Tsar Nicholas II Mistakes Essay

Improved Essays
Show More
Since the early 1600’s Russia had been ruled by the Romanov family. The final Tsars were increasingly ineffective and when Tsar Nicholas II came into power he did not fix the mistakes of the past Tsars and due to his bad leadership he is solely to blame for bringing his country into ruin which in turn led to his downfall, however, the people of Russia were eager for change because of the mistakes of the past Tsars and Nicholas II could not govern the entire country and keep them from wanting a revolution.

During the course of Nicholas II reign he made various mistakes that contributed to his downfall. Nicholas II’s father, Alexander II, brought a police of Russification which stated that the non-native people of Russia must give up their …show more content…
In 1914 World War 1 broke out and Nicholas II decided to take control of the army. The government was left to be controlled by the Tsarina and Rasputin who had their own interests in mind. Due to most supplies being dedicated towards the war effort there was a shortage in food and the people starved and grew angry with the Tsar. The Duma would not help the people’s concern and as such they began to support the revolutionary parties such as the Mensheviks, Bolsheviks and Social Revolutionaries. As the war effort continued most of the people in Russia were calling for peace but the Tsar would not leave the war so they grew ready to revolt against the crown. In February 1917 the people of Russia reached their breaking point. Rasputin was killed by a group of nobles and the Female textile workers of Russia went on a hunger strike and were joined by all of the workers in Petrograd. The Cossacks and army were sent to control the crowds and stop them but the soldiers were also tired of the war and joined the strikes instead. The revolutionary parties led by the Mensheviks took control of all municipal and government buildings. The Duma forced the Tsar to abdicate from the throne. Tsar Nicholas ignored the peoples call for reform and governed the country as he wished which led to his forced abdication of the …show more content…
Since Tsar Alexander III took away all reforms and brutally eliminated all opposition the people of Russia were not happy with the Tsarist regime and wanted to revolt. The revolutionary parties all had their own agendas as to why each of them wanted to rule Russia. The parties believed that their own way was the best way for Russia to be ruled but they all agreed that it was time for the monarch to be ended. Tsar Nicholas II was one man and could not be expected to control the whole of Russia alone. He entrusted the Tsarina and Rasputin to help him rule and they failed to do so in a way that would improve Russia and the people’s opinion of the Tsarist regime. Russia was a large country and it was hard to hear all the people’s voices and act on what they wanted. The incident of Bloody Sunday cannot be blamed on a Tsar that was not at the palace and who therefore could not stop the Cossacks. The incident of Bloody Sunday is to be blamed on the general who gave the order to attack the innocents. As WW1 broke out and the Tsar took control to fight against the Germans who threatened to kill millions of innocents and control all of Europe the revolutionary parties were able to use the food shortages and complaints to blame the Tsar as a scapegoat to further their own agenda’s. When the time was ripe the people of Russia revolted

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The Social Structure Of Tsar Nicholas II In The 1900's
    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Social Structure Of Tsar Nicholas II In The 1900's

    A Tsar is a Russian form of King or Emperor that rules of the country as a whole. Emperor Tsar Nicholas II is the head of Russia 's government and Nobility. Given he is the emperor he lives a rich and luxurious life; owning 15,000 servants and 8 palaces. Nicholas II is known as an autocrat ruler, meaning he doesn’t have to share his power. He can do what he likes without consulting anyone as there is no parliament to limit his power and can sack any minister or adviser who disagrees with him. With a country of nearly 125 million people it is impossible for 1 person to govern and exercise his authority across the whole country. To aid the Tsars in their government they employed 3 major associations: The Church, The Bureaucracy and The Police.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tsarist Autocracy
    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Tsarist Autocracy

    The sovereignty of Nicholas II led to the ultimate collapse and diminishment of autocratic rule in Russia. The statement, “The fundamental reason why the old regime collapsed was the personality and weak leadership of the Tsar,” is significantly accurate as demonstrated through the decisions and responses of the Tsar during and post many events including: bloody Sunday in 1905, the 1905 revolution and Russia’s contribution in World war 1. The Tsar’s significantly poor responses to the events led to Russia’s ultimate recession and deterioration in political, economic and social factors. Nicholas’…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Who Is Responsible For The Tsar's Downfall
    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who Is Responsible For The Tsar's Downfall

    The tsars had no interest in ruling but still aimed to uphold the autocratic ruling of his father Alexandra III. The tsar’s education made him believed, it is right to have all control and power over Russia as “god” appointed him as tsar. He had absolute power meaning he can make laws, overrule laws, appoint minsters, and advise at will without being questioned. The tsar had many minsters that advised him about the affairs and policies of Russia yet he only took the advice that was appealing to him and never altered his policies. Many of his minsters described the tsar as charming and but he had a lack of knowledge and will power that disqualified him as being an effective tsar. This is evident in the book History of the Russian Revolution by Leon Trotsky where he depicts “The daily work of a monarch he found intolerably boring. He could not stand listening long or seriously to…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Impact Of Rasputin On The Downfall Of Tsarist Russia
    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Impact Of Rasputin On The Downfall Of Tsarist Russia

    Nicholas II of Russia was the last emperor of Russia (1st November 1894 to 15th March 1917). His reign saw the dramatic fall of the imperial Russian empire. After the Febuary revolution of 1917 Nicholas was forced to abdicate the throne. In 1918, Nicholas and his family were tragically executed by the Bolsheviks. The dramatic downfall of Tsar Nicholas was the ended the Romanov dynasty in Russia. It ended autocracy as a political system in Russia and lead to the creation of the Soviet Union which went on to spark major tensions with the world in the Cold War. This historical turning point shaped much of 20th century history and the lives of over 293 million people.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Causes And Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty
    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Causes And Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty

    The Romanov Dynasty reigned in Russia from 1613 until its fall in 1917. It was the last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. The fall was prompted by the February Revolution of 1917 which lead to abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. The fall of the Romanov Dynasty was precipitated by a number of changes in Russia, specifically changing attitudes towards the autocratic power held by the Tsar and a shift in the way many Russians viewed the Tsar himself. Many of these changes were caused by the advancement of Russia in terms of industry and the fact that Industrialisation had finally reached Russia. World War I also preceded the dynasty 's collapse, thus contributing to these changes in Russian society. The causes of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty are…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall
    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II Downfall

    Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The use of sources throughout this essay would amplify the idea, in which Nicholas II played a major role in contributing to his own downfall and eventual…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty Essay
    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Fall Of The Romanov Dynasty Essay

    Tsar Nicholas was responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty and accelerating the russian revolution. Tsar Nicholas was a major cause of the downfall but his wife tsarina and Rasputin also contributed. The tsar left to the war which was already creating uproar in russia as it was weakening the economy, creating worldwide hunger and unhappiness throughout. Unhappiness lead to demonstrations that developed into political action against the tsar. Furthermore the tsar;s leadership and understanding of reality was abysmal during the war. he was associated with all the defeats the poorly equipped russian army had. In his absence he left the trasie alexander ruled,…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Far Was Rasputin Responsible For The Collapse Of The Tsarist Regime Case Study
    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Far Was Rasputin Responsible For The Collapse Of The Tsarist Regime Case Study

    However, there are many longer term factors that could be held responsible for the collapse of the Tsarist regime, Russia was also a very backward nation and because of that it suffered many long-term social and economic problem such as extreme poverty and inequality, which led to a rise in opposition to the Tsarist regime and many revolutionary groups.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II: An Overseer And A Leader
    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II: An Overseer And A Leader

    During the pre revolutionary Russian revolution was incompetent; Nicholas could not manage Russia’s vast population and stop anyone who oppose or try to help him. He was always suspicious of anyone that might pose a threat to his sovereignty. Additionally, his advisors and top officials were fundamental bases on loyalty than skills. The government was inefficient and corrupted. A historian Richard Pipes argues that,”the revolution was the result not of insufferable conditions but of irreconcilable attitudes of a clash between those who wanted sweeping changes in government and a government whose ruler refused to change anything”(Collapse of Tsarist Russia). Tsar refused to change his government and Russia were based on his own ideas. Tsar Nicholas II try to create a government for the citizens to help them obtain liberty and fairness. Nicholas felt that his ruling was divine rights that he try to striped away or undermine the Duma of their power. He refused to give anyone his power. He wanted to preserve as much autocracy; a system of government by one people with absolute power. He created a group called the Duma; without any political power. Nicholas II repressed opposition by while or executing his foe; the Duma met once before Tsar eliminated them. Russia was constantly changing; many citizens had different opinion about what the government should be; but…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did The Provisional Government Have Authority Without Power
    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The Provisional Government Have Authority Without Power

    The Russian Revolution occurred in a series of separate revolutions in 1917. After people grew more and more unhappy with the autocrat government, Nicholas II decided to step down from his position of being Tsar leading into him being the last Tsar of Romanov rule. After this, a Provisional Government as well as the Petrograd Soviet political groups were created after Tsar Nicholas II stepped down from his autocrat position. Both of these groups had forms of authority as well as power but, to a great extent it is true that the Provisional Government had “authority without power” through the military, while the Petrograd Soviet had “power without authority” from the support of the people.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Downfall Of Tsardom Analysis
    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Downfall Of Tsardom Analysis

    Innumerable historians have tried over the past century to pinpoint the exact moment and reason that led to the fall of Tsar Nicholas II, who was the Emperor of the Russian Empire. However, the downfall of Tsardom cannot be perceived as an event or even a long process, but rather as a consequence of the Russian Revolution of 1917 as well as a sequence of unmanageable and highly antagonistic acts that involved contrasting parties, which occurring simultaneously consequently led to Russia’s collapse.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper
    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tsar Nicholas II Research Paper

    During Tsar Nicholas's rule more than half the population was in poverty and war was both unavoidable and unwinnable. Although Tsar Nicholas was not ready to rule it does not mean that the Tsar family was always so…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    How Did Tsar Nicholas Follow World War I?
    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Did Tsar Nicholas Follow World War I?

    Russia had been lagging behind the rest of Europe when it came to industry and modernity, but they were toward the beginning of the revolutionary movement. When World War I came about, Russians believed the war would be a short one and that they would not need to make use of all of their resources, such as soldiers and supplies. Tsar Nicholas put his faith into a Russian victory for the sake of national unity (EUROPE 165). Against Nicholas’s original beliefs, the war raged on, and peasants in Russia experienced even more unrest. Intellectuals became revolutionaries, and a regime was desired that “would let Russia catch up to the west” (SOURCES 84). Those against the monarchy touted that they were turning “disorders into a revolution” (EUROPE 168) while they “destroyed the symbols of tsarism and attacked the rich”…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Causes Of Bloody Nicholas: The First Russian Revolution
    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Causes Of Bloody Nicholas: The First Russian Revolution

    Tsar, Nicholas II at the brink of the 1905 Revolution after months of rioting, protesting and disorder ran amok. Nicholas II would finally promise the formation of a Duma and a National Parliament which would have a Prime Minister elected, by the people of Russia. This would allow the people and the government to have what was thought to have some power and for the people to participate towards the nation. This would give one main and important need to in particular, the peasants who made up the population of Russia and would give more rights and freedom which was the main reason for the 1905 “revolution”. This satisfied the Russian people enough to gain a halt on their outcry and unrest, enough for the Tsar to regain control of Russia, the main purpose of this tactic. (THE OCTOBER MANIFESTO,…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Tsarist Russia Essay
    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tsarist Russia Essay

    The Tsarist regime in Russia had begun deteriorating in the early 1900s due to widespread political, social, and economic instability. Both the Russo-Japanese War and WW1 exacerbated the situation, leading to higher levels of discontent amongst the people. Below I will analyse the fall of Tsarist Russia from 3 aspects: the political, social, and economic before and after the wars, and explain how each of these factors played a crucial role in the collapse of the Tsarist regime.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings