Transcada Pipeline Pros And Cons

Improved Essays
A few months ago, TransCanada suggested an idea to extend its existing Energy East pipeline to start from Hardisty, Alberta and extend the end to Saint John, New Brunswick. The pipeline is expected to transport about 1,100,000 oil barrels every day and then be exported from New Brunswick. Our group represented the Government of New Brunswick and we supported the pipeline so that it could boost our economy and also help increase the employment rate among young people and Aboriginals. We wanted the pipeline to be successful and to convince other stakeholders to support the pipeline. I think I performed well, but if I could do something differently I would change the way I answered questions after the presentation and increase my level of professionalism. …show more content…
All of the disadvantages outweigh the advantages in this case, and the only benefits they will have are economic ones and even then, there are many other ways to find economic opportunities. For example, TransCanada says it will benefit the economy of New Brunswick but the fishing industry is already endangered and a big source of income for many Eastern Canadians. If any oil spills were to happen there near or in the Bay of Fundy and St. Lawrence river, it could end the industry and prove to be a major economic downfall for Eastern Canada and there’s no guarantee that oil spills won’t happen. In July 2016, almost 250,000 litres of oil mixed with hydrocarbon was spilled from a pipeline by Husky Energy into the North Saskatchewan River near Maidstone, Saskatchewan. Any spills could be devastating to cities and their water resources, and greenhouse gas emissions would increase from burning and producing oil which will increase climate change effects and also endanger the lives of Inuit people by increasing the risks of avalanches and mass ice blocks melting.

Although this pipeline is beneficial to Canada’s economy, it can have horrible environmental and social effects and the most important part of our country is our people. As the Government of New Brunswick, it’s in our favor to support the pipeline due to obvious economic opportunities and for the benefit of the people. As a Canadian citizen and a person who cares about the environment, it’s better for this pipeline not to be built for so many reasons which involve our environment, our people, our animals, and even our resources. There’s no point in money if we’re ruining our only home, which is this

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “Tarmageddon”, an essay authored by Andrew Nikiforuk, demonstrates how the tar sands have negatively impacted Canada both economically and environmentally. The environmental factors are elaborated by explaining Canada’s contribution to green house emissions and acid rain when they were once a global leader against such pollutions. Nikiforuk compares Canada as being second worst for climate change next to Saudi Arabia since they started using bitumen. He highlights the politics surrounding the issues and includes the impact of the tar sands on public policy by stating that Canada no longer has a policy on climate change and have abandoned their targets. He goes on to include Prime Minister Stephen Harpers contribution to the corruption that branch out from the province of Alberta and his personal connection as “the son of an imperial oil executive” (AR.189).…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also in the article Should the United States Authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to Import Tar Sand Oil from Canada, it talks about how, "Indigenous peoples (known as First Nations) in Canada are taking the lead to stop the largest industrial project on Mother Earth: the Tar Sands Gig project. Northern Alberta is ground zero with over 20 corporations operating in the tar sands sacrifice zone, with expanded developments being planned. The cultural heritage, land, ecosystems and human health of First Nation communities... are being sacrificed for oil money in what has been termed a 'slow industrial genocide'. Infrastructure projects linked to the tar sands expansion such as... the Keystone XL pipeline, threaten First Nation communities in British…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though there are many reasons to support why Keystone XL pipeline will be a very good idea, there are also many reasons that support that the oppositions gave the reasons why this Keystone XL Pipeline will be a problem to society. A lot of people opposite this idea of building the Keystone XL pipeline, because they consider this pipeline will not create as many jobs as it is promised. “Energy and Commerce Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) went as far as to argue that pipeline jobs are not "real jobs" - a stance that several labor unions representing millions of American workers might be surprised to hear. After all, organized labor has lined up in support of this pipeline because of the jobs it would provide for union workers” (Energy).…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Americans have come together in support of the Tribe asking for a fair, balanced and lawful pipeline process. The environmental impact statement was wrongfully terminated. This pipeline was unfairly rerouted across our treaty lands. The Trump administration — yet again — is poised to set a precedent that defies the law and the will of Americans and our allies around the…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi once said, “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man 's needs, but not every man 's greed”. People in this world, even to this very day still yearn for anything they want and perform actions in order to achieve their goals. There have been several instances where we have failed to take time and think about the consequences and impacts our actions could have on society. For the past few years, Canada and the United States have started to build a pipeline that travels through both countries. This pipeline known as the Keystone Pipeline and it carries petroleum across the country.…

    • 2082 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is one of the most controversial policy issues in the last few years. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on not only physical pipeline building but also on lobbyist movements to either approve or vote down the proposed pipeline. With potentially massive environmental effects looming, the battle between an environmentally conscious president and an opposing Congress has grown into an international dispute. Legislation for the pipeline was first introduced in 2008 when TransCanada “began construction the Keystone Pipeline after the United States issued a Presidential Permit authorizing the construction, maintenance, of the pipeline along the border of the United States and Canada” (O’Rourke) Despite Canadian…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There have been public outcries across the nation in opposition to the pipeline because it presumably will be detrimental to Canada in terms as a whole, but further…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Regardless of whether other oil sands transport options move ahead, approval of Keystone XL will lead to substantial expansion of oil sands production and therefore an increase in global greenhouse gas emissions (Lemphers).” The emissions created from refining the tar sands oil is linked to increased smog and acid rain in local refining areas (Friends of the Earth). Emissions that increase global greenhouse gasses are also bad for the environment due to the fact that they can be linked to global warming (Cappiello). With these known long term effects as possibilities, should we continue to destroy our earth? The development of these dirty, tar sands oil requires innovation in technological and environmental fields to efficiently and fiscally provide a positive result (University of Texas at Austin 29).…

    • 1549 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ken Winston, a member of the Nebraskan Sierra Club—an environmental group—boldly opposes the pipeline stating it will be one of the most, “environmentally destructive activities on the planet”(as cited in Sachs, 2014). This statement shows that environmentalists have no desire in seeing the pipeline built. They also have concern regarding the use of the pipeline—if it is built. A major concern is that “TransCanada forecasted the pipeline would leak no more than 1.4 times a decade. In reality, it spilled 14 times in its first year alone”(Wieners, 2014).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This opened doors to the insecurities of the Canada- U.S. relationship as well as questioned the rhetoric of the energy policy of the United States (Kalen 5). Many people were torn as to whether the risk of the pipeline would outweigh its potential benefits. There were concerns of the environment as well as the effect on gas prices (Terry 61-62). The advocates of this pipeline suggested it would secure borders as well as benefit the economy immensely (Slade 28). Although the pipeline would represent just a small portion of the 2.6 million miles of oil pipelines that currently exist, many have aggressively debated this topic for an extensive amount of time (“Keystone” 1).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline is a Legitimate Issue and Should Not Be Approved The controversy surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal steams from very legitimate concerns. While the issue has attracted support from some parties, it is apparent that many, including environmental activists, civilians and politician have strongly opposed the move, but the big question is, what are the specific reasons is in all this? According to Natural Resource Defense Council, NADR a New York based natural environment gives a comprehensive account why the move will be disastrous not only to natural environment but also to people (NADR). In addition, other non- partisan organizations like the Friends of Earth have also voiced their opposition to…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Quebec Separatist Movement

    • 1542 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Regardless of what you think of Canada, there is simply no denying that Quebec has a very deep and rich history that has forged the country to what it is today. With that being said, French Canadians and Quebecers alike play a huge role in the history and development of Canada. Quebec would not be the same without Canada, and Canada would not be the same without Quebec. This is why the separatist movement is not only a threat to Canada, but to Quebec itself. The separatist movement in Quebec will not succeed because they are losing supporters, have a culture that is tied too well with Canada, will struggle to survive as an independent country, and a separation will cause geographical and economic issues.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Keystone XL Pipeline is the proposed last segment of the greater Keystone Pipeline project owned by TransCanada which would run from Hardisty, Alberta (in Canada) to Steele City, Nebraska. The proposed pipeline would carry oil sands from Canada to refineries on the Gulf Coast (Cama and Wilson 14).This pipeline would utilize a bitumen-harvesting process which is more environmentally damaging and less efficient than the tradition oil drilling process. Additionally, the pipeline has been controversial due to the environmental hazards tin its operation (Issitt). One of the major groups of protestors to the Keystone Pipeline are Native American Tribes including the Northern Arapaho Tribe, Yankton Sioux Tribe, and Blackfeet tribe. Their feelings…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is an oil pipeline system that reside in Canada and the US. It runs under the land of about six tribes. The tribes that the oil pipeline runs through claim that the US has failed to inform them of what they were going to do, being that that land is theirs. The government is mistreating the Native Americans by taking their natural resources that they rightfully own.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arctic Ocean Strategy

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Not only does it possibly lead to our country gaining economic value, but it also gives the government reason to implement the Northern Strategy. The Northern Strategy focuses on multiple things, such as the sociological and economic development, protection of the Arctic environment, and our sovereignty (Canada’s Northern Strategy, 2009). The Northern Strategy is important because of multiple issues, one being with the Northwest Passage. Because some countries believe the Northwest Passage can be used as a “strait used for international navigation”(CBC News, 2009), Canada could lose absolute sovereignty (CBC News, 2009). If the Northwest Passage is declared international waters, the pollution from the increased naval traffic could damage the already fragile ecosystem of the Arctic.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays