In the Mock Supreme Court, I had the role of being a Justice, which made it my job to give the final judging in all cases involving laws of Congress, and the Constitution. I worked on the case Fisher v. University of Texas, rooting back to 1977 when Texas legislation made a law that required the University of Texas give admission to all high school seniors who positioned in the top ten percent of their class. When discovering the lack of diversity in the their college 's undergraduates and state populace, the University of Texas chose to change its previously unbiased racial acceptances . The new approach allowed all in-state students who graduated in the main ten percent of their high school classes admission. For the rest of the in-state
…show more content…
Yet, the question still stands, considering race never means just minority races or majority races, and it’s the consideration of race which does not mean you won 't get in because of the race you are. I went through the Amicus briefs for this case, The United States, supported the university of Texas because there are educational benefits that come from student body diversity that justifies any university’s consideration of race during admissions. Teach for America, supported University of Texas because they felt desegregation of schools is one of the most important factors to date, and supported a mixed class of races. Even, Harvard University supported University of Texas because courts long affirmed that after a student body is judged if they meet the academic needs , that race is allowed to play a factor in selection, that amicus brief really stood out to me for the reason that harvard is a private university and doesn’t have to abide by the Equal Protection clause but still decided in favor of The University of Texas. I also looked at amicus briefs that supported fisher American Civil Rights Union, supported Fisher for the fact that the college was racially discriminative of whites and Jews and favours of minorities and that spoil systems for race were put in place. Pacific Legal Foundation supported Fisher because they felt that University of Texas was accepting only minorities to gain from the benefit of having a diverse
Yet, the question still stands, considering race never means just minority races or majority races, and it’s the consideration of race which does not mean you won 't get in because of the race you are. I went through the Amicus briefs for this case, The United States, supported the university of Texas because there are educational benefits that come from student body diversity that justifies any university’s consideration of race during admissions. Teach for America, supported University of Texas because they felt desegregation of schools is one of the most important factors to date, and supported a mixed class of races. Even, Harvard University supported University of Texas because courts long affirmed that after a student body is judged if they meet the academic needs , that race is allowed to play a factor in selection, that amicus brief really stood out to me for the reason that harvard is a private university and doesn’t have to abide by the Equal Protection clause but still decided in favor of The University of Texas. I also looked at amicus briefs that supported fisher American Civil Rights Union, supported Fisher for the fact that the college was racially discriminative of whites and Jews and favours of minorities and that spoil systems for race were put in place. Pacific Legal Foundation supported Fisher because they felt that University of Texas was accepting only minorities to gain from the benefit of having a diverse