Tragedy And The Common Man Analysis

In Tragedy and the Common Man by Arthur Miller, Miller argues that the classifications of a tragic hero need to be modernized due to the fact that common folk are capable of tragedy. Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero states that in order to be classified as such one must be higher than ordinary moral worth. Miller, however argues that common folk are as or more capable of tragedy than those of high rank and has a vastly different definition to Aristotle of whom a tragic hero should be. Throughout his essay, Miller defines the classifications which he believes a tragic hero should possess. Miller believes that in order to classify as a tragic hero one must have the obligation to defend their dignity at all costs. Similarly, the character …show more content…
The predominant device being the use of logos or an appeal to logic. Miller uses logos in multiple instances not only to justify his argument but also to prove his credibility. An example of this would be in paragraph --- when Miller states that everyone, no matter their rank, can be classified as a tragic hero because everybody experiences tragedy. By saying this Miller presents a valid point to justify why his statement, that common men should be classified as tragic heroes, should be considered. His argument, that everybody experiences tragedy, expresses a common rationale truth and therefore constitutes an example of logos. Another example of logos is shown in paragraph --- when Miller states that it is inconceivable that anyone can truly be perfect and pure. In this statement Miller argues that no one person can truly be perfect, meaning high ranking and common folk alike are both imperfect beings. By stating this, Miller once again supports his statement that common folk are as capable of tragedy as those of higher rank are. His argument, that one can not be utterly pure, also appeals to a truth which is commonly accepted by many worldwide therefore constituting it as an example of logos. Miller’s use of logos helps to prove the credibility of his article seeing as he is using logic and reason to defend his argument. By using logos Miller presents ideas which can not be argued, seeing as they are factual. The logical ideas expressed provide examples of common truths which causes Miller’s essay to be seen as credible because he is only stating accurate ideas and