Tobacco Facts: Major Cigarette Companies

Improved Essays
“Tobacco Facts.” Who.int. World Health Daniel Graham
ENG 121.156
Basic Argument
October 8, 2015
Curbing The Killers Last month, the Food and Drug Administration banned R.J. Reynolds, a major cigarette company, from the selling of four brands of their cigarettes. Even though the first commercial cigarettes hit the general public in the middle of the 19th century, cigarette regulations by the FDA started in 2009. Six years later, the FDA handed down their first ban on a major tobacco company. Regulators state that R.J. Reynolds failed to disclose proper information regarding new additives. Any new additive potentially brings new dangers. This unknown variable raises a concern by the FDA, not the strength of nicotine already present in all cigarettes. Without
…show more content…
R.J. Reynolds naturally disagrees with this decision. Major cigarette companies use additives to increase the enjoyment of smoking by reducing the harshness, adding flavor, and helping optimize the delivery of nicotine. Also, certain additives not only “help” new smokers to become regular customers, but also makes it harder for existing smokers to quit, and they easily relapse. The hooks of the cigarette industry bare vicious barbs into the smoking population. Just like the mouth of a fish, the hook goes in smooth, and stays in tight. Seeing young adults and teens bite that hook saddens the heart. Even though cigarette companies have the right to free enterprise, the FDA needs to control the cigarette companies by

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Big Tobacco Case Study

    • 1537 Words
    • 6 Pages

    For the majority of the twentieth century, Big Tobacco was invincible. The cigarette industry was a national, economic behemoth, and managed to escape almost every controversy it faced unscathed. With Congress on its side, the industry managed to filter out any liabilities. After the Labelling Act of 1965, companies were ‘forced’ to place warning labels on their packaging: Cigarette Smoking May Be Hazardous To Your Health. These vague, flimsy words proved more potent than any armor against the onslaught of lawsuits that were to come (Brandt 255).…

    • 1537 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history the United States has always used tobacco products as a cash crop to help support the nation. Over time tobacco was sold to many people within the country and out of the country, it was used widely, and it brought in a lot of money/income. Soon cigarettes were created out of tobacco, becoming very popular throughout the country; not only were they very popular, but they were very addictive. Before the 1940’s no one feared the consequences of smoking cigarettes until cancerous cells began to be found within the human body. Soon after the discovery changes were made to cigarettes to deem them as a “safer” product for the public to continue to use.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cigarette Company Rule

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Pages

    1. The rule states that cigarette companies should be required to create a graphic warning label on their boxes of cigarettes and their ads. Though I do not agree with cigarettes and nor do I smoke them but I think that the rule forces a company to put bad advertising on their product which is not good for any company so I don't really like the rule and think it should be taken…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This new regulation was first noticed in 2012 when it was submitted to the office of the federal register at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/05/10/2016-10685/deeming-tobacco-products-to-be-subject-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-as-amended-by-the. The regulation passed by the FDA like any other regulation can be challenged by due process. There are two types of due process that can challenge an regulation by an administrative agency. These two types are called Procedural due process and Substantive due process. Both of these types can be useful in challenging a regulation that some feel might go too far, or feel that the regulation violates their rights.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is your personal opinion of the issues in the two cases? Tobacco companies have been at odds with the public, medical professions and insurance companies for as long as I can remember. The idea that their product is still on the market proves to me that although it may be proven to cause cancer decades ago, and full disclosure of bodily harm is presented, consumers exercise their own freedom to purchase the product. Therefore, it is my opinion tobacco companies have done their due diligence and duty of full disclosure and not to misrepresent their product. It is the responsibility of the (informed) consumer to decide whether or not to submit to the product.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Industries and associations such as the tobacco industry and NFL are known to protect their money and reputation. Any claim made against them could cause them to fall apart. When scientists claim that second hand smoking is harmful or that football players are at risk of brain damage, the tobacco industry and NFL will attempt to falsify the claims without proper evidence. The process by which the industries attempt to falsify the claims lacks in reliability and does not make clear the effects of the products to the public. Industries should be reevaluating their products to figure out whether or not the products are actually harmful.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was the U.S. Senate that passed the “Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act” on April 1, 1970, which required warnings to be labeled on cigarette packages. The labels stated that “the Surgeon General has determined that cigarette smoking is dangerous for your health.” This act was designed to limit the practice of smoking, prohibiting any form of advertisement on television or radio. There were predictions at that time that the Tobacco companies would suffer greatly, as they had flourished on these types of marketing campaigns. It was a turning point for a lot of these companies that had to rethink business models due to the market shifting with these new laws.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    British American Tobacco is the 2nd biggest transnational tobacco manufacturing company based in the UK. BAT has a large market presence in countries such as Brazil, Canada and former British colonies in Asia such as Pakistan and Australia. It also holds a 42% interest in Reynolds American (NYSE:RAI), thereby having an important amount of indirect exposure to the U.S. market. According to Business Premiere, (BAT) has established a strong market position over the years with the use of Global Drive Brands such as Dunhill, Kent, Rothmans, Lucky Strike and Pall Mall brands. Dunhill is their premium brand and sold 55 billion units in 2014.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Libertarianism On Drugs

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many progressive movements in the 21st century call for the legalization of marijuana, citing studies that claim a lack of significant harmful effects. Simultaneously, many conservative groups act adamantly to prevent such legalization, or even reclassification of the drug into a lower risk category. It is not even agreed upon that the government needs to limit what abuses we subject our own bodies to at all. Libertarians would argue that the government need not be involved with what people do with their own bodies. Yet modern society still places limits on which drugs individuals can consume, however not uniformly, and certainly not fairly.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Given the growth in revenue over the last fifteen years, I am inclined to believe that the opponents are at least partly correct – the ban seems to have been at least partially ineffective. Even with bans on advertising, and restricting smoking in public to designated areas, people continue to make the choice to smoke. Although cigarette smoking has experienced a decline in recent years, people are still smoking. Tobacco companies are diversifying into electronic cigarettes, and chewing tobacco and the profits continue to roll in. I may be a proponent of personal freedom, but my opinion is that bans are not necessarily a bad thing.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tobacco Misconceptions

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As employees of the leading cigarette producer in North America, it is imperative that the truth about our product is clarified. The harmful effects of tobacco have been greatly exaggerated and the use of our product has little or no known harmful side effects. Though many other tobacco products do have negative health or cosmetic consequences, the use of our product by many doctors and celebrities would prove otherwise. The fact that our product has been the top selling tobacco product in America consistently for the last two decades speaks volumes about the safety and quality of our tobacco as well. The proven negative health effects of tobacco in general do not apply to our product because it is of a higher quality, so please enjoy!…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smoking Vs Cigarettes

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Then in 1964 the Surgeon general of the U.S. wrote a report explaining the dangers of smoking and that the nicotine and tar in cigarettes causes lung cancer. That being brought to light led to the Cigarette labeling act passed in 1965, which made it so that every pack of cigarettes sold had to have a warning label on them advising that cigarette smoke is not good for your health. Since then tobacco companies have come out with alternatives with lower tar amounts to keep customers fears down and to keep them buying. Something that once was used for medicinal purposes was now a sign for cancer and bad health. Even after all the studies proving cigarette smoke is bad for you its still a legal purchasable substance who use has no real benefit for a…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    [Transition: Understanding why cigarettes wreak havoc on your body may help you understand the importance of stopping, let’s review those now.] I. Back in the day cigarettes were rolled from the dried tobacco harvested from local fields. Now they are manufactured in huge factories where the process includes adding different additives to the tobacco. Per M. Myers, President of the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, The evidence is sufficient to conclude that the increased risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung in smokers resulted from changes in the design and composition of cigarettes since the 1950s." and the FDA only in 2009 gained the authority to regulate what goes into…

    • 1081 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction: Smoking: A Bad Behavior That Kills Smoking kills, this has been a public knowledge since January of 1964, when the Surgeon General released the first warning of smoking on health effects. The advisory warned users that cigarettes are a cause of lung cancer and chronic bronchitis. Through the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act of 1965 and the Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act of 1969 regulations on tobacco products were implemented. These regulations required a health warning to be put on cigarette packages and banned advertisement on broadcast media, and an annual report on the effects of smoking became a requirement (CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], 2012a).…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While I understand the highly addictive and harmful effects of tobacco use, I believe in this, and every case like it, it is the responsibility of the consumer to research any item they are planning to purchase, especially if they are going to ingest it in any way. It is not the responsibility of the government in any form or fashion to make decisions on behalf of a citizen, even if it is supposedly in their best interests. It is not the government’s business what defines a citizen’s best interest. If a tobacco company is operating legally within the country and fulfills its requirements of the law or laws, the government should have no say in whether or not they can…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays