Atomic Bomb Justified

Great Essays
What would you do if you were faced with two impossible decisions? One decision left people dead. The other decision left other people dead. Neither choice looks good, and neither choice comes out pretty. This situation is exactly what President Truman faced in the use of Atomic Bombs in WWII. He was faced with perhaps the biggest choice any man has ever had to face. War is known for being messy, dirty, and downright horrid. War is never going to be a pretty picture, despite the glamorization movies sometimes like to portray. War is horrifically, and disgustingly ugly. There is no question about it. In WWII, America was at war with some of the most powerful countries in the world. The United states and its Allies against the Axis …show more content…
Without it, thousands of American lives would have been lost. However, the moral aspect of both attacks has been dividing historians for years. Some argue that the attacks and the use of the bombs were justified because it ended the war and because less American lives were shed. To counter these ideas, other historians would argue that it was immoral to use the bombs because of the massive amount of Japanese lives that were shed. All in all, no matter what side is chosen, it is important to take into account the positives that came about. The war would not have been ended as quickly if it weren’t for the bombs. Some people forget that the Japanese’ core beliefs center around their war strategies. Their mindset is different than the American way. They inherently believe that it would be better to die fighting than to surrender. The only way that the war would have ended was if something utterly drastic took place. The atomic bomb did more than that. It detrimentally wiped out a huge population of Japan. Moreover, the Japanese were tricked into believing the United states may use yet another atomic bomb, which they could not afford. Though the most brutal use of any weapon ever known to man, the atomic bomb helped end WWII and bring peace to nations

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If the United States had tested the bomb and it failed to persuade Japanese leaders to surrender, they would have been left with one bomb to use before more were produced. The United States could have pursued options other than the atomic bomb to end the war against Japan. Incendiary bombings had already destroyed multiple cities, destroying the war and industrial capacity of the country, and with the embargo in place, there was no way for them to receive crucial materials for production. Japan had already been defeated, and would have surrendered with or without the dropping of the bombs. An alternative to the bomb could have been a demonstration of the power, convincing Japanese leaders to…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The bomb seemed to be the only way to get Japan to surrender, of course it was very extreme, and seemed far too aggressive, despite the rage both countries had against each other. However, the United States government thought otherwise and dropped not one, but two atomic bombs…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Maddox, the American officials thought that the Japanese would say something else about the explosion. They would not believe that the bomb were an Atomic bomb. They believed that Japanese hard-liners would make up something to not believe that is was a Atomic bomb. They said it was a natural catastrophe that had occurred. Even the Japanese minister of war did not believe that the town Hiroshima just had been bombed by an atomic bomb.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited

    The scientists were servants, paid to complete what the U.S. want them to (Morley). Only a few people who worked on the bomb actually knew what they were doing with it (Thomas, 23). The scientists had to think of the morality of the subject. They believed Japan should not have to go without warning that an atomic bomb would be dropped. In the end, Japan was warned from leaflets that bombs would be dropped, but not until the city was in ruins which makes the bombing even worse.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 16 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether it was through the loss of loved ones or the grotesque disfiguration many experienced, the catastrophe the Japanese people suffered through cannot be justified morally by America’s incentive of winning the war. Aside from the devastating physical ramifications, the actions of President Truman also had significant political implications. The reveal of the atomic bomb to the world affected the way the rest of the word viewed warfare as well as “showed how each super power would use any tactic possible to gain an advantage over their enemy” ("The Effects of the Atomic Bomb Politically and Socially"). This ultimately changes the standards of morality during war time and leads to the rapid advancement of military technology. Because the impact of the atomic bomb was so devastating, it prompted many other nations to respond with the development of their own weapons of mass destruction.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the alternative of waiting for help from the Soviet Union would have been helpful, Truman believed that it wouldn’t necessarily put an end to the war. However, the decision to drop the atomic bomb was based on multiple crucial factors. One reason was that Truman was determined to end the war as soon as possible. Many American troops were being killed or injured and America needed some relief from war. Another reason was that the United States wanted to get revenge on Japan for the attacks that were made in Pearl Harbor.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Even today, many debate whether or not the US should have dropped the atomic bombs. Not only have the bombs killed many Japanese, the bombs also caused radiation sickness. However, these bombs were effective in that they ended one of the most costly wars the world has seen. Although the results of the atomic bombs were devastating to Japan, the US was justified in dropping the bombs because it swiftly ended the war, which effectively saved more lives than it costed.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the American’s didn’t do this, they would’ve been in a much worse situation and would raise up to surrender. 4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The atomic bomb was more devastating than the fire-bombings the United States dropped on Japan even though the fire-bombings had a higher death toll. But, why did the United States believe that the atomic bomb would end the war? The simple reason would be that the atomic bombs did not end the war. Top military officials agreed that the atomic bombs played no decisive role in ending the war . It was more likely that the United States wanted to test out the new weapon they had made and its effects on a real city, which is why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as the real world testing grounds.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays