Congruence between a leader and the society that supports them, is necessary for a leader to be followed (Mustafa & Lines, 2013). This can be demonstrated in individual versus collective societies in which different values will give rise to different types of leaders. Individualistic societies tend to associate a higher degree of significance to personal versus group interest (Mustafa & Lines, 2013). The opposite is generally true of collectivist, with greater emphasis put on group interests. These societal variations are likely to be seen within an organization also, and play a part in how a leader would be expected to lead. Depending on the situation, there are times when an organization may find shared leadership and group performance an alternative to more traditional leadership behavior (Drescher, Korsgaard, Welpe, Picot, & Wigand, …show more content…
Instilling a sense of leadership into a team can bring about many of the positive features of a group, like pooling resources, security, and shared goals (Markman, 2012). The focus then becomes one of minimizing the potential negative aspects of a group, while maximizing the positive potential. How a group sees itself can influence its views, which in turn can impact the decisions that are made; a leader can directly help to increase self-awareness, while also creating a safe environment for a group. Creating a culture in which information, even unfavorable information, can be shared without fear of reprisal, will help to keep a group from experiencing such things as group polarization and groupthink (Aamodt, 2016; Wu & Wang, 2014). The productivity of groups and teams can also be improved, particularly when a transformational style of leadership is used. In a study by Wu and Wang (2014), it was shown that transformational leadership positively influenced the group affective tone, which allowed for a team to become strengthened and be more proactive in its general approach to