The Stanford Prison Experiment Character Analysis

Superior Essays
In our society, we often tend to act and adapt into a situation that we are not familiar with such as getting into a character for a role in a story or a gimmick that provides a different persona that we are not supposed to be but we still do it in order for the sake of the role or gimmick we want to transform in. We often want to bring life to a character that we don’t; for example, actors get ready for a role for a show and movie in order to get into a character to have a deeper connection to the character they are portraying. Although, getting into character can actually do more harm to the person own psychological behavior that the persona they wish to become has consumed their own mental identity. For instance, Heath Ledger portraying …show more content…
Zimbardo took twenty-four male students and half of them to act prisoner inmates and prison guards. He asked them to personate the prisoners and the guards as much as they can before the experiment started. Zimbardo states, “You can create in the prisoners’ feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the systems, you, me and they’ll have no privacy…. We’re going to take away their individuality in various way. In general what all this to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation well have all the power and they have none” (Haslam & Reicher 2003). Zimbardo made some strong and powerful suggestions to the guards in order to take the part as the guard but they did it to break them emotionally. Therefore, Zimbardo was challenging the students to adapt to the situation of the prison in order for the experiment to be successful. Consequently, the students took it to a whole new level that Zimbardo and his colleagues never thought that would come across that would the prisoner student to an emotional distressed. Being thrown into a situation like that people need to be mentally prepared for any hazing or the person own self-awareness of what they were getting themselves into. In similarity, they are going in of not knowing the outcome of the experiment such as when college students getting ready to take a mid-term or final exam they think they know how the test will consist of and they studying for numerous hours but when it came down to test day all the material that they studied for the test did not conceive the same material when they were

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo Evaluation

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Zimbardo conducted a study whereby he aimed to investigate whether individuals would conform to roles of either a guard, or prisoner, in a simulated prison setting. The participants were recruited by a newspaper advertisement in the Palo Alto Times and The Stanford Daily offering…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (2008, p.282) contended that the Zimbardo experiment emphasize that it is the situation in which people find themselves and not their personal trait that largely determine their behaviour. They added that Zimbardo (2007 as cited in Baron et al. 2008, p.282) suggested that it is the tendency to yield to situational pressures, including conformity pressures that is responsible for much of the evil behaviour exhibited by the prison guards in the experiment and that people readily conform to the social role which they are expected to play, especially if they are stereotyped roles like those of prison…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    WHY WAS STANFORD’S PRISON EXPERIMENT CONDUCTED? In order to study psychological effects of prison life a experiment was conducted called “Stanford Prison Experiment”. The psychologists wanted to study what were the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. To do this experiment, a team of researchers led by the famous psychology professor named, “Philip Zimbardo” finally decided to set up a replicated prison so that they can carefully note effects of the behavior of all those within the walls of prison.…

    • 2257 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo says that the experiment showed that power corrupts and that the victims of the abuse had a hard time standing up for themselves. Zimbardo himself experienced this since he was playing the roles of both himself and that of the prison’s superintendent which he states he wouldn’t do the again. He explains that he would have someone else be the prison’s superintendent while he supervised so that he wouldn’t lose himself in the role again. It wasn’t until a colleague of his saw the boys playing the roles of prisoners marching down the hall in chains with bags over their heads that Zimbardo saw just how far this experiment had gone and how into the role he himself had gotten. Even he fell into the conformity of his role even though he wasn’t one of the guards ordering around the prisoners or one of the prisoners having to be obedient to the guards.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This came at cost with the catastrophic effects the experiment brought on the participants. The Stanford prison Experiment is noted as a “classic experiment in the psychology of human behavior (Onishi & Herbert, 2016). In this experiment, Professor Phillip Zimbardo wanted to study the effects of labels and…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Evil In Lord Of The Flies

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The prisoners were treated as a real inmate would be, they wore uniforms, ate prison food, and slept in cells. On the other hand the guards wore reflective sunglasses, uniforms, and conducted daily activity in the “prison”. This experiments effects set into place so quickly that what was meant to last for two weeks only lasted six days due to the extreme effects on both the prisoners and the guards. In an interview with The New York Times Magazine Zimbardo states, “They start off playing a game, and then there is a point at which they each, one by one, flip and become more and more extreme.” (Zimbardo).…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An ideal example of the emotional effect on prisoners is prisoner #8162. With less than 36 hours passing, #8162 began to suffer extreme emotional distress, sorrow, disorganized thinking, and anger. He became engulfed in the experiment and forgot that it was fake, telling other prisoners they cannot leave and then going on psychotic rages. Because of the severe effects he was suffering from, the researchers had not choice but to let him leave, making him understand that the prison was fabricated for an experiment that he volunteered for. Considering these findings, the conclusion for the Stanford Prison Experiment is that people will gladly conform to the social roles of their specific environment and take on the tendencies of their stereotyped roles (institutional power).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Experiment

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Finally, the environment was crafted to be brutal. The guards and prisoners may have reacted differently in a less brutal environment. "BBC study in December, 2001, two psychologists, Stephen Reicher and Alexander Haslam, tried to find out. They worked with the documentaries unit of the BBC to partially recreate Zimbardo ’s setup over the course of an eight-day experiment….Soon, more prisoners began to challenge the guards.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, author of "The Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal: Sources of Sadism," states that everyone is subjected to be a possible torturer (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Szegedy-Maszak asserts, the "unconscionable acts" committed by the Abu Ghraib were likely caused by "the anxiety and helplessness" of their horrific living conditions (Szegedy-Maszak 76). Philip G. Zimbardo, author of "The Stanford Prison Experiment," attempts to clarify the reasoning and motivation behind the sadistic acts in situations similar to the Abu Ghraib Prison Scandal. Zimbardo conducted a study where twenty-one male college students were paid fifteen dollars a day to participate in a, "mock prison," to study the psychological behavior projected from a simulated prison…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanford Prison Experiment What prevented "good guards" from objecting or countermanding the orders from tough or bad guards? The good guards were unable to object or countermand the bad guards because of the fear of what it would do to the guards’ authoritative role in the eyes of the prisoners. If they showed disunity as guards the prisoners could take advantage of the unstructured and create chaos within the walls of the prison. By objecting to the bad guards, they take the risk of the prisoners not taking the guards orders seriously.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to obtain candidates for the experiment, an advertisement was placed in the newspaper for anyone who wanted to participate in the study of how life was in prison. Seventy-five men were interviewed for the roles, but of those seventy-five, only twenty-four were chosen. They were selected at random to take and perform the roles of either prison guards or inmates. The experiment was meant to last two weeks’ time, but at the end of just six days, it was apparent that it should come to a close. Phil Zimbardo, the conductor of this experiment, was a teacher of psychology at the university.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Source A McLeod, Saul. Stanford Prison experiment. SimplyPsychology, 2008. Web. 12 Feb. 2016.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    On August 14, 1971 Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment called the Stanford Prison Experiment took off. Young men were offered $15 a day to take part in a mock prison experiment in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department. The men were divided into either prison guards or prisoners, this experiment was only to last two weeks. Upon the prisoners arrival at the make shifted prison they were stripped off their clothes and sprayed with disinfecting spray. Each prisoner was issued a dress as a uniform with their prison identification number on the back and front.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This experiment went wrong and led to mental problems. These problems became so extreme that the experiment was discontinued after 6 days instead of 2 weeks. The Stanford Prison Experiment called into question the idea of Good vs Evil. The experiment showed how situational journey can cause an individual to “compromise” their beliefs. This change in behavior lead to psychological conflict among the “guards” and “prisoners.”…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Phillip Zimbardo (1972) gave us notable understandings into human behaviour, even though considered an unethical study. In the scandalous experiment, a group of participants completed a study in a mock prison environment. Some of the participants took on the role of prisoner, and others acted as the guards. The guards behaved in an inhumane and demeaning way towards the participants acting as prisoners. They were not given full details e.g. on what to expect and how to behave.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays