Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

Improved Essays
The snow falls heavily on January 30, 1905 and the light powder begins to cover the thousands of bodies that lay strewn, lifeless in the streets. Among the figures of men and women you can see, "children's corpses lay in the snow" (The Last Tsar of Russia). Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia. He was a family man with no desire to rule and did so poorly. He would have driven Russia into the ground had not been forced to advocate. Tsar Nicholas led Russia into many defeats and his people faced extreme poverty and poor working conditions. During Tsar Nicholas's rule more than half the population was in poverty and war was both unavoidable and unwinnable. Although Tsar Nicholas was not ready to rule it does not mean that the Tsar family was always so …show more content…
He once said to a friend: "What is going to happen to me... To all of Russia? I am not prepared to be Tsar" (Nicholas ii). As Nicholas's reign began so did poverty and poor working conditions. Apon seeing this, Father George Gapon organized a peaceful protest to go to Tsar Nicholas with a petition asking him to better working conditions(Biography.com website editor). He gave speeches in favor of the petition and at one in particular he said: " Supposing the Tsar will not receive us and read our petition?' And the crowd shouted back, ' then we will have no Tsar!" (Biography.com). The protest took place on January 5, 1905 but the Tsar would not receive them and an order was given to open fire on the marchers, killing over one thousand men, women, and children. Thousands of tiny uprisings sprang up and worker all throughout Russia went on strike. Nicholas was finally forced to sign a manifesto assuring a representative government and basic civil liberties. The rebellions came to a halt (History.com). Then Russia was attacked by Germany and began to take part in the first World War. Russia entered the war with the largest army in the world but in 1916 Tsar Nicholas

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Serfdom worked so well for the Tsar because Russia was so backwards it kept the serfs “simple and loyal.” (Pipes 162) This is why reforms and advancements, like railroads and improved…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Ivan IV Vasilyevich, a.k.a Ivan The Terrible, was officially the grand prince of Moscow until January 16th 1547 when he was crowned “Tsar of all the Russia's”. Ivan was born to Vasili the 3rd and his second wife Elena Gimskaya. He then later married Anastasia Romanovna and ruled during the Romanov dynasty. When Ivan was three years old his father died leaving him to be made grand prince of Moscow.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He told Nicholas that the country was on the verge of revolution so potentially devastating. Nicholas had two choices, crush the rebellion or give the people civil rights, freedom of speech, and press, Nicholas recoiled at the idea of these democratic reforms. "The heart of the tsar is in the hand of God" Nicholas told his ministers any change would weaken the sacred, mortal power bestowed upon him by the Almighty. "I act in this spirit only because I am certain that it is necessary for Russia". Due to this Nicholas he thought it wasn't wretched that living conditions that had lead to the country's problems, it was the people that had turned against the autocracy and their holy tsar.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan the Terrible Leader Although Ivan IV tried to expand Russia in all of its glory, he led Russia into a weakened state regarding its economy, military, and a general political disruption. Throughout Ivan’s tsarship the economy of Russia began to weaken almost to the point of collapse. Ivan IV never trusted boyars, which are the Russian people of wealth and power, for almost his entire life. Becoming tsar at the age of three meant he was too young to lead and needed people to rule for him at the time.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nicholas II Failure

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Carol, Great post, Nicholas II reign was weak and riddled with bad decisions. The Russian people did not have faith in his leadership when he leads the Russian army to battle during WWII. The people had become angry with the Nicholas II’s negligence and indifference to their suffering Their wages had plummeted, inflation had risen, public services had all but ceased, and millions were being killed in a war they didn’t want. Upon his arrival from this failure in WWI riots broke out and Nicholas ordered the crowed subdued and where fired upon and many were killed. If Nicholas II had been more in touch with his people do you think communism would have been such a powerful force in the Soviet Union?…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nicholas fell under the influence of a man called the mad monk, Grigory Rasputin, which caused Nicholas to make many bad choices. The demands for reform went unmet and more radical socialist and workers decided to take a different way. On January 22, 1905, a group of workers lead by a crazy priest mname George Gapon marched into the Winter Palace to make demands. Military forces opened fire on the demonstrators,…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision of fighting in the Russo - Japanese War, the 1905 Revolution, Bloody Sunday, the October Manifesto and Fundamental laws and Russia’s involvement in World War One contributed the situation. The Russia that Nicholas II inherited, in 1894 from his father Alexander III, was quickly changing, moving towards the industrialization era, with an ever growing…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tsars had no interest in ruling but still aimed to uphold the autocratic ruling of his father Alexandra III. The tsar’s education made him believed, it is right to have all control and power over Russia as “god” appointed him as tsar. He had absolute power meaning he can make laws, overrule laws, appoint minsters, and advise at will without being questioned. The tsar had many minsters that advised him about the affairs and policies of Russia yet he only took the advice that was appealing to him and never altered his policies. Many of his minsters described the tsar as charming and but he had a lack of knowledge and will power that disqualified him as being an effective tsar.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli suggests that it would be better to be feared than loved however the Tsar failed to be either of the two, despite the fact that at the start of the film he was loved and respected by his people. 4. The lack of industrialization in Russia plays a vital role in the outcome of the war and the actions of the Tsar and the people in general. The traditionalist views of Nicolas, to seek power through war and conquest and his refusal to industrialize and modernize his country combined with the war against the much more technologically advanced German army and state are some of the main reasons for his…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the year 1917, the war torn Russian Empire was falling to pieces, which led to the people leading a revolution that ended in the assassination of a terrible tyrant in 1918. Occurring nearly one hundred years ago, the Russian Czar Nicholas II, was killed by revolutionists after being held captive with his family for four months. He was dethroned by his people for ineffective military leadership, persecution of religious and political groups, and neglect to Russia’s people. The assassination of Czar Nicholas the II of Russia was just because he was a tyrannical ruler who often chose the worse possible scenarios for both Russia and her people; however, others may say that the killing of his entire family along with him was unjust.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Equality

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This event pretty much settles the differences between Nicholas’ loyalist and the Nicholas betrayers. Vladimir Lenin later dies of natural causes. The Bolsheviks succeed in overthrowing Tsar Nicholas II power and helping to have equal power. I understand that The bolsheviks were for the people and helped to make the land better after Bloody Sunday.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Russian Revolution of 1917 fascinated the entire world. For many years, Czar Nicholas II had a growing amount of dissatisfaction among his subjects. Russia was blighted with several different issues that developed out of the control of Nicholas II and by the time he attempted to create any reform, the damage was too substantial to be affected. One of the largest problems was the droughts that plagued the people. These droughts were often regular due to the climate, however, were particularly devastating in the previous years.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction Innumerable historians have tried over the past century to pinpoint the exact moment and reason that led to the fall of Tsar Nicholas II, who was the Emperor of the Russian Empire. However, the downfall of Tsardom cannot be perceived as an event or even a long process, but rather as a consequence of the Russian Revolution of 1917 as well as a sequence of unmanageable and highly antagonistic acts that involved contrasting parties, which occurring simultaneously consequently led to Russia’s collapse. The very trigger for the fall of Tsardom does not only stem from the mismanagement of the World War I effort, but also from a revolt of the most conservative traditionalists in Russian society, who were appalled by the Crown’s imprudent…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent was military defeat a cause for the Russian revolution? The First World War was truly massive war. It had rather complex origins, it was vast in terms of scale, its human and material costs were enormous, and its results were profound. The First World War resulted in the end of four empires; the German, the Russian, the Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman empires all ceased to exist by the end of the First World, either as a result of the economic demands of war - like Russia, which had a revolution half way through the war - or as a result of losing.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the opinion of George Buchanan, British ambassador to St Petersburg from 1910, “The emperor Nicholas was one of the most pathetic figures in history, he was so unfitted for the role and never really governed Russia.” The industrial revolution throughout russia had just been started at the time of the First World War, this is partly to blame for the fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Due to late industrialisation, the economy of russia was very weak, leading to there being no way for russia to provide for its people, soldiers and even war supplies. The russian army was even left with ridiculous supplies, many soldiers fighting barefoot and without weapons.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays