• Home Page
  • Two Advantages Of Living In A Federal Political System

Two Advantages Of Living In A Federal Political System

Decent Essays
Show More
Two advantages of living in a federal political system are:

Localized Governance - Elected representatives live in close proximity to the people they represent, which better positions them to understand the problems and offer unique solutions to the citizens of their communities.

Freedom to Form Policy - State governments have the liberty to adopt policies that may or may not be followed nationally. For example, same sex marriage were not recognized by the federal government until 2015, but before than these marriages were given legal status within certain states that approved of it.

Two disadvantages of living in a federal political system are:

Uneven distribution of wealth - Because natural resources, industry, and employment opportunities

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Glt1 Task 1
    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Glt1 Task 1

    TASK1 1. Constituion of Australia 2. It controls the government of Australia 3. Legislative,executive and judicial power 4. Legislative power writes the law 5.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Compare And Contrast Unitary Confederate
    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Unitary Confederate

    A federal system is the division between the states and the national government. Each govern the residents within their territory, are constitutionally protected and cannot abolish the other. The powers of these two in a federal system differ slightly in that the national government is accountable for circumstances such as national defense, currency, and foreign affairs while the state deals with matters consisting of education, public safety and voting. In a unitary system, authority rests in the hands of the national government. Local and regional governments do not have this power, the only way they can possess it is if the national government grants it to them, but it can be taken away at any time and for any reason.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Dual Federalism
    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Dual Federalism

    Federalism is the political system in which ultimate authority is shared between a central government and state or regional governments. The balance and boundaries between the national and state government have changed greatly. For the framers of the constitution federalism was a way to minimize conformity costs. they knew they couldn’t come up with an exact list of everything the government could and could not being that there will be time where it might has to be some add on to the list.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Dual Federalism: Government
    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dual Federalism: Government

    Dual Federalism: According to American Government textbook dual federalism is “the states and national government exercise exclusive authority in distinctly delineated spheres of jurisdiction” (82). In other words, it is a political system where government powers of state and national (federal) government was strictly divided. This is also known as “like the layers of a cake” (82).…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist Vs Hamiltonian Democracy
    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Hamiltonian Democracy

    I am persuaded that the Federalist [Hamiltonian] political approach toward governing the young United States had stronger ideas versus the Republican [Jeffersonian] position, which lacked in forward thinking, suppressed free marketing and trade, sought to reduce the national army, and yet supported virtue of the common people. The American Revolution caused high war-debt issues, requiring immediate and effective attention, which in my opinion demanded a strong centralized government. Hamilton’s group, the Federalists, were made up of mostly educated bankers, merchants, and manufactures with some wealthy plantation owners interested in securing the future of the Union by force of “big government”. They believed that government control should be in the hands of the elite and wealthy, that there should be a National Bank, and the establishment of public credit, saying it was authorized by the constitution as “necessary and proper”. Hamilton wrote, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men the great difficulty lies in this:…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities Between The Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Similarities Between The Federalists Pros And Cons

    I chose to focus my posting on “The Federalist/ Anti-Federalist Controversy.” The controversy started after the delegates drafted the new federal Constitution. They had to draft and make a new constitution because the Articles of Confederation were weak and falling apart. The Articles of Confederation was the form of government the United States was under. When the new Constitution came out, they sent it out to the states for approval.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Argument Analysis
    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texas Argument Analysis

    Recently, there has been an argument in the State of Texas about the power of the State and the local governments. This argument had raised up after Gregg Abbott warned about the “Californization” of Texas, and in follow passing laws that limited the power of local governments on issues like fracking in their cities. These arguments are similar to those that are for the powers for the State versus Federal government. Hence, there are lots of arguments for and against the local control, and on the other hand, it is hypocritical for the state government to impose its will on the policies.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The US Government System
    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The US Government System

    The U.S. government system has worked for over two hundred years. It can easily be proven that the system has worked great, and it is, for sure, a huge reason America has shaped out to be what it is. Even though the government system has worked well for decades, people are blinded by the horrifying fact that the way the government's system runs just doesn't work anymore. The government has come to be destructive. It is making the ground under the feet of the people crumble and break, yet ¨the people¨ don't even realize it.…

    • 179 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Welfare Reform Pros And Cons
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Welfare Reform Pros And Cons

    It allows local governments to be able to respond to their [citizens’ preferences]. With the local/state government having control over laws, corporate laws, insurance, family law, and morality which would have an effect on the what policies are passed for the specific moral views of the people. In dual federalism, state government play a larger role than national government, this allows the state to get better handle on the their own government rather than having to deal with problematic situations that can occur within other states that would inhibit the process of the policy they are in favor of not being…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Importance Of Local Control In Texas
    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Importance Of Local Control In Texas

    Padilla Mauricio Padilla 1912257 2017 SP GOVT-2306-73011 Local Control in Texas May 7, 2017 Control in Texas The control in Texas is mostly in the power of the state government because if a local government makes a law to ban a certain thing the state can make a law staying that, that thing cannot be banned. People wonder why the State government makes laws that are against what the local want and “the answer is money.” (White) Just from the natural resource industries the states representatives receive “3.8 million” (White) which would be an average of 25,000 per person and that is why they made a law that local cities cannot ban fracking from the cities.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalist Pros And Cons
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Anti Federalist Pros And Cons

    Hearing all these things about the ratifying the constitution or creating a new constitution from scratch really has my mind working. You have the federalist, the people for ratifying the constitution and no Bill of Rights and the Anti-federalist, the people for creating a whole new constitution and having a bill of rights. I have to say that is not much to go off of right there but there is a whole lot more when you go into depth, I am for the anti-federalist. Why, you may ask?…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Strong National Government
    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Strong National Government

    This is because a state and local government make the citizen feel closer to their elected representative to voice their opinions. Also a strong state government can design policy, according to the local political culture and economic condition that might be more applicable to the local people; therefore the local government might be able to have a better distribution of resources, since they can localize the budget and fully utilized the resources they have. A strong state government is more likely to have better accountability since it is relatively easy to identify which department is held…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Nevada Constitution Comparison
    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nevada Constitution Comparison

    Comparison and Distinction of the U.S and Nevada Constitutions Xitlali Salas 1 A Comparison and Distinction of the United States and Nevada Constitutions As the foundations and frameworks for a government, constitutions play crucial roles in shaping the way a state and nation are run. While the Constitution of the United States outlines the way the federal government is run and act as the supreme law, each state has its own constitution to lay out the way its own government will run.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Anti-Federalism
    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Anti-Federalism

    Anti-federalist correctly pointed out that the Constitution granted the federal courts an abundance of power, at the expense of the state and local courts. They wanted equal representation and supported implementing the Bill of Rights into the constitution for guaranteed protection of individual and natural rights. So when deciding to support Federalism or Anti-Federalism I choose Anti-federalism. Not only do I concur with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and its necessity but I would have also side with them on senators and presidents being directly elected by the people.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Creative Federalism
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Creative Federalism

    The Federalist papers played a crucial role in helping to quell the fears of Americans who didn’t want another King George III. In Federalist number 45, James Madison reassures Americans that the federal government was not given too much power, and that if the federal government became too strong or tyrannical, the states would be able to mitigate any effects (Madison 1788). Madison also states that the federal government is necessary for the prosperity of the people (Madison 1788). He claims that the powers of the federal government will not be dangerous to its people, for which he gives a few reasons. First of all, Madison argues that the federal government’s powers are few and specific, whereas the state powers are broad and unlimited.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings