First of all, The Des Moines didn't have the right to suspend the students that wore the armbands. The argument that the dissent had was and should have been strong enough to win the jury’s anonymous vote. The argument had some strong points, one of the strongest was their constitutional rights. This guaranteed them a strong and valid argument, because constitutional rights are something that you can’t violate and have forever only if you don't commit
First of all, The Des Moines didn't have the right to suspend the students that wore the armbands. The argument that the dissent had was and should have been strong enough to win the jury’s anonymous vote. The argument had some strong points, one of the strongest was their constitutional rights. This guaranteed them a strong and valid argument, because constitutional rights are something that you can’t violate and have forever only if you don't commit