Argical Analysis Of Eric Schlosser Today's Nuclear Weapons

Improved Essays
Nuclear weapons have come into existence within the last decade. They have changed the way wars are fought as they could lead to the total extermination of humanity. These weapons can lead to mutual destruction of nations, which really have caused humans to reevaluate the way they conduct foreign affairs. Eric Schlosser’s article “Today’s nuclear dilemma” is about the nuclear weapons that countries control and what should be done with them. Schlosser argues that the current nuclear weapons active should be disarmed. He believes that there are too many variables in the equation of handling these weapons. He points out that no one in the world is safe with these weapons in circulation. I agree with Schlosser’s view, as nuclear weapons …show more content…
The author argues that these changes have increased the threat of nuclear weapons as Russia has lowered the threshold for using them. Schlosser then brings up an example of NATO in the cold war. NATO used a strategy to disperse tactical weapons to the frontline to deter a Soviet invasion. Schlosser then states that the authorization for firing the weapons was deregulated and thus the threat of the weapons being fired accidently rose substantially. The author ends his point of deregulation in nuclear weapons by saying that governments have tried to resolve the issue, but have not had …show more content…
Schlosser agrees with this point but he also states that since the deterrence is psychological and not physical it could not work in the future and bring about disastrous results. For example, if India and Pakistan used their nuclear weapons on each other, more that one billion people would be killed.
The next point that examined is nuclear weapons violate international law. This is true as nuclear deterrence is like holding a nation hostage. Also nuclear weapons cannot differentiate between military targets and civilians it violates the Geneva Conventions, which protect civilians. The author than talks about how the International Campaign to Ban Nuclear Weapons has convinced many countries to seek abolition of nuclear weapons and how the Treaty of the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons have been steps in the right direction.
The last point of the article is about how to undo the knowledge to create nuclear bombs. Schlosser believes that the knowledge to create these weapons can be forgotten because as time passes and when there is no nuclear testing, people will forget as they become less

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    3- According to this article, there is a nuclear war predicted to happen in the near future between the U.S. and Russia. Each one of them has nuclear weapons and tries to build bigger bombs and more accurate missiles to ensure its security. In this article, Donella Meadows illustrates that there is another solution to ensure each country’s security; it is so simple that children can come up with. The solution is that both countries have to get rid of their nuclear weapons. In order to prove that, Meadows quoted two conversations from a journal called “Nuclear Concerns and Humankind”.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear weapons should be reduced because the threat of nuclear winter and even worse risks are too extreme. One of the scariest effects of nuclear weapons is nuclear winter. Nuclear winter is when smoke from nuclear explosions gets so dense that it blocks out the sun. This would block out all of the sunlight causing the earth to turn cold, gray, and dry causing plants and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    As research continues, newer and better technologies are invented. This new technology is being used in almost all aspects of life, from day-to-day life, research, military, medical and many other fields. One such technology is the development of nuclear power. Nuclear energy is “the energy held in the nucleus of an atom; it can be obtained through two types of reactions – fission and fusion”1. Recently nuclear energy has become more important because of its various uses and applications, its effects on the environment, and based on the church’s opinions and the opinions of the military and governments, nuclear energy is an important tool that humans should continue to research and develop, but only its non-violent applications.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of nuclear energy should be a problem of national policy instead of military expediency, moreover, international control is the only effective approach towards the protection of our nation and foreign policy. Facts: If a race for nuclear armaments occurred,…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because deterrence best enforced through “coordinated multilateral pressure and tough economic sanctions,” nuclear proliferation can be discouraged without military occupation, which heightens tensions and drives nuclear development as a method of neutralizing American advantages (Mearsheimer and Walt 79; Posen 120). Although there is the possibility that some vulnerable states may seek nuclear weapons to bolster their security, it is likely to be a costly and ineffective endeavor with few actual implications in the international system (Mearsheimer and Walt 79). Offshore balancing is ultimately the better alternative to fighting “preventive conventional warfare against nascent nuclear powers,” which could quickly escalate into a second Cold War or even unintentional nuclear warfare itself (Posen…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, an argument against the view that the proliferation of nuclear weapons it’s inevitable and will eventually escalate to nuclear war, is that since 1945 there is not a single case recorded with the use of nuclear weapons. Second, by taking this pacifist’s position…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some Actions are taking place today with Nuclear threats between the U.S. and North Korea. As Ms. Hanham said in an interview from Monterey California, “The frustration I have is borne out of how casually we've started to talk about [nuclear weapons] as tools”. This is a complete different time and due to advancements, people realize bombings are effective but it has been used to fright others since it’s such a powerful resource, if it’s ever needed. However, a terrible threat toward another country should be taken seriously. It was risky to use a bomb like this if other countries had something similar it could have made thing worse but this risk was beneficial and saved the war from an unknowing future, which would have most likely been…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our modern society, there exists this culture of fear that plagues all levels of society. This infection is believed by the masses to only be cured by the notion of security. Security, however, only prompts more fear. In effort to protect our ways of life, people justify various decisions and by these justifications, the commercialization of security is deemed acceptable and has become normalized. Professor Park posits that the Control need is the source of all evil.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the book “The Making of the Atomic Bomb”, the author Richard Rhodes argues that the “Atomic Age” was almost entirely brought to being by Jewish and semitic groups. Through this extensive 800 page book, Rhodes brings up bonafide historical events, records, and interviews to compile a piece of work that not only encapsulates the emotions and ideological stirring of the time, but also the immersive science that went into the bomb that changed the world. This book doesn 't just begin with Hiroshima or Nagasaki either, but spans all the way from the Manhattan project to the end of the “Cold War Era”, and how we use nuclear energy now. In the book Rhodes begins building his argument by bringing to light one of the best known physicists of our time, and possibly all time.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission, in a fission bomb, or a combination of fission and fusion, like in a thermonuclear weapon. These weapons help make the world a more safe place, which is exactly why I believe that even though they are expensive, one Trillion Dollars over 30 years expensive, they are a necessary thing for today’s life. The production and use of nuclear weapons provide many jobs, help countries and nations be more or stay powerful, also make people not want to use them in a way. Nuclear weapons let countries maintain power or obtain power through military advantages. The weapons are weapons of mass destruction that nobody wants to mess with, causing other countries to respect the countries and nation that have these weapons.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea that those who possess power can do as they choose is not new. This idea was proven true during the Cold War in the late 1950s and 1960s. In Pat Frank’s Alas, Babylon, the Soviet Union was in deadlock with the United States for world domination. One false step by the American Air Force had disastrous repercussions for the citizens of the United States.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [5] Despite these global efforts, key states like the U.S. have adopted counterproductive policies which have hindered treaty-based efforts to control arms and effect disarmament. [6] The U.S.’s policy commonly referred to as “selective-multilateralism” has led to increased skepticism of international efforts to deter and control WMD. A separate yet more concerning U.S. policy is that of “counter-proliferation” which equates to U.S.’s use of unilateral force as its primary means in combating perceived WMD threats with or without the United Nations Security Council’s approval. [7] These U.S. policies have ignited a drive within state actors to acquire nuclear weapons in an effort to deter would be aggressors from striking; while facilitating the means for terrorists to potentially acquire nuclear weapons and/or materials. WMDs pose a clear and present danger to the U.S. and our allies; especially today in a World filled with Islamic terror groups with apocalyptic aspirations to use WMD against the U.S. and state actors proliferating nuclear materials at an unprecedented level; not observed since the Cold…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since this weaponry has the ability to increase violent terrorist attacks, it is vital for states to be aware and take caution when dealing with Iran now. Even though already true, it seems risky and terrifying that Iran has the same nuclear power as the United States (CITE pg. 3) The book Hiroshima is a strong influencer when comparing these articles’ facts and opinions because everything was put in perspective in this book. The outcome of the bomb dropped on Hiroshima was realistically described, making the event relate to any audience. The TYPEatomic bombs devastating long-term effects on the people of Hiroshima makes the thought of any country with this type of weaponry power seem…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear arms would play a vital role in the following Cold War. They were a cause of the cold war. They were a tool to threaten rival nations. And finally, they served as the deterrent that prevented the Cold War from becoming World War 3. Nuclear arms served as a cause of the Cold War.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is nuclear deterrence? According to the freedictionary.com it is the military doctrine that an enemy will be discouraged from using nuclear weapons as long as he can be destroyed as a consequence; "when two nations both resort to nuclear deterrence the consequence could be mutual destruction". In Futter’s book he says that “for nuclear deterrence to work, the nuclear-armed state must be credible in both its intention and ability to use nuclear weapons as retribution for an attack”.(Futter 71) Nuclear deterrence to some may be the reason to get rid of nuclear weapons all together. Since no one will use the weapons why have those around? This is a great question to ask, and a logical at that.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays