Oj Simpson Evidence

The OJ Simpson Evidence In the year 1995, one of the most controversial cases was on trial and this case was the Oj Simpson. Furthermore, during this case there were many controversies, since the crime was committed until the point of conviction. Moreover, the crime was committed the night of June 12, of 1994, since then no one knows the exact occurrences of that night that led to the homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman (Linder, 2000). However, the main controversy of the case was the form the evidence was handle by the officials of that night. Foremost, as the case progressed many tremendous errors were notice in the gathering of the evidence that constituted to outcome of the case (List of the evidence in the O.J. Simpson …show more content…
Moreover, they argue that Simpson use size 12 shoes and that the shoes found were the same size. Foremost, the prosecution also tried to convince the jury that he was at murder scene with those shoes. They by showed proof that does shoes can be found at Bloomingdale, New York were Simpson goes shopping. However, the defense would say that do shoes could have been bought my many and that the prosecution had no proof that Simpson had bought them (The Associated Press, 1996). Likewise, the third evidence was the hairs and fibers found at the crime scene. The prosecution claimed that this evidence corroborated that Simpson was at the crime scene. In addition, the witnessed said that Simpson was wearing a dark sweat suit and dark blue sweat suit fibers were found on Ronald’s body (The Associated Press, 1996). On the other hand, the defense counterattack by saying that ten percent of Los Angeles has black hair and that was unreliable evidence. The defense would also claim that Simpson hair had dandruff and that the hair found had none. Moreover, they argue that no dark blue sweat suit was ever found and that the fiber could have fallen out of the blankets that they took out of Nicole’s house to cover the bodies (The Associated Press, 1996). Thus, the fourth evidence was the bloody gloves; which the defense argues that Simpson had dropped them during the occurrence of the crime and that the …show more content…
This writer would classify in the identification categories the hair, the dark blue sweat suit fiber, and the bloody shoes. The reasons for them to be classified in this category is, because they cannot determined exactly from who they belong for that reason they can be from anyone. Furthermore, in the individualization category the bloody socks and gloves, because they contained Simpson’s DNA. Lastly the bloody bronco can be classified under reconstruction, because it can describe how the aggressor got and left the crime scene. Moreover, the evidence presented at the court can be used to describe how, when, and where the crime occur. Foremost, the proper use of this evidence could have led to the conviction of Simpson, but due to the misuse it benefited the defense. However, the blood that was found that had DNA of Simpson it could definitely prove that he was there when the crime occur. In addition, the evidence that was presented in the court had it many issues it was improperly handle. Foremost, it was described that the glove was never packed, and therefore it shrink (The Associated Press, 1996). In addition, the evidence should have the chain of custody, so there was more control over the evidence. Likewise, it was argue that the bronco was taken out of the impound place and taken back to the crime scene, and with chain of custody that