined representation manifests itself though the gerrymandering of congressional districts, it can be deduced how basic American values are potentially compromised through these actions. To gain a more holistic view on America’s tradition of gerrymandering, it is important to first grasp the basics and then the relationship the facts have with American ideals in order to properly understand the true extent gerrymandering has on American values.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Beginning with the election of 1848, America began to see the dismantlement of the long-standing two party system as it no longer met the needs of the American people. Slavery became a central issue of upcoming presidential and congressional elections alike; people were no longer voting for the party they might have previously aligned with but rather for the party and candidate that most closely shared their views on the issue of slavery. The old party system didn’t address this issue as successfully as the nation needed, as can be seen with the Whig party, a once power political group, that quickly fell apart as slavery became more and more of a national concern. As the years progressed, and the issue of slavery became more and more polarizing,…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is the world’s worst kept secret - politicians want to get reelected. To accomplish this goal, they will have to convince their constituents that they deserve it. They may face the misfortune of being in a state where their party is not favored - perhaps they won the seat to begin with because their opponent was simply unacceptable, even though the state identifies with the ideology of their opponent’s party. In these kinds of situations, the candidate’s charasma and good will may go a long way in securing the candidate’s election. Perhaps, the issue in achieving reelection is that the President of the United States from the opposing party is not letting them pass pieces of legislation.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political parties tend to limit politicians and presidents to two different ideologies and new, innovative ideas are really heard over the buzz of homogeneous mindless party loyalists. Once again, Goldberg looks back at our founders as an example. “Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton, they did not rely on precedent and past political systems. The constitution is a flexible, innovative, creative document that transcends particular stifling ideologies” he…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In E.J. Dionne Jr.’s book, Our Divided Political Heart, He explores the various factors contributing to the great political polarization existing in America today. A reoccurring theme throughout the book describing this phenomenon is the perpetually diverging ideals of individualism and communitarianism. Traditionally Republicans have supported the concept of individualism, while democrat favor greater community orientation. We no longer have a Republican and Democratic parties that consists of individuals with moderate ideals. There now exists two opposing ends of the political spectrum with both conservative and liberal extremists.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The American Congress reader” edited by Steven Smith, Jason Roberts, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen, the first chapter opened up detailing what is wrong with the American political system. In the article, John Hibbing…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morgan Garcia Professor Crammer Political Science 21 April 2015 America’s Finest Model of Representation As a Democratic country our nation thrives on the basic ideology that we are properly represented in our government; where our voices are being heard and that decisions are fairly being made in the favor of the people. The major dilemma with representation is deciding what model of representation is best suited for the constituents. The Trustee Model of Representation and the Delegate Model of Representation are on opposite sides of the spectrum when it comes to deciding what is good and proper for American citizens and their different ideologies conflict with each other in every way. While the Delegate Model of Representation caters…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every nation and country has a way of running itself; a way to govern what is considered lawful and unlawful. In the United States of American, there is a massive controversial debate about whether our democracy is majoritarian or if it is more pluralistic in nature. Some may argue that the mass public, or every citizen in the country, is able to control the government’s actions. Others will state that many groups are able to work together amongst themselves to be able to allow more involvement of the citizens in a majority of the nation’s decisions. Both of these ideas of how our government works are similar in ways as well as different in many other ways.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vanessa Hernandez Timothy Wood, Political Communication October 1st, 2017 Reading Response I Jürgen Habermas, proposed in his 1962 article, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, his epic idea of a “single dominant public sphere” where citizens gather in order to debate “common concern.” Due to the inevitability of marginalization, the realities of human nature, and the illusory ideal that citizens are equipped with the necessary knowledge to rationally debate what should be common concern, it is not desirable in a democracy to have a single dominant public sphere. The single public sphere is outrageous because within one single mass there stand numerous limitations.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays