The Social Structure Of Tsar Nicholas II In The 1900's

Decent Essays
RUSSIA IN THE 1900’S
From 1896 Tsar Nicholas II has ruled the Russian empire taking over from his late father Alexander 3rd. With social classes still as prominent as ever despite the freeing of peasants in 1861 by Tsar Alexander II (Tsar Nicholas grandfather), the Great Russian empire has a social structure like a pyramid. The Tsar and his government placed at the top and peasants at the bottom.

PEASENTS:
Life as a peasant as we all know is hard. It requires hours on end of work and hardship just to try and provide something for your family. But when 80% of citizens in your country are poor it makes it that that little bit harder. Until 1861 when Tsar Alexander II freed peasants; they had been slaves to their landlords, having no rights,
…show more content…
A Tsar is a Russian form of King or Emperor that rules of the country as a whole. Emperor Tsar Nicholas II is the head of Russia 's government and Nobility. Given he is the emperor he lives a rich and luxurious life; owning 15,000 servants and 8 palaces. Nicholas II is known as an autocrat ruler, meaning he doesn’t have to share his power. He can do what he likes without consulting anyone as there is no parliament to limit his power and can sack any minister or adviser who disagrees with him. With a country of nearly 125 million people it is impossible for 1 person to govern and exercise his authority across the whole country. To aid the Tsars in their government they employed 3 major associations: The Church, The Bureaucracy and The Police.
Enforcing the tsarist autocracy requires both ideological and practical measures. Claiming to rule by the ‘divine right’, the tsar acquires his power and authority from God rather than the consent of others. Russians are told to obey the tsar as he is ‘appointed by God’. Not only did the Russian Orthodox Church support the tsarist rule but was supported by it as well. The Tsar who was a religious man consulted with the church’s archbishops regularly. In return the church encouraged Russian citizens to accept and embrace autocracy and taught its followers that it was gods wish to love and obey the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Otherwise Russians were left alone, free to practise their religions, and do whatever they wish, within reason. The Mongol officials even punished those who desecrated the Orthodox church, and they followed a different faith. Military arrangement, and administrative practises were altered during the period they were part of the Mongolian Empire. “The Russian people, as one Russian historian pointed out, "were trained by the Mongols to take orders, to pay taxes, and to supply soldiers without delay." They carried over these habits into later centuries, making them excellent subjects for future czars,” (Esler).…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nichlas the second was the last Tsar of Russia. He was executed and abdicated because of the way he handled Bloody Sunday and and Russia’s place in World War 1. Nicholas was born on May 6, 1918 in Pushkin, Russia. He received the throne when his dad Alexander the third died in 1894. His father created an elected legislature.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Many people think of brutality and ruthlessness when discussing Ivan the Terrible. Although he was cruel and ruthless during his reign, Ivan IV, as he was formally known, did implement some lasting reforms for his country. There were many events, some tragic, in his life that greatly affected him and would ultimately have profound consequences during his reign. Ivan the Terrible was the Grand Prince of Moscow from 1533-1547 and called himself “Tsar of All of the Russians” until his death in 1584. He inherited the title of Grand Prince of Moscow at an early age which greatly affected how he ruled.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russia had been lagging behind the rest of Europe when it came to industry and modernity, but they were toward the beginning of the revolutionary movement. When World War I came about, Russians believed the war would be a short one and that they would not need to make use of all of their resources, such as soldiers and supplies. Tsar Nicholas put his faith into a Russian victory for the sake of national unity (EUROPE 165). Against Nicholas’s original beliefs, the war raged on, and peasants in Russia experienced even more unrest. Intellectuals became revolutionaries, and a regime was desired that “would let Russia catch up to the west” (SOURCES 84).…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reformation period of Tsar Alexander II’s reign stapled him in Russian history as the “Tsar-Liberator”. The Emancipation of Serfs, and the Zemstvo reform had a major positive impact on Russia in both economic and political ways. Through the scope of historical perspective, Alexander II is deserving of the title “Tsar-Liberator” for making great advancements in Russia even when it opposed prior Russian culture and norms. The Emancipation of Serfs was the boldest of all of Alexander II’s reforms. To emancipate serfs meant also to work against age long Russian tradition of Serfdom.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The snow falls heavily on January 30, 1905 and the light powder begins to cover the thousands of bodies that lay strewn, lifeless in the streets. Among the figures of men and women you can see, "children's corpses lay in the snow" (The Last Tsar of Russia). Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia. He was a family man with no desire to rule and did so poorly. He would have driven Russia into the ground had not been forced to advocate.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nicholas Romanov Failure

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Nicholas inherited the role as supreme autocrat of Russia, which contained one sixth of the world’s land mass and over a hundred and thirty million people (Nilsen). When Nicholas II’s reign started, millions of his subjects were living in poverty and foreign relations were precarious. Regardless of his own abilities, the task of being tsar was a daunting one and there were many issues facing Nicholas. Unfortunately, Nicholas II only added to the problems…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Romanov Dynasty Essay

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Empire under the rule of the Romanov Dynasty for almost 300 years grew and cemented itself as a major global power, equalling its Western European counterparts. Through massive technological change, the kindling of international relations, and social and economic crises alike, imperial Russia was piloted by tsars and tsarinas to rise as a modern empire. From its ambiguous beginnings in 1613, the Romanov dynasty was born from the boyar nobles of feudal Russia, bearing historically significant figures like Ivan the Great, Ivan the Terrible, Peter the Great, and Catherine the Great; these characters formed a foundation that Russia would stand on for centuries to come. With economic, social, and political evolution, Russia saw the continuity…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Russian Empire believed they would measure up to the Western Europe states if they improved their political reforms. Thanks to Catherine II’s reforms, her achievements played a key role in the development of Russia to be seen as a modern state not only in a politics but also in a cultural sense. “In foreign affairs, Catherine was determined to continue and even exceed Peter the Great’s…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Russian Revolution of 1917, there was a class of people known as the bourgeoisie. “The English word 'bourgeoisie' is derived from the French word 'bourgeoisie' meaning "... the trading middle class"(MARXISM).” The Russian bourgeoisie in 1917 were basically a class of capitalist, landowning, and wealthy people. They wanted things to change just like everyone else but they expected things to still stay wonderful for them.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peasants made up 80% of the Russian population at the time and although they manly were loyal followers of the Tsar, many supported the Social Revolutionaries as there was a large discontent over land as most of the land was owned by the aristocracy (who made up only 1.5% of the population) and the church. This strained relationship between the Tsar and his people was shown when in 1903 rules on censorship and repressive measures were relaxed, which lead to ‘an explosion of anti-government pamphlets, books and newspapers’ 8 this shows that many people were unhappy with the way the Tsar ruled. An example of the people protesting against the way the Tsar ruled was on Sunday, 22 January 1905, also known as Bloody Sunday. On this day 200,000 protesters who were mainly workers, led by the priest Father Gapon marched to the Winter Palace in St. Petersburg with a petition for the Tsar, all carrying pictures of the Tsar to show respect.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Russian Social Setup

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Russia’s new openness to its society attracted many different religious activists around the world. In Russia you can find Swiss Protestants, Roman Catholic missionaries, German Lutherans, many catholic orders, Catholics, Christians, the unification church and the church of scientology. Nearly half the Russian population is Russian orthodoxy, 6.5% is Islam, and the rest is a mix of the listed religions above. The word Orthodox means “right belief” or “right phrase” and the Orthodox church is also known as the “eastern European Orthodox…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nicholas was charming and intelligent a man who had the welfare of russia at heart. But Nicholas lacked the necessary characteristics for autocratic rule. He was anxious, distrustful of ministers such as Witte and stolypin, who urged reform. his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    distinguishing itself two distinct classes, namely: The Nobleza, with the King at the helm, was with the aristocracy, the privileged class in Russia. They ran the government, were the largest owners, they enjoyed all their rights and, also, of all privileges. Others showed themselves and insensitive to the needs and sufferings of the people. The people, was made up of professionals, employees, workers and peasants, who cried because they recognize their freedoms and rights, because disappear exploitation, excessive hours of work and low wages; They asked also, a better distribution of land and the prevalence of justice regardless of class. They were the backbone of the Russian Revolution, because thanks to the triumph of this, they could transform a feudal state into a prosperous nation "USSR", eager to universal dominion.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays