In The Things They Carried , O’Brien really likes to get the reader wondering if what he is saying is true. This makes it impossible to figure out whether or not his stories actually happened. It may be frustrating to most readers, but there is a greater purpose behind this strategy. Think of this book as a therapy …show more content…
O’Brien is suffering and he is in an ongoing wrestling match with his thoughts and feelings. Such a state of mind is beyond imaginable, for some readers, and this book, and the way he tells it, is the only way O’Brien can properly express it. So the reader really has no excuse for why this story should not be told exactly how it is. On the other hand, O’Brien’s method of storytelling is so biased towards him, that it becomes dishonest to the reader. How could the average person begin to appreciate the value of an exerpt such as this. “A thing may happen and be a total lie; another thing may not happen and be truer than the truth.”(pg.83). There are countless ways this statement could be interpreted, but there is only one way O’Brien wants the reader to see it. It that sense it would be unfair to the reader because O’Brien makes his book so complex that trying to find the correct meaning in it would pose a great