Essay On Duty To Torture

Great Essays
To torture or not to torture, that is the question. Should we torture a prisoner who does some heinous crime, or should we not torture and find some other means to get the information we need, or as punishment for the crime. This is a pertinent question, especially with the current course cases attempting to forbid execution, on the grounds that it is torture. When one begins to consider this question philosophically, four views come to mind, which are: utilitarianism, Christian-principle based ethics, Kantian duty-based ethics, and virtue ethics.
For the utilitarianist, they see ethics as providing the maximum good for the most people. In other words, if I have a person who is threatening an attack on civilians, and he is refusing to talk about the plan, I have several options. The first being, I could
…show more content…
In this view, one must hold that they have a duty to do good. In other words, “Nor is it enough to act just in accordance with duty; we must act out of regard for duty and respect for moral law.” So in the view of the prisoner, we can torture or not torture. So we must ask “is it our duty to torture, and does torture respect for moral law?” It could possibly be our duty to torture, only if it is advocated by moral law. Now what is moral law? Moral law is designated from moral principles, which are held universal. These principles are derived from natural law. Natural law is the rational laws which govern the universe. Now where is natural law derived from? One can claim from God, since the Bible in the very least can be called a book of morals. In which all persons are held equal before the law and treated as such, and with dignity as being humans. For one person to be tortured all people of the same crime must be tortured. Also, during the torture one must not strip man of his dignity, thereby, the Kantian would not torture and seek a different solution as the Christian-principle based ethicist

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The best Way to Deal with Terrorists Is it really necessary to torture or make people suffer just to get stuff that we need from them? After reading “The Case for Torture” by Dr. Michael Levin, I disagree with torturing terrorists to gain information. I am totally against with torture or punish terrorists because first, most terrorists are forced to act in the way they do, they have no power over their actions. Secondly, it is possible to transform the bad feelings inside them to a good one, I believe everyone deserves a second chance.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    America should have torture as a form of punishment. Less crimes would be committed. As for this, with this knowledge being known, crimes such as first degree murder, rape, ect. & instead of shedding the mercy of death to a person who committed such terrible acts, we should rain the misery of life & with this knowledge at hand along with knowledge that this isn’t some threats of barks would bring fear to the sins that make us fear them.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is now easier to justify in the context of the war on terror. Many opinions may arise when looking at whether or not we should torture potential terrorists and since there is not an actual strategy to proceed along when looking at it, the question still remains unanswered. The debate began after the incident in 9/11 had occurred and the government implemented several anti terrorism measures where justification was placed under the veil of Unitarianism. In the article “The torture debate” by Phillip Rumney and Martin O’Boyle they provide readers with complementary views on whether or not legalized systems of torture would be worth having. The authors also emphasize the issues that could result from having a torture of system since it could come with many implications.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whereas Kant’s view on torture is more rigid, his belief emphasized the importance of basing any act of torture on the morality of it. He would say the decision to commit an act of torture should be made without emotion and with moral…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hundreds of years later several countries have signed the “Convention Against Torture” in agreement that torture will not be practiced in their country. As the world had progressed, torture has significantly reduced, however, the concept of torture being wrong and unjust originated several hundred years ago during the…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout human history, torture has been used to methodically obtain information by inflicting psychological or physical pain on an individual. The practice of torture has been prohibited under The United Nation’s Declaration of Human Rights, which has been sanctioned by 155 nations (The United Nations, 1984). Nevertheless, the United States has ratified the use of torture as recently as 2008. The Bush administration allowed the use of torture methods in interrogations of individuals connected to the September 11th attacks and al-Qaeda. The United States was not the only nation that disobeyed the United Nation’s demand for a cease of torture tactics; countries such as England, France, India, and Russia have all turned to torture in order…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the act-utilitarian argument for torture in ticking bomb scenarios correct? Act-Utilitarianism is the rightness of actions depending entirely on how they impact welfare or happiness. In which, the decision will be attempting to maximize both welfare and happiness. Utilitarianism sees no action as bad in itself because morality is decided by the consequences of actions. The “right thing to do” of saving the innocent is necessary to be compared and evaluated against the bad.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two wrongs don’t make a right, how can you morally solve a problem is there is no ethically correct answer. Torture is a problem from hell, sometimes you have to choose the lesser of two evils. BBC conducted a survey in 2006 about the use of torture. The survey included over 27,000 people from 25 different countries. The majority of the population agreed that torture in prisons should not be allowed; it is immoral and it weakens human right standards.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical Use Of Torture

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Torture is legal for two main reasons. The first reason is The Bush Administration was able to use the method of torture because they proved that it was enhanced interrogation. They did not call it torture. They are exactly the same because of the methods that are used. 15 out of the 18 techniques were allowed to be used by the Bush Administration, in 2002, on prisoners.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture: An Ethical Debate

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Torture has been the focus of ethical debate for quite some time. Many people have very different, opposing thoughts on whether it is alright to torture somebody or not. Whether it be torturing for information to save lives or punishment, the morals of have been discussed. Two schools of thought with differing views would be Human Rights advocates and the Consequentialists. A Human Rights advocate would suggest that torture is a cruel, unreliable method for retrieving information while a Consequentialist would likely believe torture to be acceptable if it benefits more people than it harms.…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture has been illegal since the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was signed in 1948 by members of the United Nation, including the U.S., as way of protecting the rights and dignity of the people. Yet under congressional or executive orders done in secrecy, the government may use torture as long as it be argued as a necessity. The phrase “enhanced interrogation techniques” have become the euphemism for the for the United States government’s methodical use of torture by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) during interrogations of detainees, persons held in custody. This is a topic that has not been in the center of the media’s attention since President Barack Obama has taken office. It is a forgotten topic that must be brought back…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Origin Of Torture

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The origin of torture dates back to 530 A.D. when the Romans used interrogated slaves and lower-class citizens. Today, there are international and domestic laws against the use of torture during interrogations. The United Nations Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment defines torture as “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession. ” Torture is administered as a set of abuses in an environment that causes the emotions of surprise and fear, and extinguishes any sense of escape, resistance, and relief.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Torture Necessary

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Most people don’t see torture methods being carried out unless watching terrorists or criminals being punished on television. These characters are seen being tortured because people feel as though they are getting justice if they cause harm to them while receiving information. Many people around the world, such as the CIA and other Intelligence Agencies feel that torture methods are sometimes necessary, however; that is not always the case. People across the country think that torturing someone is never necessary no matter the circumstances. When interrogating someone, torture methods should never be considered because it violates certain human rights, it is often times ineffective, and the interrogator may be considered as a cruel person.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Right To Torture

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I will torture you if I have to. Throughout human history, human always tortured each other. As long as torture is one of the most efficient, convenient and reliable way, there will be tortures in the future no matter how ethics and moral develops. For those who think torture is barbaric, and must not be acceptable, next few paragraphs will clearly show why torture must be acceptable. Torture is one of the easiest, convenient and fastest ways to get Intel.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics