Upon closer analysis, several pieces of the communication between Viola and Orsino remain unclear. The Duke continues to refer to Viola as “boy” (5.1.265) even after she reveals herself as a woman. Although his tone towards her is loving and it is now socially acceptable for him to reveal his feelings, Orsino does not aid in the resolving of gender identity crisis present. Instead, the Duke is in love with Viola’s personality, but Cesario’s appearance. This leaves the sexuality of Orsino unresolved and adds to the assertion that sexuality, like gender, is not necessarily black and white. Observed in the context of the subtleness of gendered love and sexual attraction presented in this play, the marriages of the characters only reiterate the idea that gender and sexual identities are fluid characteristics that the self creates based on societal norms and individual
Upon closer analysis, several pieces of the communication between Viola and Orsino remain unclear. The Duke continues to refer to Viola as “boy” (5.1.265) even after she reveals herself as a woman. Although his tone towards her is loving and it is now socially acceptable for him to reveal his feelings, Orsino does not aid in the resolving of gender identity crisis present. Instead, the Duke is in love with Viola’s personality, but Cesario’s appearance. This leaves the sexuality of Orsino unresolved and adds to the assertion that sexuality, like gender, is not necessarily black and white. Observed in the context of the subtleness of gendered love and sexual attraction presented in this play, the marriages of the characters only reiterate the idea that gender and sexual identities are fluid characteristics that the self creates based on societal norms and individual