To Kill A Mockingbird: Reverse Racism

Improved Essays
Racism, what is it? Racism is discrimination against someone because they are different. I believe that it is absolutely inadmissible to be racist to somebody. Why do I think that would be objectionable? I will answer that in a concise manner, what would Jesus do? In John 4:4-42, Jesus talked with a Samaritan woman and requested her to give him a drink. That was considered a scandalous act at that time because Jesus was a Jew. He did not care about what color of skin or acts that a person committed. He just cared about their heart. How has racism changed over time, Is reverse racism good or bad, Is it different in different cultures? These three topics will covered in this essay.

How has racism changed throughout the years? In the 1970s,
…show more content…
Reverse racism means that someone gives an advantage to, or stands up for someone someone in a minority. Should reverse racism be classified as good or bad? I think it should be both. For instance, the lack of reverse racism equals racism, that equals a bad mix. A medium amount of reverse racism is good. For example, in To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus stands up for Tom Robinson when no one else would because it was the equitable thing to do. That is the true way reverse racism should be used. To much of it, can be like when President Obama gives extra privileges to illegal immigrants and not giving the same types of prerogative to actual citizens of the US. That is clearly a negative thing. So when talking about reverse racism, I say that it needs to be used correctly, therefore, not too much advantage to minorities, but also not too …show more content…
I think that the answer should be yes and no. Why would I say that? I would say yes because, people who have disparate types of life have contrasting experiences with racism. I would also say no because, no matter what racism will be racism. It all depends on how people treat people with racial diversity. So if a person in America thinks that racism means to call someone the N word, a person from Europe may think it would be someone not letting other people live in their country. Both cases would be an appropriate example, but it does change with what situation people are in, or what they have been taught what racism

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The first flaw in Garcia’s work is when he states “Racism, then, is something that essentially involves not our beliefs and their rationality or irrationality, but our wants, intentions, likes, and dislikes and their distance from the moral virtues. (236) The problem with this statement is how Garcia attempts to challenge the belief-based theory. Garcia attempts to disprove the counter of race being a social construction by saying that race need not be a thing for racism to still exist. His reasoning is that “People make distinctions in their hearts, whether consciously or not on the basis of their racial classifications.” (236) This reasoning is a weak way to justify the root of slavery. Racism is something that is more convoluted than a distinction in one’s heart.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Anderson explains how illocutionary silencing resulting from post-racialism qualifies as hermeneutical injustices due to a lack of perceived qualification of the speaker or lack of recognition of the speaker by the hearer, both of which can be due to race. Silencing is when there’s not a misunderstanding but rather a lack of recognition of speech, and the speaker is altogether dismissed on account of race. While Anderson does state that these forms of hermeneutical injustices can result from attempts at the prescriptive ideals, he initially notes that the reason for the ideals in the first place is to get rid of these. Therefore, risking the maintenance of these injustices is worth trying to remove them. If we pair the idea that hermeneutical injustices are already present with the previous comments of prescriptive ideals as end goals to gradually strive towards rather than prematurely assume, it is evident that they are valid ideas with potential for…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Argument Four: Homosexuality is condemned by religion(s), condemned by the Bible and other religious texts. Premise: Any type of sexual activity that is contrary to religion or religious text is wrong. Conclusion: Therefore, homosexual sex is wrong because it goes against religion. Counter Argument Four: Premise: Any type of sexual immortality that is contrary to religious text is wrong. Conclusion: Therefore, sexual immorality is wrong.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We might be upset when they see this image because we will realize how big of a problem racism is in today’s society. Or, some people might get offended by the image because they might think that racism is not a problem in America, and they don’t think that this image is true. Also, there are racists in America, and these racists might get mad at this image saying that this image is true and the color of our skin does determine the type of future that we have. Aforementioned, when people say that the color of our skin determines what our future looks like, that tells us that racism is a problem in the United States. This brings up logos, and shows us that we do need to do something about the racism in the United States, and try and put an end to it.…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophers have developed concepts they consider are sufficient for defining racism. One philosopher is Tommie Shelby. Shelby presents his reasoning for why we should view racism as an ideology, or a system of beliefs that constitute social oppression. Shelby opposes Garcia who accepts that beliefs do not contribute to racism because one should be able to explain one’s beliefs; in some cases, the subjects cannot. This means that racial discrimination is not just about the individual but also society.…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prejudice is a pre-judgment not based on reason (What’s the Difference Between Prejudice and Racism, Nicki Cole). On the other hand, racism creates a structure of domination or a hierarchy based on a race (What’s the Difference Between Prejudice and Racism, Nicki Cole). For example, being prejudice towards someone’s hair color does not involve race. A blonde could be referred to a “dumb blonde” all their life and be insulted, harassed and treated down upon, but still regarded with dignity. Racism regards categorizing a race and wanting dominance over that race.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, their action, of discrimination, comes from impulse and all their internal feelings. Therefore, someone may say that they are not racist, but society may disagree with them because of their actions. In the article Is Every One A Bit Racist? By Nicholas Kristof, he attempts to prove that racism is internalized. I believe that Nicholas Kristof argues that people are not racist.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This may be confusing for some but there is a significant difference between dismissing race as an underlying social issue versus acknowledging race as a social construction. The reality is, people that adhere to color-blind ideology are not free of their unconscious prejudices simply because they choose to believe we have all assimilated. Studies have shown individuals harbor unconscious biases which are shaped by several factors of the socialization process (Quillian, 2008 ; Moule, 2009). Understanding that we all possess unconscious biases can assist…

    • 1663 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Belief congruence theory explains discrimination primarily due to differences in belief, stating that belief is more important that racial or ethnic membership in determining racial discrimination (Cox , Smith, & Insko, 1996). The advantages of this theory was its attempt to discriminate discrimination based on race and that based on beliefs, attitudes and values, while attempting to create a theory applicable not just to the scope being discussed but all race relations (Cox , Smith, & Insko, 1996). One critical application that negates its application to current day US racial relationship is that theory states then when prejudice is institutional or socially sanctioned, belief congruence does not play a role (Vaughan & Hogg, 2014). This theory’s restriction would therefore ignore current issues such as the higher incarceration rates for African Americans who are estimated to be 900,000 of the total 2.2 million prison population (Mauer & King,…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A variable that changes with every interaction. The article states there can be two different ideals of racism in this case, race-based prejudice or discrimination where anyone can be racist and then we have institutional racism where those who are in power are racist. Here it is believed that the racism in America is rooted in its own culture. What this meant is that the American people hold onto the stereotypes they learn, i.e. from family, and in turn between different groups are held a predisposition that one is better than the other.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays