To What Extent Was Alexander The Measure Of Greatness

Improved Essays
“Your greatness is measured by your kindness,” - William J. H. Boetcker. Greatness is not something that can be measured, it is only an abstract term. It cannot even be determined by the number of people who follow you, Hitler had over 4 million and he was far from great, while some genuinely great people achieve it all on their own. However in its abstractness, greatness is only a mix of discipline, integrity, and care for others. But there is one person, who has been called “great” since ancient times. Yet Alexander was not great. He wanted people to think that he was generous, so he made a show of giving up a small part of what he had, he was shifty and second-handed to the people who were less powerful than he, and he promoted cruelty to animals, even the species of his best friend. …show more content…
But instead of reviving their parched tongues, the Macedonians gifted it to their king in a soldier’s helmet. Then Alexander pours it out, attempting to look humble. This is confirmed in the article “The Legend of the Water Helmet”, “Alexander thanked the soldier for his kindness, and then, in full view of his army, poured the water out into the hot sand.” Believers of Alexander's “greatness” will argue that he was showing that he deserved no more than his army. Well first of all, then he is a hypocrite, he is a king. He has a much cushier life than any of his soldiers. Also, there were other options besides dumping it. One would be to give it to the sick soldiers (there would almost definitely be some), give it to the oldest, best, most honorable soldier as a thank you, or give it back to the ones who found the puddle, as a prize for their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Also in source D he gave a man a talent making him very rich. In conclusion, Alexander does deserve to be called “Alexander the Great”.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This shows Alexander cared about others since he would not kill innocent people. Exceptional leaders, as well as great people would not kill innocent people. Another reason Alexander was great is found in document D. Document D states they were on a long tough journey through the desert and needed water. They found a little bit of water, but there was not enough so he poured it out because his attitude was if there is not enough water for everyone then nobody could have it. This evidence matters for the reason that it shows he cared about his soldiers and wanted to be fair and not selfish.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But besides his brilliant leadership in battle, Plutarch writes of an unselfish side to Alexander where he gives away his riches to his companions, and of having bronze statues made for fallen soldiers after a battle. (page 4) This portrays Alexander as, not only an effective leader, but one that is almost flawless. Although there are those that disagree, Plutarch’s version of Alexander most definitely deserves to be called Alexander the Great.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander The Great Cons

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great Alexander the Great was a man who had dreams and longed to pursue them. There are many ways that Alexander respected and disrespected the people in his city. Alexander respected the Egyptian beliefs, including their gods. Although he did have many cons to him being “king or ruler” of the city. He also seeked to get revenge and bring pain to the rivals in many different ways.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander used his smartness and quick-thinking skills to win battles in the heat of the moment. Once he was about to cross a river when he saw that Porus, the enemy, was directly across from him and his army, “When Alexander saw this, he [decided to] move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled” (Doc A). In like manner in a game of…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great DBQ

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also, Alexander conveyed his intelligence throughout his years as a leader. ” Alexander returned to the Persian city of Susa, where he tried to unify his huge empire by taking Darius’s daughter as his second wife and ordering officers to marry Persian women.” (Background essay) In other words, When Alexander wanted something done, he found a way to make sure it happened. In this case, Alexander…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Declaring that his conquests and rulings were all for the good of his subjects (Arrian, p. 266), Alexander proclaimed “From all this which I have labored to win for you… I have nothing of my own” (Arrian, p. 266). That calmed the mutineers. Of course, an intelligent emperor never underestimates the power of a good guilt trip. Before invading a region, Alexander appealed to area priests in an attempt to gain the people’s favor.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon: A Great Leader Being the first person to conquer the Egyptian, Greek, and Persian empires in just over a decade was no walk in the park, and neither was integrating a culture into all of those empires nor attempting to unite them all. Alexander of Macedon was this man: he conquered the greatest empires, spread the Greek influence, and lead in a unique way with his inspiring character that he is famous for. Although he was not the ideal leader such as Plato’s idea of a philosopher-king, he was an ethical man who wanted his people content. His well-known title, “Alexander the Great,” was very appropriate for him: his fine character and social goals, his unique political leadership and strategic conquering, and his economic…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander The Great Dbq

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great was not truly great because he was an inhumane leader and his empire quickly collapsed after he died. Alexander wasn’t truly great because he was inhumane to other people and seemed like a bad general, “Ferocious manhunt…30,000 in number, he sold into slavery. Two thousand men of military age were crucified”(Doc C). He obtained 2,000,000 square miles and founded 70 cities(Doc E). However, in nearly every city, Alexander would sell most of the people into slavery and kill the remaining of the people.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the great is very well known and popular for having one of the biggest empires in the ancient world. Alexander the great restored his kingdom and gained a lot of allies and friendship. Alexander also made Greek culture popular and spread the word to other cities. Alexander was very humble, and his men were very humble. Alexander's army let other conquered cities still have their own culture, while still advertising their own Greek culture upon them.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In spite of the fact that he was pulling together his boundless realm, the Macedonians felt they were losing their pioneer. He began self-love to unite his differed regions with a typical religion, yet he brought it too far with prokynesis. (Prokynesis is the demonstration of bowing before somebody) .Alexander had the general population of his realm do as such. After this, Alexander still held quite a bit of his energy, yet it would soon be detracted from…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most common belief amongst Alexander’s critics is that he was a cruel and inattentive ruler. However, historians who believe this misconception fail to acknowledge the evidence that expresses Alexander’s redeeming qualities such as good leadership and loyalty to soldiers and friends. These historians also do not realize that a crucial aspect to a great leader is to be successful, which Alexander has more than demonstrated with his triumphs and guidance over territories under his control. Alexander III is entitled to be a distinguished historical figure and has rightfully earned the dignified title “Alexander the Great” through his remarkable leadership, the substantial impact that he had over his conquered territories, and his personal consideration for others, despite the fallacy that he was…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his path to capturing much of the world he had been egotistical and self-centered. When he worked to move from place to place, Alexander expected people to obey his commands. According to the article “Alexander the Great “ For their stubborn resistance, the inhabitants of the city were slaughtered and the survivors sold into slavery.” This shows that Alexander cared very little for the people he conquered. He worked very to ruin their civilizations and their lives in general.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Homer’s epics have left an undisputable and profound influence on Western literature. However, outside of the realm of literature, Homer’s ideas about honor, kingship, and leadership continued to affect the political world hundreds of years after his death. Specifically, Homer’s impact on Alexander the Great played a central role in not only the way Alexander saw himself, but also in the way he established and ruled the largest empire on earth. From an early age, Alexander was exposed to The Iliad and The Odyssey under the instruction of his teacher, Aristotle. The parallels between Alexander and Achilles are striking; for instance, both are undoubtedly the most remarkable warriors.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays