Reductio's Argument In Socrates 'Apology'

Superior Essays
The function of philosophical tools to philosophical discourse is the same as experimentation to the natural sciences: a method of inquiry into assertions about their respective domains. In Plato’s Apology, Socrates’ argument uses philosophical tools like constructive horned dilemmas, thought experiments, reductio ad absurdum, and analogy to questionably argue that his death would instantiate a beneficial outcome for himself. While Socrates’ rhetorical flourish precedes his reputation, he fails to consider important alternatives to his argument and roots his ideas heavily in Greek religion, making the argument unconvincing to the contemporary reader who does not share the same set of assumptions.

Socrates develops a single argument throughout the excerpt. His singular argument rests upon a constructive horned dilemma. A constructive horned dilemma is a method of argumentation in which the arguer sets up a disjunction of two conditional statements, affirms that the disjunction of the antecedents must be true, and then concludes that the
…show more content…
In a reductio ad absurdum, the philosopher advances an idea by proving that an absurd idea results from denying it. For example, we know that all bachelors are unmarried, otherwise we would have to accept a ridiculous contradiction in terms. In Socrates’ case, he utilizes the reductio to convince us that denying death is a blessing leads to absurd implications. If his constructive dilemma is correct, then to believe that death is not a blessing is to believe that an eternity of dialect ,free from the political trappings of Ancient Greece, is a negative outcome. Alternatively, it would mean that we should fear the type of death that would free us from the adamantine chains of our daily grind. Since both of these beliefs seem ludicrous, Socrates attempts to show us that the denial of his thesis leads to an untenable result, forcing us to accept his

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    A man of principle, Socrates stood by his word even when facing death. However, this prideful unyielding arrogance led to his downfall. Though today we regard him as a progressive, his shocking contrarian…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate how Socrates replied to the main charge he was…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates in Apology In the Apology, Socrates presents an argument for his belief in the Greek gods to invalidate Meletus’ assertion that Socrates is an atheist, which therefore means his teachings corrupt the youth (26b). Socrates’ argument is valid through philosophical logic yet as we will find, his argument is not sound. There are also revisions to Meletus’ claims which will be presented as it will display a stronger argument in favor of Socrates’ atheism.…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato’s “Apology” examines the trial of a great philosopher named Socrates. He is brought to court because of corrupting the youth and not believing in Gods. In response against his accusers, Socrates maintains that being sentenced to death is a possibility. While others fear death, as it is an evil; he does not fear it as he views death positively. According to Socrates, death is an advantage.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What are the charges against Socrates as recorded in the Apology. Is he guilty of them? why or why not? In Plato’s Apology, there were several charges against Socrates during his trial.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Apology of Socrates there is not real evidence of true impiety for the Athenian government, but Socrates does put forth feelings of arrogance and self-confidence within himself and his beliefs. Throughout Socrates’ trial he hardly questions anyone which would be seen in a traditional trial, he often goes on tangents and laments about the injustices of the world in large words that perhaps many of the people there did not understand which leads to him being seen as impious and rejecting traditional Athenian values. In the beginning of his trial Socrates talks about how he had never been to court in his more than seventy years of life, and that because he wasn’t accustomed to their language he would talk in the language he had learned,…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think Socrates did the right thing by allowing himself to be unjustly executed? Socrates had made an intelligent decision by sacrificing himself to protect the “Social contract” between the state and him, rather than escape from prison to break the rules. Use life to exchange for the preservation of his thought Escape from the prison is equivalent to destruct all of his thought and value what he had constructed during his lifetime. Because leaving Athens is kind of actions to contradict what he taught to his followers, be faithful to the righteousness.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates states in the Apology, “To fear death … is no other than to think oneself wise when one is not, to think one knows what one does not know” (29a). Fearing death is a form of ignorance. Socrates demonstrates he is not afraid of death because he does not have all the information to base his opinion of death. In addition, Socrates does not fear death because he is excited for the fact that he may continue his search for truth by examining the souls of the dead. Death may be a blessing in disguise or a curse.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was Socrates guilty as charged?" Socrates, an ancient Greek philosopher, is linked with Western systems of logic and philosophy. At an early age, he served in the hoplite-ancient Greek infantry, and later devoted his life to philosophy. His rather unique perspective and wisdom in philosophy attracted friends and enemies at the same time. Socrates metaphorically was the gadfly that stung the horse- Athenian state.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato's The Crito Argument

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In todays society we find many experts is the fields that they have studied in. You can find an expert in mathematics, science and an expert harpist. In order to prove that they are an expert one must only perform these tasks in such a way to show that they possess expert skills or knowledge. In order for them to gain such knowledge they often will train, study and learn such tasks from teachers, scholars or such experts in the field. In Plato’s work, The Crito, Socrates explores such a question and asks if there is an expert of the human soul.…

    • 1769 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The body, while seemingly clearly definable and understandable, is a concept that humans have struggled to define and understand for much of history. Social conceptions of the mind of spirit shaped philosophers’ understandings of the relationship between the mind and body, as well as attitudes toward the body. In his essay “The Concept of the Body,” Eliot Deutsch presents readers with four popular modes of conceiving of the body. These models, popularized at different points throughout history, are the prison, the temple, the machine, and the instrument. Through reading Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, one gains perspective on Socrates’ conception of the body, as a prison.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unit 3 - Synopsis of Reading "Socrates: A Life Examined", Pgs 61-91 In chapter 3 of Socrates: A Life Examined, author Luis E. Navia introduces us to a second Socratic testimony written by another one of Socrates’ contemporaries, Xenophon. Within this chapter we discuss some major bibliographical details of Xenophon and his involvement with Socrates. As well as his most important Socratic works, their significance with the Socratic problem, and their differences with writings of other contemporaries, such as Aristophanes. Most importantly, Xenophon’s Socratic contribution helps shed light on the reason why Socrates seemed to choose death over anything else.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays