Torture In Canada Research Paper

Improved Essays
The entertainment industry is constantly changing our perception of who we are, and our cultural trends. Due to shows such as 24, we have been led to believe that torture either saves thousands of innocents, or often leads to the arrest of dangerous criminals. These scenarios are being justified by using a ticking time bomb scenario, in which there is a limited amount of time before a bomb goes off. The truth of the matter is that these “ticking time bomb” scenarios are a myth, and almost never actually occur. Under the Canadian constitution and international law, using torture or enhanced interrogative techniques is illegal. This means that Canadian authorities can never participate in torture, and that Canada must never be complicit in torture committed abroad. Despite torture being illegal, Canada has been guilty in handing prisoners over to …show more content…
It shows us that we cannot blindly state that one opinion is right, and that we need to look at both sides of the issue before making a decision. We also need to clearly define what is considered as torture, since what is considered torture in one country is not torture in another. The second article shows us that Canada is just as guilty in the use of torture as any other country. Despite torture being illegal, we have broken laws for the sake of national security. Canada uses extraordinary rendition to send detainees to foreign countries in order to get interrogated, and the information gleaned from the prisoners is sent back to be used. Together, these two articles prove to us that Canada has been complicit in torture, and that it is important to come to a conclusion about what is considered torture. Articles such as this will be helpful with literature review, because they teach us how to convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Introducing the author Daniel J. Hill, he made good points on views of torture on how it could be permissible and not permissible. He introduced different scenarios on how to look at torture and was very interesting. One view he gave was a “defense case” that expressed that the officer spots a terrorist who plans to detonate a bomb that could risk lives of many. The officer made the choice to tase the terrorist just enough to paralyze him from making the bomb go off. Another case was the “interrogation case” that speaks about a terrorist planting a bomb somewhere and security services using electric shocks to get the terrorist to speak on the whereabouts of the bomb.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary: The Term Torture

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The term “Torture” derives from the Latin word “tortus” meaning “twisted. Torture involves the intentional infliction of physical or mental pain on a person to fulfill some desire of the perpetrator or to compel some action from the victim. The following are some general definitions of torture. 1. Torture is the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The government is known to do controversial actions when it comes to interrogation. The most controversial tactic is torture treatment. Torture treatment has always been around, but there have always been issues with it. The main issue is, is it constitutional? The eighth amendment states that no one is subject to cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Maher Arar Case Summary

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maher Arar sued the US for mistreatment but the case was blocked in February 2006 by Judge David Trager. His ruling states that rendition cases like these raise inappropriate foreign policy questions for court review. This runs counter to a pair of rulings made in 2004 by the US supreme Court that shows that government actions are not exempted from court review. Canada’s response to this was giving Maher Arar millions in compensation and an apology for giving false information of being an extremist to the U.S When asked about the Extraordinary Rendition program Arar said “They are outsourcing torture because they know it’s illegal ” he said. Followed by him saying “Why, if they have suspicions, don’t they question people within the boundary of the law”.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torturing suspects or criminals is a very hot issue in the United States. There are many arguments between should the US officials torture terrorists when interrogating them. Michael Levin says he agrees on torturing terrorists for information in his essay, “The Case for Torture”. He addresses his arguments by giving a few hypothetical scenarios of terrorist attacks. One of the examples is, when there is an atomic bomb in Manhattan which is going to explode very soon, the US got the guy who planted it and need to get the location of the bomb and method to disarm it.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The world soon joined the United Sates, and the end of World War II saw the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in the 1980’s the United Nations adopted a detailed treaty on torture in peacetime. This left for a long standing terms of absolutely no torturing of any individual. However all of the decades of laws, and all of the championing of the United States against torture came crashing down in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Following the September 11 terrorist attacks within the year the United States executive branch was using torture to gain information. This was against every single law because the United States and never officially declared war.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Strained positions for long hours, sleep deprivation and waterboarding, with the occasional punch or slap, may sound worth it in order to save thousands of innocent Americans lives from the ongoing war of terror. It is a known fact that the American government used the term “enhanced interrogation” loosely in order to cover up their questionable actions to get any little piece of information about any terrorist motives with torture. Enhanced interrogation has been described as systematic torture in order to obtain potential terrorist information. Even though the CIA get their information, the process behind on how they got it always remains confidential only for the government. Because of the confidentiality this causes a problem to the public and foreign relations.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Bowden Torture

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is a thin line between torture, coercion, and persuasion. For some countries, torture is an adequate form of punishment used to not only instill fear, but to also show the consequences of prohibited actions to others. However, for the United States and other countries who have signed the Geneva Convention, torture is strictly prohibited, but is still practiced in different forms. The article “The Dark Art of Interrogation,” written by Mark Bowden, explores various interrogation techniques used throughout the War on Terror by the United States Military, the Israeli government, and the New York City Police force. Each of the agencies consistently agreed that using “hard torture” was “the classic shortcut for a lazy or incompetent investigator”(…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title The Inhumanity of Solitary Confinement. Research Question and Argument Is the use of solitary confinement in Canadian corrections an inhumane way to punish offenders? In this paper, I will argue that having inmates endure the cruelty of solitary confinement for extended periods of time, is an inhumane approach to punishing, and causes harm, rather than reform the offender. Research Direction…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Torture Debate Analysis

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Torture is now easier to justify in the context of the war on terror. Many opinions may arise when looking at whether or not we should torture potential terrorists and since there is not an actual strategy to proceed along when looking at it, the question still remains unanswered. The debate began after the incident in 9/11 had occurred and the government implemented several anti terrorism measures where justification was placed under the veil of Unitarianism. In the article “The torture debate” by Phillip Rumney and Martin O’Boyle they provide readers with complementary views on whether or not legalized systems of torture would be worth having. The authors also emphasize the issues that could result from having a torture of system since it could come with many implications.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I defend the nature of the balance of civil liberties, rights and torture by drawing upon Jeremy Waldron, Henry Shue and Jeff McMahan’s view on the morality of torture. Torture is the act of deliberately inflicting severe physical or psychological pain to an individual who is restrained and defenseless. Reasons for torture can include punishment, revenge, political re-education, deterrence, interrogation or coercion of the victim or a third party, or simply the sadistic gratification of those carrying out or observing the torture. In this paper I will argue that torture is not morally justified; torture ought not to be legalized or otherwise institutionalized even in the ticking time bomb scenario because the rights of the innocent…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Sex-Work; a way of living” Sex trafficking, an epidemic in its most latent manner, effects the morals and rights of freedom and protection of society. In 2014, Bill C-36 under Canada’s Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act, received its assent of legalization. The Parliament Members of Canada have grave concerns about the exploitation, objectification, risks of violence and the disproportionate impact on women and children inherent in prostitution (PCEPA 2014). Although the legislation passed by the Canadian parliament initially intents to tackle the issues of human trafficking and their exploitation, however it fails to put into perspective the actual stakeholders being effected by Bill C-36. It mistakenly assumes sex-work as…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin’s hypothetical leads to the illogical “A Case For Torture” is an essay written by Michael Levin in which he tries to make a compelling case for the use of torture as a punishment during certain situations in the United States. One of the ways Levin tries to logically prove his argument is by citing different real life situations; some examples are situations that actually occurred, but most are hypothetical situations. The use of hypothetical situations is meant to help direct the reader to understand the applications of Levin’s policy on torture. With that, Levin is not convincing in his argument as he relies too heavily on the hypothetical. Michael Levin in “A Case For Torture” is not logically convincing in his discussion as to why…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Levin also strategically uses logos to appeal to the reader’s sense of logic. Throughout the article the author discusses reasons of when torture is justified. Knowing that many Americans consider torture unconstitutional, Michael tries to reason with the audience saying, “Millions of lives outweigh constitutionality.” Even though torture is barbic, the audiences come to sense that mass murder is even more barbic. The piece makes the audience re-think their opinion torture if it means lives will be saved.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin was published in Newsweek in 1982, it has stirred up many debates regarding the universal use of torture. Levin believes that torture is justifiable in extreme cases such as preventing terrorism to save lives. Levin argues by giving examples of make-believe scenarios in which the only two options given are to either meet the demands of the terrorist or to torture the terrorist so that innocent lives can be spared; however, Levin’s argument is flawed because he never fully defines the boundaries which can be placed on the concept of torture that would ensure that the use of torture is not abused. He believes that the best way to address a problem in which one wants an immediate result…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays