In the article, these hindrances are called “biases” and several key types the author, Ulli Appelbaum, finds either most common or most destructive to creative decision making/problem solving are discussed. Some of these biases include confirmation, self-serving, belief, and framing bias (Appelbaum, 2015). Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson, like Appelbaum, mention several similar biases, like framing and self-serving, but also discuss topics such as bounded rationality, which is defined as “…the notion that decision makers simply do not have the ability or resources to process all available information and alternatives to make an optimal decision.” (Organiztional Behavior , p. 255). Each source puts emphasis on certain types of hindrances, but both acknowledge that hindrances do exist and can effective a leader’s ability to make …show more content…
According to Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson, Tactic Knowledge “…is what employees can typically learn only through experience.” (Organiztional Behavior , p. 245). Appelbaum discusses this topic in his seventh tip which specifically talks about how expanding one’s marketing knowledge and experience can help substantially with decision making. According to Appelbaum “The more diverse marketing problems you have worked on…the more flexible and agile your thought processes will become.” (The Huffington Post, 2015). Appelbaum goes on to explain how a leader’s experience, or as Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson would say their Tactic Knowledge, act as a “short cut” and aids in the leader’s ability to make creative and effective