Many problems have faced society for centuries and still social issues relevant in today’s society. Many people have tried to bring people’s attention to these social issues in many different ways, including stories and poems. Treatment of the disabled have been a social issue for many years and is still an issue in today’s modern world. For example, the disabled do not have the same opportunities sometimes as others. A writer James Meikle, goes into debt on just how the disabled are not able to do things everyone else can. The author states,“It is disgraceful that only 1% of space at sporting venues is available for disabled fans” (Meikle). The disabled still do not have access to go to most big events because people do not recognize this
…show more content…
Gun control does not show any statistics proving that it helps prevents shooting. It only takes away people’s Constitutional rights to bear arms. Duke. L.J. rewrites the Second Amendment when he states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of the State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Duke L.J). This right was given to the people from the founding fathers because they believed that it was necessary for the people to bear arms. The Second Amendment right was created for the soul purpose of protecting the American people for defense. Not hunting, not for sport or a hobby, but for the defense and safety against the government if ever needed be. In the article, “Self-Defense of Others, And The State”, the author states, “Self-defense is not a creature of constitutions, common law, history, or tradition, but is written into the soul of man by God” (Miller). The right to bear arms cannot be taken away by man because this right was given to the people by God himself. Some people do not agree with this argument. The counterargument given is a very different way of thinking. They say that this right was given to the people when they had less powerful guns. So with there being more dangerous guns available that right should be taken away from the people. Therefor wanting to take away the guns of people who follow the law and are exercising their right. The opposing side, usually run by the Democrats, have tried to create acts like this for many year. In an article the author states, “Under the 1968 Gun Control Act “were aimed at ordinary citizens who had neither criminal intent nor knowledge”” (Cynthia M. Menta). This act wanted to take this right away from citizens who used the guns in the right way. This right to bear arms was written in the Constitution so the people could
Gun control does not show any statistics proving that it helps prevents shooting. It only takes away people’s Constitutional rights to bear arms. Duke. L.J. rewrites the Second Amendment when he states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of the State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Duke L.J). This right was given to the people from the founding fathers because they believed that it was necessary for the people to bear arms. The Second Amendment right was created for the soul purpose of protecting the American people for defense. Not hunting, not for sport or a hobby, but for the defense and safety against the government if ever needed be. In the article, “Self-Defense of Others, And The State”, the author states, “Self-defense is not a creature of constitutions, common law, history, or tradition, but is written into the soul of man by God” (Miller). The right to bear arms cannot be taken away by man because this right was given to the people by God himself. Some people do not agree with this argument. The counterargument given is a very different way of thinking. They say that this right was given to the people when they had less powerful guns. So with there being more dangerous guns available that right should be taken away from the people. Therefor wanting to take away the guns of people who follow the law and are exercising their right. The opposing side, usually run by the Democrats, have tried to create acts like this for many year. In an article the author states, “Under the 1968 Gun Control Act “were aimed at ordinary citizens who had neither criminal intent nor knowledge”” (Cynthia M. Menta). This act wanted to take this right away from citizens who used the guns in the right way. This right to bear arms was written in the Constitution so the people could