Trustee Model Of Representation Research Paper

Improved Essays
Morgan Garcia
Professor Crammer
Political Science
21 April 2015
America’s Finest Model of Representation As a Democratic country our nation thrives on the basic ideology that we are properly represented in our government; where our voices are being heard and that decisions are fairly being made in the favor of the people. The major dilemma with representation is deciding what model of representation is best suited for the constituents. The Trustee Model of Representation and the Delegate Model of Representation are on opposite sides of the spectrum when it comes to deciding what is good and proper for American citizens and their different ideologies conflict with each other in every way. While the Delegate Model of Representation caters
…show more content…
It can be best compared with a security system; a security system does all the work for you, they watch out for your safety and well-being while you relax knowing you are in the rights hands. As a Trustee Representative, they may make decisions that appear to be unwanted or not favorable, but a trustee always knows that what they’re doing is making a decision that in the long run will put the constituents in a position that will better them. Trustee representatives are better off because they follow their own understanding of a dilemma and act out in the best course of action for the people. While a delegate representative will focus on a small group of constituents, a trustee will guarantee that the nation is represented as a whole and that what is right for a community will be right for every community and the U.S entirely. This is what makes a Trustee Model of Representation superior over a Delegate, they take the population’s problems and preferences into consideration but will ultimately perform in a matter that will benefit the entirety of the American people and not just focus on a specific social class or a portion of the …show more content…
In issues like Government Corruption and the issue of homeland security, it is preferred that we leave our trust into representatives who know the details and the knowledge to represent our worries and issues in the best way possible. As citizens we often feel obligated to get involved in the government on a more personal level hoping that we ourselves can make an impact with our proposed options and decisions. The problem with that is we do not always know what is best for ourselves. For example, if our nation was proposing ways to crack down on heavier security by heavier border patrol and restricting access to and from other countries, it is best that we rely on our trustee representative to represent our worries and concerns about the issue rather than trying to take the situation onto ourselves. If our representative believes that it is in our best interest to follow these strict guidelines of enforcement then we need to trust in him or her that they made the best choice for all of us that will eventually show to be the best outcome

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    A decentralized Congress protects and enhances individual interest, although quick decision making is sacrificed and delays and discussion must be allowed. However, the delays in time can lead to more thoughtful decision making. The people do not favor Congress because they feel it doesn't represent the viewpoint of the people and they are slow in their decision making. 7.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Federalist No. 10 Analysis

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When James Madison outlines the dangers of faction in Federalist No. 10, he defines faction as “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united...by some common...interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens.” 1 This wording is critical for examining both the goals and pivotal ideas of the federalist movement. At first glance, this definition seems to reflect the very real fear of mob uprising. Certainly, it’s tone insinuates an image of mob citizenry diametrically opposed to a smaller elite. However, although this image may have captured this political component of the United States in November 1787, a closer inspection yields a less controversial interpretation.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this document Madison argues that delegation will destroy the disruptive nature of factions because it will “refine and enlarge the public views, by passing them through the medium of a chosen body of citizens, whose wisdom may best discern the true interest of their country.” While I agree, it is the best interest of the country to have the most qualified individuals in office, for much of history voting was a privilege given to a minority of people – even among white males. This lack of representation made it impossible for other demographics to be given a voice in government. When ratified, the Constitution allowed the states to run their own elections thereby limiting…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Constitutional Framers

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During the Constitutional Convention, when the framers took up the charge of creating the document that would see the newly formed nation into an ambiguous future they were met with a lengthy list of challenges. If the document they created was not definitive and resilient it would not endure. It had to be more than just a guide to the way Americans should behave towards one another, it also had ensure that one’s chosen to lead could not abuse the authority given to them at the expense of the people. For the purposes of this paper we will focus on representation, excessive democracy and governmental oversight.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statistics of anger at Congress by the American people are not surprising, nor are they new: “Fifty-seven percent (57%) say Congress is doing a poor job… just 24% think their representative in Congress is the best possible person for the job” (Rasmussen Report). So while the argument remains that what the Founding Fathers asked for this, there is a reason the Constitution allows for amendments and calls itself a democracy: change is allowed. However difficult, however many Congressmen (and women) who have found their desks in Rayburn, Longworth or Canon House Office Buildings comfortable for decades, Americans remain disappointed in a representation plagued with problematic…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A Critique of Fiorina’s “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics” In the early 1980s, political scientists were studying the changing status of American political parties (Fiorina 1981). During this time, Morris P. Fiorina wrote his essay to address these findings, most notably what he believes to be the decline of political parties. Fiorina concludes that strong political parties provide electoral accountability and discipline in government and keep the system afloat. Without it, the consequences are dire.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The promise of America has always been that it would be a government by the people, for the people. However, gerrymandering is and ever-looming threat to American ideals, and is potentially one of the biggest threats to equal representation for Americans. By further understanding what this phenomenon is and how the nature of undermined representation manifests itself though the gerrymandering of congressional districts, it can be deduced how basic American values are potentially compromised through these actions. To gain a more holistic view on America’s tradition of gerrymandering, it is important to first grasp the basics and then the relationship the facts have with American ideals in order to properly understand the true extent gerrymandering has on American values.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the first chapter of William E. Hudson’s book American Democracy in Peril, Hudson discusses the reasoning and application of the separation of powers stemmed from the Constitution, and the impact it has had as well as the failures that came as a consequence of it. Due to the changing meaning of the Jeffersonian model, one of the failures Hudson argues is that the separation of powers in a partisan, party-based system falls apart once both parties are to blame. It is also argued that the same system creates a political minority “biased against change” to protect against the supposed tyranny of the majority. Hudson ends by making a case in favor of a change in government towards the form of a parliament for the sake of accountability and protection…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As a country founded on the ideals of freedom and liberty, the United States of America created a Constitution with democracy at its core. Although the Framers strenuously debated on how democratic the Constitution should be, the product of their efforts produced a document that has served as the basis for the democratic republic that America is today. However, some individuals, such as Robert Dahl, a political theorist and an author, illustrate the specific areas of the Constitution that have failed to promote its democratic quality. One of his most tenacious arguments lies with the dysfunctionality of the Electoral College, which he regards as a major contribution to the undemocratic character of the Constitution. He provides two distinctive…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this sense, proponents argue that the process “somehow preserves federalism or small states ' legitimate interests” (Edwards 2005, p. 11). One concern of the democratic process is developing methods for maintaining equal representation across all states despite their size. Imbalances due to the weight given to states, the potential for the winner to lose the popular vote, and disproportionate advantages are all cited as major failures of the Electoral College in adhering to democratic principles. Proponents for direct elections cite these implications as a source of criticism of the current system. The national attention on those states that have the variability for political competition can cause an imbalance in issues that candidates consider (Grofman & Feld, 2009).…

    • 1854 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the course we have read about elections and the Electoral College. We have also read about the Federalists who had interest for the “few” and the Anti-Federalist who had interest for the “many.” Instead of the American people directly choosing their next president, the framers established the Electoral College system which essentially gave a small group of appointed people called “electors” the ability to make that choice. The Constitution did not include how these people would be appointed or who would appoint them, but it was rather a decision made by each state as to how.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Notably, the book (The Logic Of American Politics) is full of interesting facts; some are more similar than you think. In fact, chapter one discusses The Logic of American Politics, which lead to the development of The Constitution in chapter two. In relation to that, chapter three explains Federalism, which created the need for Civil Rights. In turn, Chapter five concludes the relationship between the chapters with Civil Liberties. While reading, I have acknowledged that chapters one through five are different in several ways, however, they can be tied together in relation to one another due to shared facts.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress: A Broken Government Throughout history, scholars, politicians, and the general public have been divided into two separate categories: those who agree that Congress is not a broken government and those who disagree with the former and argue that Congress is a broken government. While many factors point toward either argument, the most prominent answer is that Congress is, indeed, broken. The design of Congress, the founder’s intentions for Congress, and the Washington Establishment are among some of the many reasons that reveal plainly the brokenness of the government and allow others to see the dysfunction of Congress as well. Congress is designed to be made up of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States of America was founded on the rights, freedoms, and liberties of its people. The founding Fathers of our country based our government on democratic values, which are transparent in the Constitution of the United States. One of the main founders was James Madison, who was very critical of government and democracy. Madison created a Theory of Democracy based on a solution to solve the defects of political activity in our government. Democratic deficiency is explained in the article Democratic Practice and Democratic Theory by Bernard R. Berelson.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays