The ethics of the Toyota Airbag deployment failure case
Dr. Byron Newberry, Professor.
Niranjan Nenavath
ID: 1521963
Oklahoma Christian University
In this research paper, which explores the effects of the Toyota airbag deployment failure in the past a few decades and how the Toyota ethically followed its regulations to protect its huge reputations and recalled for replacement for its vehicles airbag deployment failures. The Toyota made a profit of its brand reputation but not much concerned about their client safety and its vehicles performance at all and then this shows they never work with ethics. There are many issues in different parts of the Toyota vehicles and here we go with airbag deployment failure case with an example.
Toyota has …show more content…
In a current example, in October of 2010, Andrew Mitchell posted a video on YouTube demonstrating photos of an accident he had in his Toyota Yaris and clarified how the accident was sufficiently terrible were his car spun around once and the air bag never went off in this severe accident. This raised a large amount of controversy. There was a large response to this video of people saying that they have had comparable issues in their own mishaps with the Yaris. In response to the video, Toyota made allegations to the couple who made the video that they messed with the vehicle to make the crash look more terrible than what it was. Toyota asserted that they were attempting to possible gain money through fraud, …show more content…
profit wise, In the event that they were to announce a recall for the Yaris they would have lost a large sum of money from doing as such in turn harming their business significantly. Additionally, by doing the recall, it wouldn't insure keeping the clients who are vexed so a maverick would think they made the correct decision Under Utilitarianism Toyota would have made the wrong decision in my own opinion rather than what Michael Smola had composed, this is on the grounds that under Utilitarianism you want to make the most people happy as possible. In the case, where people were griping of the vehicle's airbags not working amid mishaps Toyota ought to have taken action and rather than simply disregarding and forgetting about the grievances as false and of their purchasers needing money. They ought to have run tests to see if there was a problem. This would have expanded happiness among Toyota clients since this would have· demonstrated that Toyota thinks about assisting the clients and that they are not simply utilizing them for money. Despite the fact that you could argue this
Dr. Byron Newberry, Professor.
Niranjan Nenavath
ID: 1521963
Oklahoma Christian University
In this research paper, which explores the effects of the Toyota airbag deployment failure in the past a few decades and how the Toyota ethically followed its regulations to protect its huge reputations and recalled for replacement for its vehicles airbag deployment failures. The Toyota made a profit of its brand reputation but not much concerned about their client safety and its vehicles performance at all and then this shows they never work with ethics. There are many issues in different parts of the Toyota vehicles and here we go with airbag deployment failure case with an example.
Toyota has …show more content…
In a current example, in October of 2010, Andrew Mitchell posted a video on YouTube demonstrating photos of an accident he had in his Toyota Yaris and clarified how the accident was sufficiently terrible were his car spun around once and the air bag never went off in this severe accident. This raised a large amount of controversy. There was a large response to this video of people saying that they have had comparable issues in their own mishaps with the Yaris. In response to the video, Toyota made allegations to the couple who made the video that they messed with the vehicle to make the crash look more terrible than what it was. Toyota asserted that they were attempting to possible gain money through fraud, …show more content…
profit wise, In the event that they were to announce a recall for the Yaris they would have lost a large sum of money from doing as such in turn harming their business significantly. Additionally, by doing the recall, it wouldn't insure keeping the clients who are vexed so a maverick would think they made the correct decision Under Utilitarianism Toyota would have made the wrong decision in my own opinion rather than what Michael Smola had composed, this is on the grounds that under Utilitarianism you want to make the most people happy as possible. In the case, where people were griping of the vehicle's airbags not working amid mishaps Toyota ought to have taken action and rather than simply disregarding and forgetting about the grievances as false and of their purchasers needing money. They ought to have run tests to see if there was a problem. This would have expanded happiness among Toyota clients since this would have· demonstrated that Toyota thinks about assisting the clients and that they are not simply utilizing them for money. Despite the fact that you could argue this