Twain's Argumentative Analysis

Mr. Twain clearly exhorted that our human hunters organized buffalo hunts for entertainment of an English earl and to also provide fresh meat for his earl. They killed seventy-two of these animals and ate part of one of them and left 71 to rot. The retile anaconda was given the a similar opportunity and to determine difference, Mr. Twain put seven young calves in its cage and the reptile excitedly ate one upon entry and at this point it laid back with satisfaction. This specific experiment was tried with multiple anacondas only to produce the same result; greed did not ever play a part in in its decision. When the reptile reached a point where enough was enough; unlike the earl ,who found sport in the over kill as well as general waste he stopped and was satisfied to a point of backing away. …show more content…
This is not how the human species tends to operate. When subjected to the same environmental choices and decisions. The general norm in the human race is to completely disregard their mate or commitments any as well as all other involved. Most, only seek out personal satisfaction, not truly troubled to any extent to worry about the possible final outcome. This alone strongly supports Mr. Twain’s ideas of humans being the lowest animal. Human instinctively react on the main thing that they use as crutch, an emotional guide line. This tends to make them seem to never operate in a season of sufficiency, always acting in lust and acting on craving as well as