What clearly emerges from my analysis of the transhumanist and bioconservative views is that the implementation and development of implantable memory chips raises a lot of ethical issues that would affect individuals, communities and societies. Transhumanists think that it is our duty to commit ourselves to the progress of memory enhancing implants in order to develop a better quality of life and better societal systems. Bioconservatives say that memory enhancing chips should be prohibited or limited in use since it could pose a threat to our privacy, freedom, equality, safety, autonomy, individuality, human dignity and our self-relationship of the mind to the body.
In my assessment it also becomes clear that the major difference between
In my assessment it also becomes clear that the major difference between