Tsar Nicholas II Mistakes Essay

Good Essays
Since the early 1600’s Russia had been ruled by the Romanov family. The final Tsars were increasingly ineffective and when Tsar Nicholas II came into power he did not fix the mistakes of the past Tsars and due to his bad leadership he is solely to blame for bringing his country into ruin which in turn led to his downfall, however, the people of Russia were eager for change because of the mistakes of the past Tsars and Nicholas II could not govern the entire country and keep them from wanting a revolution.

During the course of Nicholas II reign he made various mistakes that contributed to his downfall. Nicholas II’s father, Alexander II, brought a police of Russification which stated that the non-native people of Russia must give up their
…show more content…
In 1914 World War 1 broke out and Nicholas II decided to take control of the army. The government was left to be controlled by the Tsarina and Rasputin who had their own interests in mind. Due to most supplies being dedicated towards the war effort there was a shortage in food and the people starved and grew angry with the Tsar. The Duma would not help the people’s concern and as such they began to support the revolutionary parties such as the Mensheviks, Bolsheviks and Social Revolutionaries. As the war effort continued most of the people in Russia were calling for peace but the Tsar would not leave the war so they grew ready to revolt against the crown. In February 1917 the people of Russia reached their breaking point. Rasputin was killed by a group of nobles and the Female textile workers of Russia went on a hunger strike and were joined by all of the workers in Petrograd. The Cossacks and army were sent to control the crowds and stop them but the soldiers were also tired of the war and joined the strikes instead. The revolutionary parties led by the Mensheviks took control of all municipal and government buildings. The Duma forced the Tsar to abdicate from the throne. Tsar Nicholas ignored the peoples call for reform and governed the country as he wished which led to his forced abdication of the …show more content…
Since Tsar Alexander III took away all reforms and brutally eliminated all opposition the people of Russia were not happy with the Tsarist regime and wanted to revolt. The revolutionary parties all had their own agendas as to why each of them wanted to rule Russia. The parties believed that their own way was the best way for Russia to be ruled but they all agreed that it was time for the monarch to be ended. Tsar Nicholas II was one man and could not be expected to control the whole of Russia alone. He entrusted the Tsarina and Rasputin to help him rule and they failed to do so in a way that would improve Russia and the people’s opinion of the Tsarist regime. Russia was a large country and it was hard to hear all the people’s voices and act on what they wanted. The incident of Bloody Sunday cannot be blamed on a Tsar that was not at the palace and who therefore could not stop the Cossacks. The incident of Bloody Sunday is to be blamed on the general who gave the order to attack the innocents. As WW1 broke out and the Tsar took control to fight against the Germans who threatened to kill millions of innocents and control all of Europe the revolutionary parties were able to use the food shortages and complaints to blame the Tsar as a scapegoat to further their own agenda’s. When the time was ripe the people of Russia revolted

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    There is a major and distinct difference between being an overseer and a leader. Both are based on supremacy, but an overseer demand obsequious behavior while a leader earn trust through understanding others. During Tsar Nicholas II reign; he was known for being the last Romanov leaders. Tsar’s government held totally power, along with the inability to rule over Russia. Tsar was dethroned and later executed with his family for his poor judgement and Russia being in chaos.…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is a valid argument because indeed the World War I disasters had an effect on how people felt about their society and how they believed it should run. They believe that if the disasters if World War I was avoided, then Russians would not have revolted against their government. But to disagree, the current situation in Russia at the time was already intolerable and was eventually going to get worse with the help of the Tsar. Tsar Nicholas II had no idea on how to run a military, not to mention a country. As is states “Unfortunately, the Tsar knew little about the command and organization of large military forces, and the series of defeats and humiliations continued” (The Cause if the Russian Revolution).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bloody Sunday set off a chain of events including mutinies, control of the Trans-Siberian Railway, establishments of Unions and general strikes widespread around Russia which halted the economy; Nicholas II had no choice but to respond to the demand of the people, creating the October Manifesto. The October Manifesto established the Duma which gave the Russian people the sense that Tsar Nicholas II had lost some of his power and they now had a voice that the Tsar would listen to, but this was not the case. Nicholas II came up with a loop-hole- The Fundamental Laws- which reasserted his autocratic power. This allowed him to veto decisions made by the Duma and control…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Absolute disregard for their situation and needs led to the collapse of a country… and allowed communism to raise its head. If the Tsar had been a strong leader, or if the Russian people had just had a say in how their country was being run, the whole revolution would have been avoided. This would have altered the history of many countries that were affected by communism, and in turn the world, which was the result of the Russian…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Red Scare Essay

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Red Scare was a hysteria caused by the fear that communists, the “Reds”, will rise and take control over the United States of America in the 1900s. The first Red Scare began after World War I, when the communists in Russia, the Bolshevik, got rid of the royal family and took control over their nation. The fear of communism increased when several strikes led by industrial workers and policemen happened in 1919. Communists were always blamed, especially when a bomb was dropped to purposely kill A. Mitchell Palmer, who was the Attorney General of America. Fearing that the communists will impose their ideas and overthrow their government, one of the top goals of most Americans was to get rid of all communists and their supporters that lived…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People were demanding social and political reforms but Nicholas was unable to comply because the Aristocracy and the Military elites would not allow these changes. Finally, when the Duma abandoned the Tsar and forced him to abdicate, the entire Tsarist regime was replaced with a strict, socialist system. The people were willing to sacrifice individual liberties in order to achieve social and economic equality. Bibliography Last modified 2002. Accessed November 26, 2014. http://www.johndclare.net.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Russian and Iranian Revolutions have very similar causes: an ignorant leader. In Russia, the Tsar was taking Russia into a dead end. His first mistake was to take personal control over the Russian army, which lead to the people blaming the Szar for every defeat that occurred in World War 1 (Class Discussion). Following WW1, the loss of precious resources and the sacrifice of countless lives lead to Russia to be in a state of extreme famine and poverty (Jerry and Ziegler, 1). The crumbling army, food shortages, numerous uprisings, and taking away people’s right of speech and press in the proletariat class lead to a very successful February Revolution in 1917(Jerry and Ziegler, 1).…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence stimulated a crisis of the already inefficient system, and he worsened things as he showed favor to right-wing politicians in attempts to secure support for his regime. Climactically, his attempts only ended in the…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nicholas lacked the necessary personal characteristics for autocratic rule. He was changeable and anxious, his abilities were undermines by his diffidence and irresolution. There was already talk of removing Nicholas II at the beginning of 1917. This came from members of the Duma and several of the grand dukes of the imperial family. Nicholas continued to refuse the change from autocracy that had been in power for the past 300 years.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The line “…by authorities whom We shall appoint” clearly shows how the Tsar is reluctant to give his people their rights as he wanted to keep his power and the system of Autocracy in Russia. This can be amplified in a letter to his ‘dearest mama’ on the 2nd of November, 1905, “…this terrible decision, which I nevertheless took quite consciously” further reinforcing the fact that Nicholas II was not sincere in improving his own nation from the release of the October Manifesto . The contradicting statements in the October Manifesto further stimulated the growing discontent of the people as the rights that they are given are still limited by Tsar Nicholas. As Trotsky states in 1905, “Everything is given and nothing is given”. Therefore, the release of the October Manifesto was a key event…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays