Journal your thoughts on Fisher’s hypothesis and experiment: How do you want to write about this in your response paper?
My thoughts about Fisher’s hypothesis and experiment are a little bit confuse to me. Who will think that love is not about feeling but that it is a human drive which makes you reproduce? Since I read Fisher’s paper, every time I think about love, I start to remember about those chemicals of the brain that Fisher mention; Norepinephrine, Dopamine, and Oxytocin. The experiment was very interesting for me, I never thought that your mind could reflect love. I always saw love more easily reflect in the heart, never with the chemical in your brain. The hypothesis was a little bit unbeliever at the beginning because I never thought about it before, but at the end it makes sense. In my response paper, I want to write about the result between her hypothesis and the experiment.
Journal about how it was to write a response paper to Helen Fisher. What was the process like for you? What did you learn about your writing?
It was good to write a response paper to Helen Fisher. In the personal I like to write but I have a lot to improve. I enjoy this reading and writing of the paper. The …show more content…
I never thought that she will do whatever was necessary to make Jason suffer, not matter if she has to suffer as well. She is a very evil woman. I didn’t like the end of the play because it was unfair. It was fine that the King and his daughter die. The king was not supposed to give Medea another day in his country because he knew she was dangerous. The worse part of the end is when she kills her children to make their father pay for what he did. I wasn 't expecting that. I think that it was unfair because the children were not responsible for anything that happened. Also, She got to move on and have new children, when she already killed the one she had. That was bad because how a woman that disappear her own blood have another
My thoughts about Fisher’s hypothesis and experiment are a little bit confuse to me. Who will think that love is not about feeling but that it is a human drive which makes you reproduce? Since I read Fisher’s paper, every time I think about love, I start to remember about those chemicals of the brain that Fisher mention; Norepinephrine, Dopamine, and Oxytocin. The experiment was very interesting for me, I never thought that your mind could reflect love. I always saw love more easily reflect in the heart, never with the chemical in your brain. The hypothesis was a little bit unbeliever at the beginning because I never thought about it before, but at the end it makes sense. In my response paper, I want to write about the result between her hypothesis and the experiment.
Journal about how it was to write a response paper to Helen Fisher. What was the process like for you? What did you learn about your writing?
It was good to write a response paper to Helen Fisher. In the personal I like to write but I have a lot to improve. I enjoy this reading and writing of the paper. The …show more content…
I never thought that she will do whatever was necessary to make Jason suffer, not matter if she has to suffer as well. She is a very evil woman. I didn’t like the end of the play because it was unfair. It was fine that the King and his daughter die. The king was not supposed to give Medea another day in his country because he knew she was dangerous. The worse part of the end is when she kills her children to make their father pay for what he did. I wasn 't expecting that. I think that it was unfair because the children were not responsible for anything that happened. Also, She got to move on and have new children, when she already killed the one she had. That was bad because how a woman that disappear her own blood have another