Tort And Negligence Tort

Great Essays
Introduction:
Tort can be defined as a wrongful action including negligence cases and intentional wrongs which result in harm to another party (Larson, 2003). In a scenario where one party causes harm to the second party, they will have to face losses in compensation for the harm inflicted. Classifications of Tort include intentional, or unintentional negligence.
Some examples of intentional torts include fraud, defamation, offense, insult, assault or interference among others (Larson, 2003). For example, in the workplace, an employer can suffer insults or reputation loss in cases of low quality work resulting from the inefficiency, or wrong doings of an employee.
Negligent Tort refers to the circumstances where an individual is held liable, under law in the case of duty of care to another individual (Hernandez, 2010). This means that, law administrators will hold that person carrying the duty of care, and who is responsible for any harm or damage, or where any
…show more content…
Besides addressing risks and uncertainties, negligence tort also encompasses a range of causes of legal actions in cases such as personal injury, medical malpractice, and product liability grievances (Steenson, 2009).
The topic that is assigned deals with negligent tort; it will cover product subject to recall, product liability in case of a recall, cause and harm to customers and its impact. Besides that it will discuss concepts related to duty of care, the standard of care, breach of the duty of care, actual causation, proximate causation, actual injury, and defenses to negligence (Hernandez, 2010), and finally discuss consumer statute in conjunction with a product

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Work in a medical office can occasionally involve behavior that maybe conflicting to your personal ethics. You must not abuse the patient’s legal right to privacy. The medical assistant always puts the patient first if not that is considered unethical. Medical Assistants face ethical problems on a daily basis, in spite of where ethical beliefs are impacted by these factors, culture, religion, background, and individual values and beliefs. These factors form our ethical views and influence ethical decisions that affect medical assistants and their patients.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Conclusion: Strict Product Liability c. Defenses: i. Rule: Negligence 1. Definition: When a reasonable person fails to do their duty to take a certain standard of care in their circumstances. 2. Analysis: The caution tape was not clearly evident along with the above threat. 6.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Tort Law Case Study

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Sweethearts to Sour Tarts, Millionaire Matchmaker Sued The dating scene has changed dramatically over the course of a few years. With more people having access to the internet, online dating is no longer something the desperate or insecure; everybody is dating online. As more people date online, the need to weed out the bad apples from those people who are truly looking for love becomes obvious. When it comes to people who have money, they pay elite matchmakers to weed out the individuals who may not be compatible with them.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ba 207 Business Law

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It covers product design defects and whether the manufacturer to reasonable care to keep the consumer safe (782). A manufacturer should display warning defects on the products to avoid liability for injuries incurred by the purchaser. Failing to warn could be considerably costly to the manufacturer (783). The main problem with Negligence Theory does not necessarily protect the consumer, because the defenses against any claims have developed through Common-Law and Preemption (784).…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alee V. Bob’s Negligence Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed, that the duty was breached, and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages Special Duty- Land Occupier/Invitee A special duty arises in circumstances involving a land occupier. An invitee is one who enters upon the land of another with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The negligent act of Defendants towards Plaintiff’s Injuries violates the American Disabilities act, into lifting the heaviest Appliance at one of the said Defendant’s Home, being seriously injured and adding to the Plaintiff existing Disability. The Defendant’s Conduct and the environment fell below the standard of reasonable safety and care in the circumstances, when the Plaintiff was not supposed to lift…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Boyd (2015), negligence can be defined as the failure “to conform to a standard of reasonable care” (p. 202). In tort cases concerning negligence, unlike criminal cases, the culpability of the accused is not dependent on malicious intent. Instead, to establish negligence the plaintiff must present “a case that is more probable than not” (Boyd, 2015, p. 203). The cases of Annapolis County District School Board v. Marshall and Ediger v. Johnston contain disputes between various courts over the nature of negligence. In this paper, the Supreme Court 's judgements for both cases will be evaluated and it will be argued that, in both cases, their judgements provided the best interpretation of a standard of reasonable care.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Tort of Negligence: The acts leading to claims of damage or physical injury in a negligent torts are not deliberate. There are three specific elements that need necessarily be fulfilled in a claim of negligence (Legal Dictionary, 2017): - The respondent must have a duty or owe a service to the plaintiff or victim - The respondent must have miscarried that duty, or dishonored a commitment or obligation to the complainant - The accuser must have agonized a genuine cost, physical harm, or damages that were unswervingly triggered by the petitioner’s misconduct, or a failure to act…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A person can be held liable for failure “to act affirmatively” to remove potential risk. The overall duty of care placed on an individual includes not putting others at risk by allowing them to be exposed to a potentially dangerous situation.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Based on the above scenario, who is to blame, Why? Based on the scenario it seems that the construction company on campus is at fault for Unintentional Torts. Which if we look at the four elements we need to prove to succeed in a negligence action we will see that the construction company is at fault.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While I always knew there was a difference in the types of legal cases such as criminal and civil, I was not aware of Tort law. According to Lau & Johnson (2011). “A tort can be broadly defined as a civil wrong, other than breach of contract” Simply stated, a Tort is some type of civil wrong that causes harm or loss. These law suits are brought for reasons such as personal injury, consumer protection or defamation.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim Robyn Broadwater Kaplan University October 18, 2016 MEMORANDUM Date: October 18, 2016 To: Candie Cardigan, CEO, CARDWARE Inc. From: Robyn Broadwater Re: Negligence Requirements and Potential Defenses to Myra’s Claim ______________________________________________________________________________…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately classified under a primary victim. The first element is duty, whether it was owed to the plaintiff. The law acknowledges the relationship between the defendant and plaintiff, and the existing relation in turn may justify that the defendant is obliged to…

    • 1959 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence is one theory. Negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care to keep you from having an accident. Negligence cases result when someone's inaction or action causes the injury. The other theory is liability. This legal theory is when a product you have used caused the injury.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays