In the Tinker v. Des Moines court case the majority opinion believed that students need to have restrictions in place dictating what they can and cannot wear, and the teachers should effectively enforce the rules. Essentially, the majority agreed with the school principal's action to prohibit groups of students from wearing black armbands in support of the Vietnam war. Any student who proceeded to go against these rules would be suspended until all pieces of rules breaking clothing was removed.
The Supreme Court did not agree with the view of the majority as it is their duty to uphold the freedoms the constitution grants. Therefore, they voted in favor of the Tinkers. One important phrase of the majority opinion that Justice Fortas stated was that, “…students must hold their constitutional right of freedom of speech while in public school…”, five justices showed agreement with …show more content…
Not to be judged, and prohibited from learning based off of what they believe in and what they wear. A well known person today who would probably disagree with my and the Supreme Court's stance on this is our current President of the United States, or (POTUS), Donald Trump. The president may say that the armbands distract from other students learning and that the students have no right to weigh in on problems that have no direct impact upon them.
The obvious issue with this counterclaim would be that it violates the First Amendment, one that Mr.Trump has proven to be not fond of in the past. For example, his currently proposed ban on immigration from largely, or entirely, Islamic countries, is a blatant disregard for the rules that founded this “Make America Great Again” country.
All in all, the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Tinker v. Des Moines case was entirely constitutional and, proved to be a genuine progression for modern day American
The Supreme Court did not agree with the view of the majority as it is their duty to uphold the freedoms the constitution grants. Therefore, they voted in favor of the Tinkers. One important phrase of the majority opinion that Justice Fortas stated was that, “…students must hold their constitutional right of freedom of speech while in public school…”, five justices showed agreement with …show more content…
Not to be judged, and prohibited from learning based off of what they believe in and what they wear. A well known person today who would probably disagree with my and the Supreme Court's stance on this is our current President of the United States, or (POTUS), Donald Trump. The president may say that the armbands distract from other students learning and that the students have no right to weigh in on problems that have no direct impact upon them.
The obvious issue with this counterclaim would be that it violates the First Amendment, one that Mr.Trump has proven to be not fond of in the past. For example, his currently proposed ban on immigration from largely, or entirely, Islamic countries, is a blatant disregard for the rules that founded this “Make America Great Again” country.
All in all, the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Tinker v. Des Moines case was entirely constitutional and, proved to be a genuine progression for modern day American