Trophic Levels

Improved Essays
First of all, despite the question, I believe that people should follow what we always been doing and not to change just because. However, if I had to choose, I think eat at a lower trophic level would be more beneficial to humans. Now days, people are usually eaten higher on the food chain, but this could be not as efficient environmentally. As the trophic level goes up, 90% of the energy will be lost which means that we are only getting 10% of our food’s energy, the rest are being used to make heat. One of most commonly used example would be beef. Cows eat grass, and we eat cows. 90% of energy will be lost from grass to cow, and we are receiving 10% of cow’s energy. If we just decided to eat grass (vegetables), we will gain much more energy.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As the authors point out in the book, The Omnivoreś Dilemma, is the process our food takes before it comes to our table. Also the impact the food has on our environment and on our health. Before people eat, they should really think about the positive and negative impacts it has on the world first. Many people could use other chains, but hunter gathers is unrealistic based on where we live in. I feel local sustainability is a good choice and is less harmful, more natural, less transportation.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Omnivore Dilemma Analysis

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In this book The Omnivore Dilemma leads that path of food came from farming due to those what we eat. Michael Pollan show that what we eat we should eat and what food we eat shouldn’t due to those food chains. Pollan argues that we get of our food even the food that is sold as organic from an industrial food chain. He says that this food chain is negative for the environment, harming for the animals that are raised in it, and bad for the quality of the food that it produces.…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Omnivore's Dilemma

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michael Pollan’s book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, he writes about the journey that our food takes from the farm to our plates. The “omnivore’s dilemma” can be seen as humanity not thinking about everything that goes into making the foods that society enjoy, such as corn-based products. Our agriculture business produces tons of corn every year and corn is an important part of our society. His book is attempting to show the negative sides to the agriculture business that is in place today. Society has known for years that the current system is not a good system, yet it has not changed.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Industrial Food Chain

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Which Food Chain is Best to Feed America? Delicious. McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King, and more. All of these fast food restaurants are all examples of the Industrial Food Chain. How often do you have fast food?…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Omnivore's Dilemma Summary

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Living Off the Food Systems Three distinct food production systems make up our everyday food choices. Some Americans will never move past the very first food chain where little connection exists between nature and the plate. In Michael Pollan’s book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, he walks through and explores each food chain in detail. Pollan holds a strong desire to closely experience every aspect of the processes and origins of the food that humans eat. His introduction explains what the book’s message and journey are all about: “Omnivore’s Dilemma is about the three principal food chains that sustain us today: the industrial, the organic, and the hunter-gatherer.…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ¢ Write 2-3 sentences explaining why this is your decision and why it best suits the challenge of this task. I have chosen to do my lunch box like this as it has a variety, it is different, has the five food groups and I like all the food that is in it. Not every day I have time to sit and think about my lunch so doing something different makes it more delicious and it is different so it is not boring. Evaluation- ¢ How can a lunch be nutritious, interesting, innovative and sustainable?…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So far in sections one and two of Micheal Pollan, The Omnivores Dilemma, it seems as is all food chains have negative effects on us, the enviorment, as well as the animals we get it from. However that is not true. In this section, Micheal Pollan argues that the food chain called Local Sustainable is the best food chain there is for everyone and everything, they do not use chemical fertilizers or chemical pesticde which is harmful to everyone, they don’t pollute they enviorment because they recyle everything used in the farm and thye don’t burn fossil fuels, and before the animals live their lives as free wild animas should. One piece of the argument that Michael Pollan sides with-that the Local Sustainable food chain is the best one for us,…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By taking the time and patience to grow plants, you reap the benefits of eating natural ingredients straight from the ground. However, this is where the ‘cheap energy mindset’ starts to step in. People argue that they simply don’t have the time or expenses to plant a garden. Well keep in mind, planting a garden is not the only solution we have at our disposal. I myself am no active gardener, but I do perform smaller task like recycling or buying from the local farmer’s market.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If animal agriculture had this much of an impact over one hundred and seventy years ago, imagine the magnitude of impact it is having today. To provide land for the livestock, feed crops, slaughterhouses, and grazing fields, animal agriculture uses nearly seventeen million square miles of land. That’s about thirty percent of the earth’s land mass. Twenty-six percent of all ice-free land, seventy percent of all farming land, and thirty percent of all plant land surface is dedicated to animal agriculture. Vegetarian diets only require a portion of the thirty-three percent of farming land that animal agriculture uses, since one acre of plants can feed more humans than it can animals.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grass- fed beef is better for you and also the environment. This is a cheaper option that will help eliminate harmful gases into the…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I know this can be a sensitive subject because people have a strong allegiance tied to certain foods because the connection that food has with our emotions and personal experiences. However, please suspend your immediate reactions and defenses, to hear another side that you may not be aware of. Not consuming animal products and having a plant-based diet is beneficial to people’s health and could make a significant impact on the extermination of world hunger, animal cruelty and animal exploitation. Having a plant-based diet will give countless benefits to our health, planet and have been proven to cure illnesses. You can acquire more vitamins and nutrients from vegetables than any animal product and if you eat enough, will feel the same fullness that you felt when…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It’s no question that it is more efficient to produce plants than it is to produce meat. “Leading scientists have warned us that food shortages will become escalade over the next 40 years unless the world 's population switches almost completely to a vegetarian diet” (Walsh 57). Not only is it not cost efficient, but the consuming meat has been linked to multiple diseases and obvious health risks. A plant based diet would improve the obesity crisis America currently suffers through. The number of positive outcomes a meat free diet can introduce to upbringing generations is endless.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We live on a beautiful and life giving planet that we don’t want to see being destroyed but still it seems that we carry out extreme and illogical activities that counter that presumption. Humans by nature are selfish and although that is something we cannot change anytime soon, there needs to be some sort of education for people to understand their actions that they play on the environment. We only have one planet and we should take care of it. The incredible devastation that animal agriculture is causing to our planet is alarming and not enough is being done about it. The E.P.A. recommends that individuals reduce their dependence of energy come from fossil fuels but new studies are now showing that the fact is that our incredibly immense practice of…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The chances of earth’s environment declining will only increase if humanity continues its meat eating habits, due to the global effects that raising livestock cause to the climate. It has recently been made known to the public on a larger scale, that one of the greatest factors to the ozone layer being damaged is from raising livestock. It is up to us to fix this issue before it makes the world an unlivable place. We have to do this now instead of later. Recently, a group of environmentalists wanted to help save the planet, so they did as much research as they could to find the real issues.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people don’t realize what we eat has such an impact on our Earth and the people in it. Two of the issues with livestock is that it takes 2,500 gallons of water and twelve pounds of grain to produce only one pound of beef. 80-90% of US water is used for agriculture and over half of the U.S. grain is being fed to livestock instead of being used for direct human consumption, and animal agriculture is one of the leading causes of world hunger. Animal agriculture is also responsible for 91% of amazon destruction and has an extremely negative impact on climate change. The documentary Cowspiracy says “Animal Agriculture is responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays