It provides good quality information about World War I and also has a short video that can help the reader understand the text better. Also, source two has a timeline, a map with the Allied, Central, and Neutral Powers, and a casualty graph of the amount killed in each country during World War I. All these extra features provide the reader with more knowledge and less confusion while reading the text. However, the text has complex words that may confuse the reader. For example in source two it says, “with Serbia already much aggrandized by the two Balkan Wars, Serbian nationalists turned their attention back to the idea of “liberating” the South Slavs of Austria-Hungary” (britannica.com). This proves that the text uses terms and words that the author expects the reader to know rather than source one where it explains terms and uses simpler words compared to source
It provides good quality information about World War I and also has a short video that can help the reader understand the text better. Also, source two has a timeline, a map with the Allied, Central, and Neutral Powers, and a casualty graph of the amount killed in each country during World War I. All these extra features provide the reader with more knowledge and less confusion while reading the text. However, the text has complex words that may confuse the reader. For example in source two it says, “with Serbia already much aggrandized by the two Balkan Wars, Serbian nationalists turned their attention back to the idea of “liberating” the South Slavs of Austria-Hungary” (britannica.com). This proves that the text uses terms and words that the author expects the reader to know rather than source one where it explains terms and uses simpler words compared to source