Tsar Nicholas II

Great Essays
At the end of the nineteenth century, Tsar Nicholas II of Russia reluctantly took command of an empire overflowing with revolutionaries seeking change in response to hardships. His shy personality, coupled with his lack of political education, made him unfit to handle the war-torn chaos that would soon darken Russian skies. Nicholas’ series of unfortunate, unprepared and uninformed decisions began with his marriage and would ultimately lead to the demise of his imperial family’s three-hundred-year dynastic tradition. The turn of the century illuminated Russia as the last remaining European autocracy. It was labeled “backwards” by other European powers. Only recently in the 1860s had the serfs been freed from legal bondage by Alexander II, …show more content…
Her upbringing did not allow her to mix well with the high strung Russian society, which led to her dislike by the Russian court and citizens alike. Her strong personality overpowered Nicholas’ and she had great influence over him and his political decisions, which was unfortunate because she knew even less about Russian politics than did Nicholas. She once wrote to a British ambassador that “The Emperor, unfortunately, is weak; but I am not, and I intend to be firm.” Alexandra bore Nicholas four daughters and a son, who was stricken with the “bleeding disease” Hemophilia and whose illness was kept secret from anyone outside the royal family. Hopeless at the lack of treatments for the young tsarevich, Grigori Rasputin, a mysterious peasant from the Russian countryside said to have magical healing powers, was invited into the royal palace to try to heal Alexei. Despite his promiscuous reputation and the horrified reactions of the Russian royal circle, he became an essential party of the royal family when he was able to “heal” the tsarevich a few times. Nicholas was not able to say no to his wife. Although he knew that Rasputin was nothing more than a power-hungry fraud, Nicholas allowed him to remain. When Nicholas was preoccupied during the war, Alexandra began to take over some of the responsibilities at the capitol, often consulting Rasputin about hugely …show more content…
In January 1905, an event called “Bloody Sunday” occurred, during which a peaceful protest was crushed by Russian guards and about a thousand people were killed. The citizens blamed the tsar and the strikes and violent demonstrations continued for several months. In October, in response to the strikes, Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto, which stated he would establish a constitution and parliament, called the Duma. However, Nicholas detested the Duma and did everything in his power to limit their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter The Great Decrees

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Peter the Great wanted “to transform his country through a process of state imposed Westernization.” He was convinced that Russia could overcome its backwardness only by adopting “the institutions, customs and attitudes of the technologically superior, wealthier and more powerful states of Western Europe.” Many were opposed to his decrees and edicts because they would “mean discarding much of Russia’s distinctive past.” Those “devoted to Russia’s unique Slavic and Orthodox Christian traditions” …” argued that abandonment of Russia’s past was too high a price to pay for Europeanization.”…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Katherine Moir Ms. McDugall AP World History 3 June 2016 Was Peter Truly Great? Peter the Great of late seventeenth and early eighteenth century Russia was a highly controversial leader. On the one hand, he achieved his ultimate goal of making Russia a great European power, however on the other hand he took a path of violence and oppression to get there (“Czap”).…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavellian Ruler, Ivan the Terrible Ivan Vasilyevich, Ivan IV, was a Machiavellian ruler called to the throne at the age of three after his father’s death; however, his mother, Yelena Glinskaya, ruled as a surrogate until her death in 1538. Later on, Ivan IV was crowned as Russia’s ruler on January 16, 1547 (Andryev). Later, during the constructive period of Ivan’s reign, he issued many reforms involving self-government, taxes, and religion (“Ivan the Terrible”). After this seemingly calm time, Ivan IV’s iconic rule truly began with the death of his wife, Anastasia (Shaposhnik 75). Ivan IV, later known as Ivan the Terrible, exhibited the qualities of a Machiavellian ruler, because he had extensive military knowledge, because he weakened a stronger force, the nobility, to gain power himself, and because was more feared by his subjects feared than loved.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although he was smart, he did have strong outbreaks of uncontrollable rage. Ivan and his eldest son got into a disagreement one day and he struck him dead with a pointed- metal staff. There is a ton of favorable evidence showing that he had abnormal psychology throughout his lifetime. Ivan was married to Anastasia and he loved her greatly; her death in 1560 filled him with great sorrow. He was married at least five more times after her, but he didn’t really feel the same love for them as he did for Anastasia.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people think of brutality and ruthlessness when discussing Ivan the Terrible. Although he was cruel and ruthless during his reign, Ivan IV, as he was formally known, did implement some lasting reforms for his country. There were many events, some tragic, in his life that greatly affected him and would ultimately have profound consequences during his reign. Ivan the Terrible was the Grand Prince of Moscow from 1533-1547 and called himself “Tsar of All of the Russians” until his death in 1584. He inherited the title of Grand Prince of Moscow at an early age which greatly affected how he ruled.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter I (the Great) is a Russian Tsar and first Russian Emperor, who reigned from 1682 to 1725. At this time, the country was in decline pretty much in all social, political, economic and cultural spheres, and Russians themselves were regarded by Europeans as illiterate barbarians (Hughes 12). There also was a troublous time for the throne, causing vulnerability among the masses (Hughes 3). Coming to power, Peter brought the development and social stability, which people longed for a couple of decades. However, his methods sometimes were radical, which in combination with the fast pace of the changes that he was implementing caused massive discontent among the country’s elite as well as rigorous patriots, arguing that he wanted to make Russians…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miss Pinson English 4 9/19/14 Ivan the Terrible by- Zachary Chadwick Ivan the terrible was one of the most controversial rulers in Russia’s history. There is almost no writings about him that have survived over the years, therefore historians have been forced to go on rumors, diaries, etc. This biography will use this information in order to try and piece together his life from the golden age to the age of terror that he brought on in his later years. Early life-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Dirty Dodge

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Ever since I was a little girl I have had a strange obsession with the last Tsar of Russia, Nicholas II Romanov and his family. I was introduced to this story from the FOX animated movie, Anastasia. This was my all time favorite movie as a young child. I would sing and dance along with the movie as well as daydream that I was actually the lost princess Anastasia. As I got older, I became more curious about the storyline so I did some research.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told Nicholas that the country was on the verge of revolution so potentially devastating. Nicholas had two choices, crush the rebellion or give the people civil rights, freedom of speech, and press, Nicholas recoiled at the idea of these democratic reforms. "The heart of the tsar is in the hand of God" Nicholas told his ministers any change would weaken the sacred, mortal power bestowed upon him by the Almighty. "I act in this spirit only because I am certain that it is necessary for Russia". Due to this Nicholas he thought it wasn't wretched that living conditions that had lead to the country's problems, it was the people that had turned against the autocracy and their holy tsar.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas was finally forced to sign a manifesto assuring a representative government and basic civil liberties. The rebellions came to a halt (History.com). Then Russia was attacked by Germany and began to take part in the first World War. Russia entered the war with the largest army in the world but in 1916 Tsar Nicholas…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Essay

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Firstly, his mental state was completely disturbed. When Ivan was younger, his parents died, so he…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Romanov Massacre

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On July 16, 1918, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and his five children, along with his loyal servants, descended downstairs and gathered together for a family photo shoot. However, the family photoshoot turned out to be a deceptive trick created by a communist leader, Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik troops to lure the royal Russian family, the Romanovs, out of hiding and to end Russia’s monarchical rule. Once the Romanovs and their servants made themselves known “...suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire” (“Romanov Family Executed”). Not only did they open fire on the family members but the troops also continued stabbing those who were barely remained…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How far was Rasputin responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime? The Tsarist regime collapsed in March 1917 when Nicholas II abdicated. By the time of the abdication the Tsarist regime had already been damaged by a number of factors that could be held responsible for the overall downfall of Tsar Nicholas II. One of these factors is the influence that Rasputin, a monk who convinced the Tsarina that he could cure her son of his haemophilia.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Nicholas didn’t follow through with the October Manifesto which promised to give the parliament more power, it gave the public more reason to distrust him. Nicholas belief in upholding the autocracy, can be seen as a factor which led to the downfall of the Romanov…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays