Even though Twitter has both negative and positive aspects, it is so influential to political campaigns, like Trump’s, that the Library of Congress began archiving every public tweet since Twitter was established. Twitter, along with other social media sites, accurately indicates the public’s opinion because it allows for a bigger sample of people’s views. Although, a group’s tweets and opinions on Trump is not necessarily positive, it will still accurately represent their views. Twitter is a free social media site that allows anyone to create an account as long as they have internet access. Optimists of social media’s use believe that internet sites, like Twitter, have increased the involvement of politically inactive groups and have allowed their input to contribute to the public’s general opinion on Trump’s campaign. For example, the younger generations, people with less income or historically less politically involved groups, are more likely to participate on Twitter. This is helpful for Trump because it allows people across all demographics to be …show more content…
This has an effect on Trump’s campaign because Twitter makes it appear that Trump has a higher percentage of support than he actually does in real life. Another problem with using Twitter for determining voter preference is that Twitter is more anonymous than a face-to-face conversation which results in a willingness for users to share their negative views. On Twitter, users can isolate themselves based on their political views by controlling which candidates they want to follow. This is detrimental to tolerating other views and supports the idea of partisan polarization. Partisan polarization is the idea that voters only seek out information that agrees with their personal beliefs and avoid information that does not support these ideas. Lastly, Twitter is a poor indicator of voter preference because not all users can or will not vote in the presidential