Two Arguments Against Federalism

Improved Essays
Show More
These two arguments have unalike mind sets on how they view Federalism. Federalism is a when a system of government is controlled by two different types of government. This is a governmental change that needed to be implicated back during this time for an at ease running government. For instance, within the government there will be two groups that control certain parts this divides it up, likewise with making things easier for people. These two articles are total opposites of each other. James Madison believes that federalism needs to be put into the government while, Patrick Henry is trying everything in his power to fight federalism.

Madison and Henry both did an excellent job at connecting with people by giving examples of what they thought

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Patrick Henry Dbq
    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Patrick Henry Dbq

    Patrick Henry at a Debate in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5 1788, and James Madison, in the Federalist, Number 10, 1787 represent two different perspectives on the ratification of the constitution. Anti-federalists and federalists were opposing forces in the ratification process. Anti-federalists wanted to prevent the constitution from being ratified while the federalists favored a strong central government and the passage of the constitution. Anti-federalists were against the ratification of the constitution. They feared the constitution could lead to autocratic tyranny.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    The Purpose Of The Anti-Federalist No. 51
    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Purpose Of The Anti-Federalist No. 51

    When the founding fathers were writing the constitution, there was much debate as to how strong they would allow the central government to become. For the Anti-Federalists in particular, it was important that the Constitution ensured the oppression the Americans had experienced under British rule could not be repeated. The purpose of Madison writing Federalist No. 51 was to convince Anti-Federalists, particularly those concentrated in New York, that the constitution would prevent the government from becoming too strong. If it were not ensured that the three branches of government would be independent of one another, and that a checks and balances system would be in place, it would have been more difficult for the constitution to have been ratified.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists Vs. Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists
    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalists Vs. Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

    Gage Lozano Perception Recently gaining independence from Great Britain was a notable achievement for the new country of America, but a great divide in the thoughts and actions that would determine the fate of the government became increasingly uneasy. Two opposing ways of thinking evolved and battled for how we would establish our country: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. While both seemingly concerned for the well being of the country, the predominant factor that separates Anti-Federalist Mery Otis Warren from Federalist James Madison is the perception they had over the citizens in their relation to the government. James Madison was concerned with the stability a republic could provide, while Mery Otis Warren wanted to ensure that the government was small, secure, and did not become to powerful or aristocratic. Raised by a wealthy family and very well educated, James Madison easily became a dominant figure in politics.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists
    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    In 1787, the New America had won her independence from England, yet a vacuum had been created which forced the need to form a new governmental system. This system would allow the people to rule themselves as well as protect their new nation from others. In response, two ideas of government were formed among the people. One group called themselves the Federalist who saw a need for a strong national government and the other group was called the Anti-Federalist who preferred for each state to rule and govern itself. As Brown and Shi state, a “fierce political debate that ensued, advocates of the new Constitution assumed the name Federalists.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis
    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Federalists Vs Antifederalist Analysis

    The federalists wanted a strong national government because the acts of confederation failed. Federalists called for a national bank and good relations with Great Britain, this was expressed in the jay treaty in 1794. Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the federalists and backed their beliefs fully. The only federalist president was John Adams. After the jay treaty passed the federalists won most of the major legislative battles in the 1790s.…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists
    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

    It became clear soon after the Articles of Confederation were implemented that the document had certain flaws that weakened the newly created United States. A new document, the Constitution, was drafted to replace the Articles. Many people supported the Constitution, but some disagreed with it. Both the Federalists and the anti-Federalists provided valuable insight into the creation of the Constitution. Some of the arguments presented by the anti-Federalists were that it lacked a Bill of Rights, which would guarantee citizens freedoms; that the strong central government would be unable to govern such a large territory; and that the government that was established was too close to the British system they had just overcome.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Summary
    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist And The Anti-Federalists Summary

    From 1787-1790 the American Constitution was debated by two opposing political philosophies named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalist were in favor of the newly formed Constitution while the Anti-Federalists objected the new constitution believing that the central government seized too much power by creating a single national government forcing the first Congress to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. The most significant topic of the debate the participation of the people in voting for ratification of the constitution. Pauline Maier in her article Take This or Nothing, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, illustrates reason the constitution was ratified…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Debate Between Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Debate Between Federalists Pros And Cons

    In America, people have certain freedoms that cannot be infringed upon by the government, and they are liberties that some people from other countries are not entitled to have. These unalienable rights of the American people are specifically stated in the Bill of Rights found in the U.S. Constitution. In 1789, a year after the Constitution was ratified, a draft of the Bill of Rights was proposed, and it contained ten amendments, which would be added to the Constitution. In 1789, the Bill of Rights was finally ratified and resolved the huge debate between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. One of their debates was over the necessity of the bill, which the Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, believed it unnecessary to write it on the…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalist Analysis
    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti Federalist Analysis

    One of the concerns of the Anti-Federalists is that people would prioritize their own social class. This is one of the reasons they are so concerned with elitism. The Federalists argue that this is not the case, “Is it not natural that a man who is a candidate for the favor of the people and who is dependent on the suffrages of his fellow citizen for the continuance of his public honors should take care to inform himself of their dispositions and inclinations and should be willing to allow them their proper degree of influence upon his conduct?... [There are] strong chords of sympathy between the representatives and the constituent.” (Federalist 37, 219).…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Ratifying The Constitution
    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Importance Of Ratifying The Constitution

    On one hand the federalists believe that America needs a strong governemt and on the other hand the anti-federalists think the government will have too much power given to them from the constitution. To better understand these beliefs let me explain the ways the constitution regulates the power of the government. The way that the constitution regulates the government is by checks and balances. The way that the checks and balances work is by splitting up the government into three branches with each branch being able to limit the power of the other branches so that there could not be one branch of…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist Paper
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Federalist Paper

    The Federalist Papers were written during the time period of 1787-1788 with the hopes of ratifying the constitution. The Federalist Papers consist of 85 essays composed from writers such as James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton. These papers were published as essays anonymously in New York newspapers. The Federalist Papers were originally under the name of The Federalist until the 20th century. James Madison wrote both Federalist Paper No. 10 and No. 51.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Patrick Henry And James Madison: Two Key Roles In The Development Of The Constitution
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Patrick Henry And James Madison: Two Key Roles In The Development Of The Constitution

    In America’s most important document, Patrick Henry and James Madison played two key roles in the development of the Constitution. These two men had different views on how America should be governed. Patrick Henry who was against the new Constitution and sided with the Anti-Federalists. James Madison was the architect of the Constitution and felt a powerful government was needed in order for the colonies to not fall apart. After the Revolutionary War the colonies needed some help with the low imports from Britain since they were cut off from the war and the debt was increasing.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nationalization Vs Federalism
    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nationalization Vs Federalism

    Ever since America was founded, its population has always struggled with the balance between national and local politics. A national government was favored because of its ability to maintain cohesiveness among the whole population, while local, smaller governments were favored in order to limit the powers of the national government and to prevent the tyranny the colonists faced before fleeing from Britain. While some Americans argue that states’ rights hold more importance over the power of the federal government, an “overall trend in American history shows the increase of dominance of local over national politics.” The dominance of the federal government is beneficial for American society because it is more efficient, more democratic, and…

    • 1705 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalist Pros And Cons
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti Federalist Pros And Cons

    Hearing all these things about the ratifying the constitution or creating a new constitution from scratch really has my mind working. You have the federalist, the people for ratifying the constitution and no Bill of Rights and the Anti-federalist, the people for creating a whole new constitution and having a bill of rights. I have to say that is not much to go off of right there but there is a whole lot more when you go into depth, I am for the anti-federalist. Why, you may ask?…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    James Madison's Contribution Essay
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Madison's Contribution Essay

    It is the minds of powerful and brilliant thinkers from every era of history that have led to the world we live in today. James Madison made a positive impact on the United States through his many political actions. During the Constitutional Convention, Madison created the Virginia plan. While he was the secretary of state, he acquired the Louisiana Territory. While he was the fourth president of the United States, he lead the country defiantly against the British during the War of 1812.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings