• Home Page
  • Twelve Angry Men: What Is The Author's Purpose?

Twelve Angry Men: What Is The Author's Purpose?

Improved Essays
Show More
What’s The Author's Purpose?
A jury of a dozen men all come together to come to a conclusion of guilty or not guilty, but someone is always not on the same page as the others what do you do? Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose is an example of what happens in a jury. I think Rose’s purpose of writing this is to entertain us, the readers and I also believe he was once in the jury himself and he wanted to show his experience.

In Rose 1 they voted eleven to one NO.8 voted not guilty and the others voted guilty. Instead of jumping to conclusions like the others he actually wants to go over the facts and talk it out to come to a reasonable conclusion. NO.8 did not have a good reason to say not guilty besides the fact that he was only nineteen years of age, I don’t agree with that being a reason to be not guilty but NO.8 wanted to go over all the facts so he knows for sure not to punish someone for something he didn’t do or let a killer out on the streets. If it was me, I would have said not guilty as well not only because I do believe he’s guilty, but because no one wanted to be there so they just tried to get everything done. …show more content…
As for NO.8 he still stuck to not guilty, but he requested “I want to call for a vote. I want eleven men to vote by secret ballot. I’ll abstain. If there are still eleven votes for guilty, I won’t stand alone. We’ll take in a guilty verdict right now.” This was really dumb of him because he shouldn’t allow them to change his mind. Because even if they would have voted eleven to one again of the boy wasn’t guilty it would have looked bad on him for not supporting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose: Innocent Until Proven Guilty
    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose: Innocent Until Proven Guilty

    Innocent Until Proven Guilty “A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are shaky include the position the knife was in, the man hearing the boy threaten his father, and the woman who is in question because of her glasses. Based on these, the boy is not guilty. One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the stab wound.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Pathos In Juror 8
    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pathos In Juror 8

    As the play progresses, readers learn of Juror 11’s origin because he consistently comments on the principles of America and why he came to the Land of the Free. Futhermore, Juror 11’s interaction with Juror 5 on page 246 insinuates Juror 11 has faced mistreatment prior to his arrival to America. Audience members sympathize with Juror 11 due to his submissive personality, which is revealed through Rose’s syntactical expertise. With lines shorter than the other jurors, Juror 11 speaks when it is necessary: “I think it was eight o’clock. Not seven” (227), “Perhaps this is not the point” (231), “I would think about ten seconds, perhaps” (235), and “Perhaps if we could see it...…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection
    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    So they did a vote, but this vote was different it was a private vote. So the twelve men all casted in their votes. The foramen received the votes and open each on eagerly to see what the vote was. There was one more not-guilty vote. juror three after find this out gives juror five criticism, because he thinks that juror five’s vote was the not-guilty, and that he voted not guilty just because juror five grew up in the slums and felt bad for the boy.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Prejudice And Bias In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Prejudice And Bias In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Dilemmas In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men
    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical Dilemmas In Sidney Lumet's 12 Angry Men

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men
    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    Not ready to accept change or reality at the first go. He was last one to accept not guilty. Jury 8: He has courage to go against the 11 jury members to stand in what he believe. He was compassionate and curious standing against all the odds and engaging the group courageously. He created a constructive dissonance that lead to extracting some finer details.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Ethos, Logos And Actions In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethos, Logos And Actions In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    Juror #2 seems really interested in this argument and even volunteers to help with the timing of the experiment. In the beginning of Act 2, the jury decides to vote once more. At the time, Juror #2’s vote was “not guilty.” Even though Juror #2 changes his vote to “not guilty,”…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men
    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis: 12 Angry Men

    He pleaded not guilty because he wanted to discuss the case…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Persuasive Letter
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    12 Angry Men Persuasive Letter

    After all the jurors voted “not guilty”. Even though it took juror #3 to be the last to declare “not…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Biases In 12 Angry Men
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Biases In 12 Angry Men

    This shows how someone who doesn’t want to be there wouldn’t take the case seriously, not putting full thought into the decision. If a jury were to be made, they should all want to be there and take the case…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Crucible And 12 Angry Men Analysis
    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Crucible And 12 Angry Men Analysis

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men
    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Group Problem Solving Process In 12 Angry Men

    The results are now 10 – 2 because juror #9 wants to hear what juror #8 has to say. After this, the jury goes thru an extended process were juror #8 presents a number of ideas and thoughts to take the evidence out, saying that it is not possible that the old man could have heard the boy’s screaming because the loudness of the train, or the he could not have seen the boy running out at the stairs because he can barely walks. Another vote is call out, and now the numbers are 6 –…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men
    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Analysis Of Juror # 8 In 12 Angry Men

    He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion). After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    12 Angry Men Peer Pressure Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    12 Angry Men Peer Pressure Analysis

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Fonda) As The Leader In The Movie Juuror 8
    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Henry Fonda) As The Leader In The Movie Juuror 8

    He was consistently insecure during the case as he had been projecting his own personal feelings about his own son onto the defendant. He ultimately breaks down at the end of the movie and grudgingly changes his vote to not…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings