Hassaballa's Argument On Terrorism

Superior Essays
When it comes to the topic of torture most of us will readily agree that it is morally wrong. Where this agreement usually ends however is on the question of terrorism. Whereas some are convinced that torture tactics should be used on a terrorist to gain valuable information, others maintain that false information can be received. In my own view, torture interrogation tactics should be considered when dealing with a terrorist threat because a terrorist performs acts of violence to achieve a specific political aim. A terrorist will put innocent lives in danger to achieve his political aim. Terrorism is not new and even though it has been used since the early times of recorded history, it can be relatively hard to define. It has been described …show more content…
According to Hesham Hassaballa, “It is immoral to torture another human being, no matter how depraved and criminal; that we are America, and we truly do not torture those in our custody” (Hassaballa). The essence of Hassaballa argument is that we cannot betray our principles as a nation and torture those in our custody. By focusing on the pros of torture research, Hassaballa overlooks the issues with terrorism which can validate the use of torture. There can be scenarios where the use of torture can be validated due to uncooperative terrorist detainees who do not want to disclose information on their plans of terrorist …show more content…
According to Alan Dershowitz, “Every democracy confronted with a genuine choice of evils between allowing many of its citizens to be killed by terrorists, or employing some forms of torture to prevent such multiple deaths, will option for the use of torture.” In other words, Dershowitz believes if thousands of innocent lives are at risk because of a terrorist then torture tactics should be used against the suspect. It may seem cruel but torture tactics can get the truth out of the terrorist and therefore save all the lives that were in danger. Saving lives has a higher value then avoiding infliction of pain, especially where the lives are innocent and when the pain would be inflicted on guilty

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Anne Applebaum states in “The Torture Myth”, that America has operated under the false pretense that torture is a viable option for obtaining information, and because terrorists are malicious, so America needs more aggression to win. She argues that torture hurts the country more than it benefits. Torture…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jessica Wolfendale discusses what permitting torture would involve realistically in her work Training Torturers: A Critique of the “Ticking Bomb” Argument. The hypothetical ticking bomb argument fails to distinguish a justification of the general practice and individual instances of torture. She refers to the discussion as “a new war in which moral constraints do not apply”, for to allow torture is to allow the training of torturers. Historically they have been chosen for obedience, trustworthiness, political beliefs, and endurance of pain. Torturers would have to be trained in interrogational torture.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cathy Young, in the article How Much Torture is OK, makes a very valid point when talking about torture. She believes if some torture is considered to be OK all torture will be considered OK. To be more specific, if they make exceptions for some circumstances, then it’ll be hard to justify between what is right and wrong. She also mentioned that the ticking time bomb situation was highly improbable. Young is a pragmatist, she understands that there is no right answer to the situation but in this case she wants to preserve America's core…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of torture was very prominent in finding Bin Laden but yielded little to no already known information. Although the film Zero Dark Thirty provides a captivating overview of the capture of Bin Laden, it is falsely represented to give viewers an inaccurate perspective surrounding the use of torture. To comprehend what most of the torture victims endured, it is important to understand what classifies as torture. According to Article 1 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment torture can be classified as, "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article “A Case for Torture,” Michael Levin makes the erroneous claim that torture is permissible because he does not address the countless legal issues connected to the controversy. Instead of choosing to include verifiable facts that disprove the legitimacy of torture, Levin manipulates his readers’ emotions through the use of pathos, the fabrication of improbable tragedies, and unsourced studies. Levin’s “A Case for Torture” is purposely flawed in hopes of convincing his audience to join him in advocating for…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nowadays, war, an event that could possibly lead to the critic loss can exist every second as there are several conflicts happening in our world currently. Thus, if there are means that can prevent them in some way that caused less loss, it should be done immediately, including torture. To be more specific, according to the World’s leading journal, ‘The Times’, also revealed that torture has been practicing widely by CIA in order to gain information from the suspected but media just try to avoid using the terms of ‘torture’ and using the words like ‘harsh or brutal interrogation methods’ instead due to the basis of legal disputes surrounding the word torture. To give the evidence to the previous statement, Obama, the President of the United States also admitted to media in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks that “We crossed a line. That needs to be understood and accepted...…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The idea of torture can scare many people. In today’s world torture is now viewed as a thing of the past; a solution to our ancestor’s problems. Yet in reality, the dilemma whether torture should be used or not is still an issue. Many people would automatically say torture should not be allowed, until they are told millions of lives depend on it. Michael Levin is the person that made many readers second guess their answer to that simple, yet difficult question.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Evolution Of Terrorism

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Terrorism is a very serious and extremely common crime in the world today. The evolution of terrorism is very complex, however in the beginning of the twentieth century the most often used method was assasination. Since then, terrorists have displayed much more significant threats and acts of terrorism on different parts of the world. Terrorism is generally defined as the unlawful use of force against persons or property in order to intimidate the government, frighten the civilian population, or coerce a segment of the public to surrender to political and social demands. (Karmen, A.)…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics