Totality And Infinity Analysis

Improved Essays
The Totality and Infinity
In Totality and Infinity, Levinas started his discussion of morality with its opposite. Levinas Stated: “Everyone will readily agree that it is the highest importance to know whether we are duped by morality. Does not lucidity, the minds opened upon the true, consist in catching sight of the permanent possibility of War” and also “War renders morality derisory” War is that which is opposite of morality and so, Levinas holds that one must understand war to know morality.
War for Levinas, is a totality. Totality came from “Totalitarianism” or “Total War”. War is an example of this totality, it “establishes an order from no one can keep his distance; nothing henceforth is exterior. War does not manifest exteriority
…show more content…
Levinas opposes this view with a different kind of eschatology which “institutes a relation with being beyond the totality or beyond history” . Eschatology here is defined by Levinas as “a relation with a surplus always exterior to …show more content…
Infinity for Levinas is surpassing a limit; this limit is that of the same, which can only be achieved through the presence of the other as other, though it is in me yet it transcends this immanence.
Action and Intention for Levinas presupposes infinity. Action is a product of the surplus of the incarnated consciousness, this surplus moves the subject and this action passes thru the “barrier of immanence” thus infinity.
While intention is a directing of mind towards anything, it “presupposes the idea of infinity this intending is towards the other that will inevitably exceed the intended intention. And if so it intends something which is not itself, it reaches out to the intended object, and it basically involves ab excess which is in the relation with the other.
For Levinas, In morality, exteriority is maintained and the other remained as the other. The moral realm “proceed(s) from the experience of totality back to a situation where totality breaks up, a situation that conditions the totality itself, such situation is the gleam of exteriority or of transcendence in the face of the Other”
The Ego
For Levinas, An ego is the one who lives in the world, and the objects in it are its Enjoyment, it’s not true that it’s moved by need. The ego is moved by

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This is regularly understood as meaning that war is by one means or another a "levelheaded" wonder and Clausewitz is sentenced pushing the fall back on war as a normal expansion of one-sided state strategy. Actually, the decision of interpretation for Politik "strategy" or "legislative issues," demonstrates varying accents with respect to the interpreter, for the two ideas are entirely different. "Policy" might be described as levelheaded activity, keeping in mind the end goal to keep up and boost that power. Governmental issues, is basically the procedure by which power is carried inside a given society. War is a loss of not a substitute for legislative issues.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most natural way to justify a belief is by producing a justificatory argument: belief A is justified by citing some other belief B, from which A is inferable. This question can then be iterated – the answer to the original question will be subject to the further question: how do you know that. Thus, any explanation or chain of justifying reasons either stops, or does not. If our explanations do not come to an end, they carry on forever, either in the form of an infinite regress, or in that of a circle. Alternatively, if our explanations come to an end, then they end either with a belief that is not justified, or with a belief that is justified, but not inferentially.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hume believed that since each idea is distinct and separable from every other, there is no self-evident relation and that these connections can only be derived from our experience of similar cases. Hence, the reason he presumed that causal reasoning can never be justified rationally. He stated that in order to learn we must suppose that our past experiences bear some relevance to present and future cases. Although many believe that the future will be like the past, Hume says the truth of that belief is not self-evident. He proposes that it is always possible for nature to change, so inferences from past to future are never rationally certain.…

    • 1969 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, he rejects the notion of things existing unperceived. He demands that something must be perceived to be regarded as existing and contends that something which is not should be declared as…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Virtue is a contingency, but we have the freedom to choose. That freedom or its existence is 'necessary ', and not 'contingent ' . Free-choice means that a 'connection ' between 'identity ' and 'non-identity/contingency ' exists in 'consciousness '. Thought and sensory action come together in our freely chosen movements/actions. Further, the 'necessity ' of free-choice shares the metaphysical status of this 'god ' for Kant.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There may be an attribute of God’s that makes his existence necessary that we simply are unaware of and cannot dismiss. The last opposing argument Cleanthes presents is him objecting that “it is absurd to seek a cause for an external succession.” This is because if we are seeking for a cause for an infinite causal chain, than we are assuming there was a cause for the external succession. If we assume there is a cause, there must have been a cause for that one as well, which cannot be possible seeing as the chain is already infinite and there was no beginning. Therefore, a causal chain simply cannot have a cause. The final argument opposing Demea’s cosmological argument is Cleanthes saying that the parts not need represent its whole.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Assess the Athenians’ argument and actions from the standpoint of pacifism and just war theory. Which position do you find most compelling, and why? Just War theory portrays a practical look at the morality of war in comparison to pacifism, allowing the opportunity to form international procedures and protocol in an attempt to control conflict. During The Peloponnesian War the Athenians offered a valid and in-depth argument on their views of justice in war, over time this has developed into many different perspectives on the place of war in international politics, most noticeably pacifism and just war theory. Pacifism follows the standpoint that all forms of war-making, under every circumstance, is both illegitimate and unjust.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Joseph Nye’s consequentialist point of view opposes Schelling’s irrationality, writing; “moral reasoning about nuclear weapons must pay primary attention to consequences.” Schelling’s Brinkmanship model aims to push the enemy as close to the nuclear brink as possible. By not paying primary attention to the consequences of nuclear deterrence, Schelling advocates risking MAD, which is morally unacceptable. This in turn reinforces that deterrence is not necessarily morally acceptable by default, but it must be tailored in such a fashion that moral acceptability is the primary concern. This can only be achieved if self-imposed restraints are effectively…

    • 2105 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While this might be true, it takes away from the chief purpose of war, which is to defeat one’s enemies. And why then, do we engage in the ugliness of war? Well, Mr. Codevilla proclaims, it is to establish peace. Ultimately, wars decide peace. He writes, “Peace and war are two sides of the same human coin.…

    • 2297 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The first is the authority of the sovereign on whose command war is waged.” 2. “A just cause is required.” 3. “The right intention of those waging war is required, that is, they must intend to promote the good and to avoid evil.” (Encounters, pg. 110-11). The first point Aquinas talks about basically means that an individual can just go about what he or she feels like doing to start something.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays